How about a z/VM zLinux response to this?
http://www.computerworld.com/pdfs/RedHat_Enterprise_Linux_has_Best_TCO.pdf
Aaron
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.e
expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such
purpose.
From:
"Graves, Aaron"
To:
LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Date:
08/24/2010 03:16 PM
Subject:
Virtualization with the Best TCO?
How about a z/VM zLinux response to this?
http://www.computerworld.com/pdfs/RedHat_Enterprise_Linux_has_Be
>>> On 8/24/2010 at 03:15 PM, "Graves, Aaron" wrote:
> How about a z/VM zLinux response to this?
>
> http://www.computerworld.com/pdfs/RedHat_Enterprise_Linux_has_Best_TCO.pdf
If I were to say what I really think about this, I would most likely be
perceived as bashing a competitor. I don't wa
On Tuesday, 08/24/2010 at 03:16 EDT, "Graves, Aaron"
wrote:
> How about a z/VM zLinux response to this?
>
>
http://www.computerworld.com/pdfs/RedHat_Enterprise_Linux_has_Best_TCO.pdf
Not sure what you're looking for, Aaron, as Red Hat says nothing about
System z, limiting the comparison of their
Mark Post wrote:
On 8/24/2010 at 03:15 PM, "Graves, Aaron" wrote:
How about a z/VM zLinux response to this?
http://www.computerworld.com/pdfs/RedHat_Enterprise_Linux_has_Best_TCO.pdf
If I were to say what I really think about this, I would most likely be
perceived as bashing a competitor.
utside the perception of
the distributed world.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Alan
Altmark
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 12:37 AM
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: Virtualization with the Best TCO?
On Tuesday, 08/24/2010 at
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On
> Behalf Of Graves, Aaron
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 7:53 AM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Virtualization with the Best TCO?
>
> The implication is that the
>It is is not Intel, then it does not exist. How many Linux people (general
>population) consider Linux on the z, i, or p? >Unless you came up in the z, i,
>or p "world", those processors simply do not exist. "computer" is identically
>equal to >"Intel processor".
Then why are you talking about
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On
> Behalf Of Harder, Pieter
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 8:08 AM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Virtualization with the Best TCO?
>
> >It is is not Intel,
tore.agb...@volvo.com
http://www.volvo.com/volvoit/global/en-gb/
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of McKown,
John
Sent: den 25 augusti 2010 15:16
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtualization with the Best TCO?
> -Orig
RIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtualization with the Best TCO?
Why don't we all from now on always mentioned zLinux in one way
or another (depending on subject, situation) when we post comments
at various sites, fa ce book, my sp ace, email, you name it.
All of us here cover the world you know !
Why no
.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Alan
Altmark
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 12:37 AM
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: Virtualization with the Best TCO?
On Tuesday, 08/24/2010 at 03:16 EDT, "Graves, Aaron"
wrote:
How about a z/VM zLinux response to this?
http://w
.
bar...@vm1.velocity-software.com
Sent by: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
08/25/2010 10:26 AM
Please respond to
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Virtualization with the Best TCO?
Isn't the real problem that the VMWare vendor(s) does a LOT of
advertisin
> 2) BIggest savings is middleware - more virtual servers per unit (harware)
> equals less in license costs
IFF your software ia available on the system in question and your vendor
charges the same for support on all platforms and you need support/run
lots of licence encumbered software.
At the e
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 16:15 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> At the end of the day you can produce a comparison to make the sun shine
> out of any particular backside.
Dammit, that's worth stealing as a (attributed) sigline.
Thanks Alan, now I can go to bed with my cynicism intact ... :0)
Shane ...
--
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Alan Cox
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 11:15 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtualization with the Best TCO?
>> 2) BIggest savings is middleware - more virtual servers pe
On Wednesday, 08/25/2010 at 09:10 EDT, "Graves, Aaron"
wrote:
> The implication is that these represent the leading edge of
virtualization,
> completely ignoring z/VM's capabilities. This happens time after time,
> conference after conference and webcast after webcast. It's almost like
z/VM
> wi
On 08/24/2010 06:16 PM, Mark Post wrote:
On 8/24/2010 at 03:15 PM, "Graves, Aaron" wrote:
How about a z/VM zLinux response to this?
http://www.computerworld.com/pdfs/RedHat_Enterprise_Linux_has_Best_TCO.pdf
If I were to say what I really think about this, I would most likely be
perceived a
18 matches
Mail list logo
