>I think this raises some questions.. My feeling is that most people
>aiming to write music on this OS is expecting to have apps with super
>easy and intuitive interfaces, where you only go trough displays,
>knobs, sliders and paintabe areas.
>Why we dont have apps such as Reason, Reaktor, Sonar,
However, forgot to mention, that it would be still nice to see
user-friendliness become a standard in Linux ;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Ivica Bukvic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:42 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [linux-audio-dev] Poll about
What I think is that this is great since there is less likelihood that
someone else will be using the same tools I do and hence less likely
will my music sound like thousands of others :-)
Ivica Ico Bukvic, composer, multimedia sculptor,
programmer, webmaster & computer consultant
http://meowin
>Here's a problem I commonly find in existing audio apps or in
>programming audio apps: Audio routing.
>
>The way things work now, it's hard for apps to implement a standard
>way of:
First, you can't do any better on MacOS or Windows, because ReWire or
DirectConnect are the only (low latency) opt
I thought this may be of interest to the list.
In a k5 poll about usability of linux audio apps,
( http://www.kuro5hin.org/poll/1023512126_OSelOkZS )
So far, out of 38 answers the results are:
-How do you like music software for Linux?
2 % - Great! It has everything I need.
13 % - Good, but i
Here's a problem I commonly find in existing audio apps or in
programming audio apps: Audio routing.
The way things work now, it's hard for apps to implement a standard
way of:
-Route audio from an app to another
-Share audio devices/routes
-Apply Audio modifiers (Effects)
LADSPA is great for i
> I've been running kernel with the DRM patches since January and it has been
> rock solid. However my machines are UP only, so if someone happens to be
> running kernel with the patches on SMP machine I would like to know if it
> works irl.
I've been using them with a Radeon card for about a mon
Vincent Touquet wrote:
>
> Do you know if these
> patches will make it into
> the mainline kernel ?
I offered those to Andrew Morton months ago.
I think it's up to him to decide, Andrew?
> I don't know what objections there
> could be to a conditional_reschedule() ?
I have read the DRM driver
Do you know if these
patches will make it into
the mainline kernel ?
I don't know what objections there
could be to a conditional_reschedule() ?
regards
Vincent
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 11:00:53PM +0300, Jussi Laako wrote:
>Yes, I have made some lowlatency additions to Matrox and ATI drivers.
>A
Enrique Robledo Arnuncio wrote:
>
> Running latencytest I have found a quite bad behaviour with the high
> X11 load test when the X server has the DRI module loaded and active.
>
> Is anyone there using DRI and lowlatency-patch at the same time?
>
> Have you experienced this kind of problems?
>
Hi!
I'd like to create a virtual 2-(stereo)-channel alsa device from one
ISA SB AWE and one on-board VIA alsa device. Has anyone figured out
how to do this using .asoundrc magic? [I know Jaroslav knows and told
Joern, but I think this is of greater interest]
Joern/Jaroslav, can you post a quick
11 matches
Mail list logo
