-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 22 Juin 2003 23:25, Ivica Bukvic a écrit :
> I never implied occlusion of the source code nor did I ever suggest
> that I've worked out all the quirks out of the whole system. It is/was
> a mere proposal to instigate a discussion at this point, not
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 11:25:58PM -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
> > I don't care about Linux.
>
> So what in the world are you doing on a _linux_ audio dev list?
i wouldn't mind this being free-audio-dev list. although i think it
would lose some of the technical focus on the particular intricacies
o
> Guess what: your derived license would be incompatible with the GPL or
any
> OSI license. You don't understand what free software is.
Here you go again, yakking making conclusions on your own doctored
"facts."
I never implied occlusion of the source code nor did I ever suggest that
I've worked
> Do we want to _become_ what our "competition" is? I don't think so. I
> don't like pushy tactics. We are (by some measure) successsfull
because
> we are not like the "competition".
Point well taken. However, as someone pointed out earlier, we need more
contributors to our community in order to h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 22 Juin 2003 13:46, Ivica Bukvic a écrit :
> Again, please read what I've stated and then respond. I am not
> advocating the change of GPL, but creating a new derived license which
> simply ensures that the efforts of the open-source community prim
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 05:52:47PM -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
> Software would remain open-source. But the assumption is if you are
> willing to part with the freedoms Linux and other GNU OS's offer, and
> [...]
> I disagree. It penalizes the company so that it cannot claim that it is
> Unix-like
> Software would remain open-source. But the assumption is if you are
> willing to part with the freedoms Linux and other GNU OS's offer, and
> pay for a costlier system, as well as a bunch of shrink-wrapped apps,
> then you might as well pay for the oss apps and help the oss community.
> No one wo
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 10:50:39PM +0100, DG Malham wrote:
> Not that I know of, yet.
>
> Dave
>
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, oliver thuns wrote:
>
> > hello,
> >
> > i'm looking for a solution to encode an ambisonics signal to 2 channel
> > UHJ in real time. is there for example a LADSPA or (
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:46:30PM -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
> > > So basically, you want to restrict the use of a software to a
specific
> > > type of operating system? Like M$ does?
> >
> > Not a _specific_ OS. There are _many_ open-source OS's out there and
> > none of them have monopolistic
Not that I know of, yet.
Dave
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, oliver thuns wrote:
> hello,
>
> i'm looking for a solution to encode an ambisonics signal to 2 channel
> UHJ in real time. is there for example a LADSPA or (linux compatible)
> VST plugin to do this?
>
> oliver
>
>
> Hi,
>
> lördagen den 21 juni 2003 09.18 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Wanted to post a quick success story with the 2.5 kernel series:
> > Machine
> > processor VIA C3 Ezra
> > cpu MHz : 932.918
> > bogomips: 1843.20
> > 256MB ram
> >
> > Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technolog
>I would love to hear from Paul Davis on this issue since he is one of
>the most involved contributors in this community when it comes to
>monetary dependence. Paul?
at the point you wrote this, i was at about mile 142 of a 200 mile
bicycle ride through north-western new jersey. i finished 2
hours
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:46:30PM -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
> > So basically, you want to restrict the use of a software to a specific
> > type of operating system? Like M$ does?
>
> Not a _specific_ OS. There are _many_ open-source OS's out there and
> none of them have monopolistic agenda like
> So basically, you want to restrict the use of a software to a specific
> type of operating system? Like M$ does?
Not a _specific_ OS. There are _many_ open-source OS's out there and
none of them have monopolistic agenda like Apple or M$. Nor do they use
the open-source community efforts to promo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 22 Juin 2003 07:28, Ivica Bukvic a écrit :
> Many of you have pointed out that limiting GPL would hinder the freedom
> it stands for. I agree. I never meant to change THE GPL, but rather to
> create an offspring GPL-like license that had my suggest
> > Now if you allow your Open Source Applications to be ported to
this
> > proprietary OSes, you strengthen this behaviour and weaken the
Open
> > Source Movement. People will get your software but will stick with
OSX
> > or whatever cause of this called Killerapps.
Systems.
>
> Just to add a bit
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:linux-audio-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik de Castro Lopo
> Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 3:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] New form of GPL licence that protects
Linux
> from proprietary world [w
There will be an OSX driver for the Creamware platform.
Reverse engieneering will be more realistic then, won't it?
Blaze1st
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 22:16:52 -0400
"Ivica Bukvic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I really don't see this as a problem.
>
> Do you mind saying why?
Well people using libsndfile means that there are less people rolling
their own buggy implementations. This eventually means that libsndfile
has to h
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 10:19:21PM -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
>My point exactly :-).
>Just to add a bit onto this issue is that we could still support
>non-opensource systems, but they would need to purchase the software
>(see my other e-mail with the Trolltech as an example).
Dual licensing is a
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 07:53:38PM -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
(cut)
>-- a unified and powerful underlying framework. Yet, that is not what
>we're working on right now...
I noted a lot of Mac OS X projects making use of libsndfile already.
The common Unix base is a huge step forward.
Now there are 2
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:22:37PM -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
>However this brings up one interesting point/problem. Due to GPL nature
>of Linux software, many of our efforts will seamlessly bleed into OS X
>world since there are no restrictions as to which platform this software
>is run on, and Ap
22 matches
Mail list logo
