On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 08:02, Paul Davis wrote:
> >> I've been thinking about ways to use this feature to improve and
> >> simplify the current security situation for Linux audio. No
> >> conclusions, but here are some thoughts for discussion:
> >>
> >> (1) There should a simple way for the sysad
> Paul Davis:
> > >Since mainstream capabilities support seems always to be somewhere
> > >over the horizon, I am interested in the patch Paul and Steve
> > >mentioned. IIUC, it defines a control file in /proc which, if
> > >enabled, allows any process access to scheduling and memory locking
> > >
> Jack O'Quin writes:
> > One of the things I like about the `audio' group approach is that
> > it is easy to administer and simple to verify who has access to
> > those privileges.
martin rumori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i think, that's a clean solution. to be able to distinguish between
Thanks for this tut.
Just one thought : the include statements in your code snipnets do not appear
correctly because of the <>. You could pass them through vim to take care of
the html characters (and add some color :).
$ vim +f +"syntax on" +"so $VIMRUNTIME/syntax/2html.vim" +"wq" +"q" *.c
ch
>Looks like I forgot to attach the patch...
i don't think this patch isn't ready to be added to CVS yet:
1) the null cycle callback is wrong. it will generate random noise, and
should instead generate silence.
2) the buffer size callback is wrong. you have to stop the hardware,
Jussi Laako <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does PortAudio support 24/32 bit formats and more than 2 channels or
> samplerates over 48 kHz?
All my experience is with my home system, which runs ALSA drivers
using the OSS emulation interfaces. I suspect things would probably
work differently using
> Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > (4) Let the user that is currently physical logged in to the machine
> > get realtime privileges.
Jack O'Quin writes:
> It does seem difficult within the context of X11 to prove that a user
> is actually local to the machine. Some p
Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about this one:
>
> (4) Let the user that is currently physical logged in to the machine
> get realtime privileges.
Good idea.
I don't know enough about the 2.6 security model to say how one might
go about implementing that.
In som
Looks like I forgot to attach the patch...
--
Jussi Laako <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- jack-audio-connection-kit-0.90.0/configure.in 2003-11-16 00:39:16.0
+0200
+++ jackit.mod/configure.in 2003-11-16 22:50:17.0 +0200
@@ -116,8 +116,8 @@
JACK_CORE_CFLAGS="-I\$(top_srcdir)
Attached is a patch to add OSS audio driver support to the
jack-audio-connection-kit 0.90.0. This is a first quick hack of 0.80.0
driver to 0.90.0, but better one is coming..
Apply patch and run "autoreconf --force --install" to regenerate
configure stuff.
RPMs for RedHat 9 and source .tar.gz is
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:30:36 +, Mike Rawes wrote:
> > ERROR: port 0 is LOGARITHMIC but LowerBound isn't positive
>
> Is this really an error? Dealing with the aymptote is trivial, and needs
> to be done anyway if a host allows the user to change the range hints.
Well, LOGARITHMIC was neve
>> I've been thinking about ways to use this feature to improve and
>> simplify the current security situation for Linux audio. No
>> conclusions, but here are some thoughts for discussion:
>>
>> (1) There should a simple way for the sysadmin to reliably disallow
[ .. ]
>> (2) Using sysctl,
"Jack O'Quin":
>
> I've been thinking about ways to use this feature to improve and
> simplify the current security situation for Linux audio. No
> conclusions, but here are some thoughts for discussion:
>
> (1) There should a simple way for the sysadmin to reliably disallow
> realtime privi
Paul Davis:
> >Since mainstream capabilities support seems always to be somewhere
> >over the horizon, I am interested in the patch Paul and Steve
> >mentioned. IIUC, it defines a control file in /proc which, if
> >enabled, allows any process access to scheduling and memory locking
> >privileges.
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 14:30:17 +
Nick Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are my latest test results from running Demolition
> http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~njl98r/code/ladspa/demolition.html
>
> 237 plugins were tested from 117 plug-in libraries, including all the
> ones in BLOP, CMT, SWH, MC
15 matches
Mail list logo
