Thanks for this tut. Just one thought : the include statements in your code snipnets do not appear correctly because of the <>. You could pass them through vim to take care of the html characters (and add some color :).
$ vim +f +"syntax on" +"so $VIMRUNTIME/syntax/2html.vim" +"wq" +"q" *.c cheers, piem On Tuesday 21 October 2003 14:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 20 Oct, 2003 at 01:19PM +0200, Mathias Lundgren spake thus: > > Great, great, great! Thanks a lot! IMHO, documentation like this one is > > definitely needed and something we're currently lacking. I've only > > skimmed it, but I'm going to read it more thoroughly later on, since it's > > stuff I need to read up on. > > > > That said, I'm a newbie on the subject, but I guess that makes me part of > > the targeted audience for the tutorial. I think you're explaining things > > very well. Of course, one can always look through code and find out what > > is going on when learning about things like these, but it's much better > > to also get the general idea of things before looking through the code. > > You're explaining both concepts and give examples, and do both very well. > > Good job! > > Thanks for the comments. Let me know if you have any suggestions for > improvement. > > > /Mathias > > > > > Hi, > > > I've recently been learning to use JACK, and I had a look around for > > > some kind of introductory article. I couldn't find one, so I wrote > > > the tutorial I would have wanted, as I learnt. > > > > > > The tutorial is here: > > > http://dis-dot-dat.net/jacktuts/starting/index.html > > > > > > Please have a look, make suggestions. Flames are fine, too. Let me > > > know if I've made some huge error. Or maybe I'm not doing things > > > the best way? Whatever, let me know. > > > > > > If this is well received, I'll write about more advanced topics as I > > > get to them - mixing, the transport, threading without blocking the > > > process callback, etc. > > > > > > I'll probably be asking a lot of questions later on, especially > > > about best practise. > > > > > > Thanks peeps, > > > > > > James
