On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 04:45:21PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:57:28AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Would anyone object to using u32 in these prototypes?
>
> Well, would there be any disadvantage to forcing them to u32?
> Potentially by something else wanting to use
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:57:28AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Would anyone object to using u32 in these prototypes?
Well, would there be any disadvantage to forcing them to u32?
Potentially by something else wanting to use those interfaces besides
the regset thing and that something else doesn't
* Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:22:49AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > The 'kbuf' parameter is unused in the _user() side of the API, remove it.
> >
> > This simplifies the code and makes it easier to think about.
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -1010,10 +1010,7 @@ int copy_xstate_to_ke
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:22:49AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> The 'kbuf' parameter is unused in the _user() side of the API, remove it.
>
> This simplifies the code and makes it easier to think about.
...
> @@ -1010,10 +1010,7 @@ int copy_xstate_to_kernel(unsigned int pos, unsigned
> int count
The 'kbuf' parameter is unused in the _user() side of the API, remove it.
This simplifies the code and makes it easier to think about.
Cc: Andy Lutomirski
Cc: Borislav Petkov
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Fenghua Yu
Cc: H. Peter Anvin
Cc: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Thomas
5 matches
Mail list logo