Hi Andrew,
> Perhaps export it from within a powerpc-specific C file (along with
> suitable comment) to prevent people from generally relying upon the
> export?
Even better, I'll export it from a Cell-specific C file. I'll follow
this up in my own spufs series for .25.
Cheers,
Jeremy
-
To
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 11:41:41PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Perhaps export it from within a powerpc-specific C file (along with
> suitable comment) to prevent people from generally relying upon the export?
Yes, please. I don't like this beeing exported at all.
-
To unsubscribe from this lis
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:36:52 +1100 Jeremy Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This change allows force_sig_info to be called from modules.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
>
> Any objections to exporting this symbol? I'm planning to move some
> SPU fault-handling code fr
This change allows force_sig_info to be called from modules.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Any objections to exporting this symbol? I'm planning to move some
SPU fault-handling code from the kernel to the spufs.ko object.
---
kernel/signal.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 in
4 matches
Mail list logo