* Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > The fault handling code tries to validate that a page fault from
> > user mode that would extend the stack is within a certain range of
> > the user SP. regs->sp is only equal to the user SP if
> > user_mode(regs). In the extremely
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > The fault handling code tries to validate that a page fault from
> > user mode that would extend the stack is within a certain range of
> > the user SP. regs->sp is only equal to the user SP if
> > user_mode(regs). In the extremely
* Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> The fault handling code tries to validate that a page fault from
> user mode that would extend the stack is within a certain range of
> the user SP. regs->sp is only equal to the user SP if
> user_mode(regs). In the extremely unlikely event that that
>
* Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> The fault handling code tries to validate that a page fault from
> user mode that would extend the stack is within a certain range of
> the user SP. regs->sp is only equal to the user SP if
> user_mode(regs). In the extremely unlikely event that that
>
The fault handling code tries to validate that a page fault from
user mode that would extend the stack is within a certain range of
the user SP. regs->sp is only equal to the user SP if
user_mode(regs). In the extremely unlikely event that that
sw_error_code had the USER bit set but the faulting
The fault handling code tries to validate that a page fault from
user mode that would extend the stack is within a certain range of
the user SP. regs->sp is only equal to the user SP if
user_mode(regs). In the extremely unlikely event that that
sw_error_code had the USER bit set but the faulting
6 matches
Mail list logo