James Bottomley wrote:
However, there's still devloss_tmo to consider ... even in
multipath, I don't think you want to signal path failure until
devloss_tmo has fired otherwise you'll get too many transient up/down
events which damage performance if the array has an expensive failover
model.
Ye
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 15:05 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 10:00 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >> James Bottomley wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 22:15 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> OK, thanks. I'll assume that James and Hannes have this
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 10:00 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 22:15 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
OK, thanks. I'll assume that James and Hannes have this in hand (or will
have, by mid-week) and I won't do anything her
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 10:00 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 22:15 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> OK, thanks. I'll assume that James and Hannes have this in hand (or will
> >> have, by mid-week) and I won't do anything here.
> >
> > Just to confi
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 22:15 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> OK, thanks. I'll assume that James and Hannes have this in hand (or will
>> have, by mid-week) and I won't do anything here.
>
> Just to confirm what I think I'm going to be doing: rebasing the
> scsi-misc tree t
On Wed, Dec 12 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11 2007 at 18:33 +0200, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 22:15 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> OK, thanks. I'll assume that James and Hannes have this in hand (or will
> >> have, by mid-week) and I won't do
On Tue, Dec 11 2007 at 18:33 +0200, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 22:15 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> OK, thanks. I'll assume that James and Hannes have this in hand (or will
>> have, by mid-week) and I won't do anything here.
>
> Just to confirm what I think
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 22:15 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> OK, thanks. I'll assume that James and Hannes have this in hand (or will
> have, by mid-week) and I won't do anything here.
Just to confirm what I think I'm going to be doing: rebasing the
scsi-misc tree to remove this commit:
commit 86
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:17:14 +0200 Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
The make headers_check fails,
CHECK include/linux/usb/gadgetfs.h
CHECK include/linux/usb/ch9.h
CHECK include/linux/usb/cdc.h
CHECK include/linu
Le 25.11.2007 21:39, Laurent Riffard a écrit :
> Le 25.11.2007 08:37, James Bottomley a écrit :
>> On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 23:59 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
>>> Le 24.11.2007 14:26, James Bottomley a écrit :
OK, could you post dmesgs again, please. I actually tested this
>>> with an
aic7
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:17:14 +0200 Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >> The make headers_check fails,
> >>
> >> CHECK include/linux/usb/gadgetfs.h
> >> CHECK include/linux/usb/ch9.h
> >> CHECK include/linux/usb/cdc.h
> >> CHECK
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:28:32 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:14:17 +0100
> Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 11/26/2007 11:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >> Maybe if you can emit a broken-out with the fresh pull to test?
> > >
> > > http://us
Miles Lane wrote:
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c: In function 'xen_flush_tlb_others':
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:591: error: 'TLB_FLUSH_ALL' undeclared (first
> use in this function)
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:591: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
> reported only once
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:59
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Otherwise, please proceed to work out which diff I need to drop and
> hope like hell that it isn't git-x86..
hm? x86.git is fully bisectable - so a more accurate statement would be
"and hope that it's x86.git, so that it can be properly bisected" :-
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:25:22 +0800, Dave Young said:
> does boot_delay helps?
It might, if the kernel lived long enough to output a first printk for
us to delay after. :)
Shooting this one would be *easy* if the problem was an boot-time oops that
would otherwise scroll off the screen without a
On Nov 27, 2007 3:16 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:45:25 PST, Andrew Morton said:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc3/2.6.24-rc3-mm1/
>
> Finally got both time and motivation to at least start a bisect..
>
> 2.6.23-mm1 works on
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:54:56 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:27:03 PST, Andrew Morton said:
>
> > > git-x86.patch
> > > git-x86-fixup.patch
> > > git-x86-thread_order-borkage.patch
> > > git-x86-thread_order-borkage-fix.patch
> > > git-x86-identify_cpu-fix.patch
> > > git-
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:27:03 PST, Andrew Morton said:
> > git-x86.patch
> > git-x86-fixup.patch
> > git-x86-thread_order-borkage.patch
> > git-x86-thread_order-borkage-fix.patch
> > git-x86-identify_cpu-fix.patch
> > git-x86-memory_add_physaddr_to_nid-export-for-acpi-memhotplugko.patch
> > git-x86
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:16:26 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:45:25 PST, Andrew Morton said:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc3/2.6.24-rc3-mm1/
>
> Finally got both time and motivation to at least start a bisect..
>
> 2.6.23-m
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:45:25 PST, Andrew Morton said:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc3/2.6.24-rc3-mm1/
Finally got both time and motivation to at least start a bisect..
2.6.23-mm1 works on my D820 (x86_64 kernel, Core2 Duo T7200)
24-rc3-mm1 (plus 3 pa
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 06:55:41 +0100 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 02:39:08 +0100 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I have some warnings on each SCSI disc:
> >>
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> [ 30.724410] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access S
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:14:17 +0100
Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/26/2007 11:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> Maybe if you can emit a broken-out with the fresh pull to test?
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ is current. But it probably won't
> > compile.
>
> Yes it
On 11/26/2007 11:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> Maybe if you can emit a broken-out with the fresh pull to test?
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ is current. But it probably won't
> compile.
Yes it did :). And it worked. Both in qemu and on my desktop...
qemu output at:
http://www.fi.
On 11/26/2007 11:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ is current. But it probably won't
> compile. I'd suggest bisecting 2.6.24-rc3-mm1 would be easier.
Yes, I've bisected this and it pointed to git-x86.patch + 2 pushed fixes from
series, Then tried x86 git, but
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:08:33 +0100
Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/26/2007 09:45 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:39:43 -0500
> >> Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:18:39 -08
On 11/26/2007 09:45 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:39:43 -0500
>> Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:18:39 -0800
>>> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
> ..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL depends on X86_32. Is that too restrictive?
No. X86_64 only has one memory model.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at ht
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> hm. This smells like a startup ordering problem, but everything which
> refresh_zone_stat_thresholds() should be set up by the time we run
> initcalls. Maybe the zone lists are bad?
refresh_zone_stat_thresholds goes through each zone and updates
the s
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:33:19 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0021 RIP:
> > [] refresh_zone_stat_thresholds+0x6d/0x90
> > PGD 0
> > Oops: 0002 [1] SMP
> > last sysfs file:
> > CPU 0
> > Modules linked in:
> > Pid: 1
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:39:43 -0500
> Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:18:39 -0800
> > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > ..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
> > > > Kernel panic - n
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:34:15 -0800 (PST) Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:45:25 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc3/2.6.24-rc3-mm1/
> >
> > allnoconfi
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:39:43 -0500
Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:18:39 -0800
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > ..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
> > > Kernel panic - not syncing: IO-APIC + timer doesn't work! Try using the
> >
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:18:39 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
> > Kernel panic - not syncing: IO-APIC + timer doesn't work! Try using the
> > 'noapic' kernel parameter
>
> ACPI or x86 breakage, I guess.
>
> Did 'noapic' work?
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:45:25 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc3/2.6.24-rc3-mm1/
>
> allnoconfig on x86_64 gives:
>
> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c:84: error: implicit declaration of fu
On 11/26/2007 07:48 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
ERROR: "empty_zero_page" [drivers/kvm/kvm.ko] undefined!
[...]
> FYI, x86_64 has the exact same issue.
yes:
hot-fixes/git-x86-dont-unexport-empty_zero_page.patch
regards,
--
Jiri Slaby ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:45:25 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc3/2.6.24-rc3-mm1/
allnoconfig on x86_64 gives:
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c:84: error: implicit declaration of function 'pfn_valid'
mm/page_alloc.c:2533: error: implicit d
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:03:34 +0800
"Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 2:00 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:51:47 +0800 "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, andrew
> > >
> > > modpost failed for me:
> > > MODPOST 360 m
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 07:44:13PM +0200, James Bottomley wrote:
> Probing intermittent failures in Domain Validation, even with the fixes
> applied leads me to the conclusion that there are further problems with
> this commit:
>
> commit fc5eb4facedbd6d7117905e775cee1975f894e79
> Author: Hannes R
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:04:34 +0100
Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> It seems OK here from a quick test (i386, ext3-on-IDE).
> >>
> >> Maybe device driver/block breakage?
>
> Try revert
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=8655a546c83fc
Le 25.11.2007 08:37, James Bottomley a écrit :
> On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 23:59 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
>> Le 24.11.2007 14:26, James Bottomley a écrit :
>>> OK, could you post dmesgs again, please. I actually tested this
>> with an
>>> aic79xx card, and for me it does cause Domain Validation t
On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 23:59 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 24.11.2007 14:26, James Bottomley a écrit :
> > OK, could you post dmesgs again, please. I actually tested this
> with an
> > aic79xx card, and for me it does cause Domain Validation to succeed
> > again.
>
> James,
>
> Here is a dm
Le 24.11.2007 14:26, James Bottomley a écrit :
> On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 13:57 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
>> Le 24.11.2007 07:42, James Bottomley a écrit :
>>> On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 18:52 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 23.11.2007 12:38, Hannes Reinecke a écrit :
[snip]
I can confirm :
Gabriel C wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
>> On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 18:54 +0100, Gabriel C wrote:
>>> James Bottomley wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 13:57 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 24.11.2007 07:42, James Bottomley a écrit :
>> On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 18:52 +0100, Laurent Riffard w
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 18:54 +0100, Gabriel C wrote:
>> James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 13:57 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 24.11.2007 07:42, James Bottomley a écrit :
> On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 18:52 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
>> Le 23.11.20
kosaki wrote:
> Hi, Andrew
>
>>> Hi, Andrew
>>>
>>> I got following result in 'sync' command.
>>> It was too slow. (memory controller config is off ;)
>>> I attaches my .config.
>>> ==
> (snip)
>> Well I wonder how we did that.
>>
>> It seems OK here from a quick test (i386, ext3-on-IDE).
>>
>>
On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 18:54 +0100, Gabriel C wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 13:57 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> >> Le 24.11.2007 07:42, James Bottomley a écrit :
> >>> On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 18:52 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 23.11.2007 12:38, Hannes Reinecke
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 13:57 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
>> Le 24.11.2007 07:42, James Bottomley a écrit :
>>> On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 18:52 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 23.11.2007 12:38, Hannes Reinecke a écrit :
> Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Laurent Riffard
Probing intermittent failures in Domain Validation, even with the fixes
applied leads me to the conclusion that there are further problems with
this commit:
commit fc5eb4facedbd6d7117905e775cee1975f894e79
Author: Hannes Reinecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue Nov 6 09:23:40 2007 +0100
[SCSI]
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:58:21AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:44:40AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > >Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > >>On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:54:50 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal
> > >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 13:57 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 24.11.2007 07:42, James Bottomley a écrit :
> > On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 18:52 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> >> Le 23.11.2007 12:38, Hannes Reinecke a écrit :
> >>> Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Laurent Riffard wrote:
> > Le 21.11.20
Le 24.11.2007 07:42, James Bottomley a écrit :
> On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 18:52 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
>> Le 23.11.2007 12:38, Hannes Reinecke a écrit :
>>> Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 21.11.2007 23:41, Andrew Morton a écrit :
>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:45:2
Hi, Andrew
> > Hi, Andrew
> >
> > I got following result in 'sync' command.
> > It was too slow. (memory controller config is off ;)
> > I attaches my .config.
> > ==
(snip)
>
> Well I wonder how we did that.
>
> It seems OK here from a quick test (i386, ext3-on-IDE).
>
> Maybe device driver
On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 18:52 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 23.11.2007 12:38, Hannes Reinecke a écrit :
> > Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >> Laurent Riffard wrote:
> >>> Le 21.11.2007 23:41, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:45:22 +0100
> Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:18:39PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:41:23 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Kernel panic's across different architectures like powerpc, x86_64,
>
> powerpc complains about IO-APICs??
>
> > Dentry cache
Le 23.11.2007 12:38, Hannes Reinecke a écrit :
> Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Laurent Riffard wrote:
>>> Le 21.11.2007 23:41, Andrew Morton a écrit :
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:45:22 +0100
Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le 21.11.2007 05:45, Andrew Morton a écrit :
>> f
Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Laurent Riffard wrote:
>> Le 21.11.2007 23:41, Andrew Morton a écrit :
>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:45:22 +0100
>>> Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Le 21.11.2007 05:45, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 08:05:44AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On [Fri, 23.11.2007 01:48], Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 12:22:05 +0200 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <[EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On x86_64 'uname
Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 21.11.2007 23:41, Andrew Morton a écrit :
>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:45:22 +0100
>> Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Le 21.11.2007 05:45, Andrew Morton a écrit :
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc3/2.6.24-rc3-mm1/
Le 21.11.2007 23:41, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:45:22 +0100
> Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Le 21.11.2007 05:45, Andrew Morton a écrit :
>>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc3/2.6.24-rc3-mm1/
>> Hello,
>>
>> My system
On [Fri, 23.11.2007 01:48], Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 12:22:05 +0200 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On x86_64 'uname -m' return 'x86'. It break many userspace programs. apt
> > > and rpm for exampl
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 02:39:08 +0100 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have some warnings on each SCSI disc:
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>> [ 30.724410] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access SEAGATE ST318406LW
>> 0109 PQ: 0 ANSI: 3
>> [ 30.724419] scsi0:A:0:0: Tagged Queui
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 02:39:08 +0100 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have some warnings on each SCSI disc:
>
>
> ...
>
> [ 30.724410] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access SEAGATE ST318406LW 0109
> PQ: 0 ANSI: 3
> [ 30.724419] scsi0:A:0:0: Tagged Queuing enabled. Depth 32
> [ 30
I have some warnings on each SCSI disc:
...
[ 30.724410] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access SEAGATE ST318406LW 0109
PQ: 0 ANSI: 3
[ 30.724419] scsi0:A:0:0: Tagged Queuing enabled. Depth 32
[ 30.724435] target0:0:0: Beginning Domain Validation
[ 30.724446] target0:0:0: Domain Vali
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 12:22:05 +0200 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On x86_64 'uname -m' return 'x86'. It break many userspace programs. apt
> > and rpm for example.
> >
>
> Yes, there have been various discussions about this.
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 12:22:05 +0200 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On x86_64 'uname -m' return 'x86'. It break many userspace programs. apt
> and rpm for example.
>
Yes, there have been various discussions about this. I think Sam is cooking up
a fix?
-
To unsubscribe from th
On x86_64 'uname -m' return 'x86'. It break many userspace programs. apt
and rpm for example.
--
Regards, Kirill A. Shutemov
+ Belarus, Minsk
+ Velesys LLC, http://www.velesys.com/
+ ALT Linux Team, http://www.altlinux.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On [Wed, 21.11.2007 14:22], Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:23:46 +0200
> "Kirill A. Shutemov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > USB mouse(Logitech M-BT58) doesn't work. TouchPad works.
> > dmesg after rmmod usbcore && modprobe uhci_hcd:
> >
> > usbcore: registered new interface driv
On [Wed, 21.11.2007 20:33], Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 10:29 AM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:52:26 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:41:23 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:49:09 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:42:15 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Andrew
> >
> > I got following result in 'sync' command.
> > It was too slow. (memory controller config is off ;)
> > I attac
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:36:30 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The kernel build fails on powerpc while linking,
Only for allyesconfig (or maybe some other config that builds a lot of
stuff in.
> AS .tmp_kallsyms3.o
> LD vmlinux.o
> ld: TOC section size exceeds 64
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:45:22 +0100
Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le 21.11.2007 05:45, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc3/2.6.24-rc3-mm1/
>
> Hello,
>
> My system hangs shortly after I logged in Gnome desktop. SysRq
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:35:13 +0200
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Symbol init_level4_pgt is needed by nvidia module. Is it really need to
> unexport it?
It's our clever way of reducing the tester base so we don't get so many
bug reports.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send t
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:23:46 +0200
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> USB mouse(Logitech M-BT58) doesn't work. TouchPad works.
> dmesg after rmmod usbcore && modprobe uhci_hcd:
>
> usbcore: registered new interface driver usbfs
> usbcore: registered new interface driver hub
> usbco
On Nov 21, 2007 8:22 PM, Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2007 01:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:41:23 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
> > > ACPI: Core revision 20070126
> > > .
On Nov 21, 2007 10:29 AM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:52:26 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:41:23 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >> ACPI: Core revision 20070
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 01:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:41:23 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
> > ACPI: Core revision 20070126
> > ..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
did previous kernels print
On [Tue, 20.11.2007 22:15], Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:03:34 +0800 "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 21, 2007 2:00 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:51:47 +0800 "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
USB mouse(Logitech M-BT58) doesn't work. TouchPad works.
dmesg after rmmod usbcore && modprobe uhci_hcd:
usbcore: registered new interface driver usbfs
usbcore: registered new interface driver hub
usbcore: registered new device driver usb
USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver v3.0
ACPI: P
On 21-11-07 07:08, Andrew Morton wrote:
fix (for my config ?) is attached.
=
This was necessary to build.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
arch/ia64/lib/Makefile |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.24-rc3-mm1/arch/ia64/lib/Makefile
=
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
> headers_check continues to complain. Is the only recourse to add
> asm/kvm.h for all archs?
that's what's happened with other header files. see asm-*/auxvec.h,
for example.
rday
--
Avi Kivity wrote:
The make headers_check fails,
CHECK include/linux/usb/gadgetfs.h
CHECK include/linux/usb/ch9.h
CHECK include/linux/usb/cdc.h
CHECK include/linux/usb/audio.h
CHECK include/linux/kvm.h
/root/kernels/linux-2.6.24-rc3/usr/include/linux/kvm.h requires
asm/kvm.h, w
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:44:40AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:54:50 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The make headers_check fails,
CHECK include/linux/usb
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:44:40AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> >Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:54:50 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal
> >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>The make headers_check fails,
> >>>
> >>> CHECK include/linux/usb/gadgetf
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:52:26 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:41:23 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
Hi Andrew,
Kernel panic's across different architectures like p
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:52:26 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:41:23 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> Kernel panic's across different architectures like powerpc, x86_64,
> >
> >
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:41:23 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Kernel panic's across different architectures like powerpc, x86_64,
>
> powerpc complains about IO-APICs??
>
>> Dentry cache hash table entries: 8388608 (order: 14, 671088
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:52:08 -0500 (EST) "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
... snip ...
> > i'm sure i'm going to humiliate myself for asking this, but shouldn't
> > i be able to reproduce the above by just running:
> >
> > $ make ARCH=p
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:52:08 -0500 (EST) "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> > Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:54:50 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
>
Hi Andrew,
The kernel build fails on powerpc while linking,
AS .tmp_kallsyms3.o
LD vmlinux.o
ld: TOC section size exceeds 64k
make: *** [vmlinux.o] Error 1
The patch posted at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/13/414, solves this
failure.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kamalesh Babulal,
Linux
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:54:50 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > The make headers_check fails,
> > > >
> > > > CHECK include/linux/usb/gadgetfs.h
> > > >
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:42:15 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Andrew
>
> I got following result in 'sync' command.
> It was too slow. (memory controller config is off ;)
> I attaches my .config.
> ==
> [2.6.24-rc3-mm1]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dd if=/dev/zero of=./tmpfile b
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:42:15 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Andrew
>
> I got following result in 'sync' command.
> It was too slow. (memory controller config is off ;)
> I attaches my .config.
> ==
> [2.6.24-rc3-mm1]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dd if=/dev/zero of=./tmpfile b
Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:54:50 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The make headers_check fails,
CHECK include/linux/usb/gadgetfs.h
CHECK include/linux/usb/ch9.h
CHECK include/linux/usb/cdc.h
CHECK include/linux/
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:54:50 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The make headers_check fails,
>>
>> CHECK include/linux/usb/gadgetfs.h
>> CHECK include/linux/usb/ch9.h
>> CHECK include/linux/usb/cdc.h
>> CHECK include/linux/usb/audio.h
>>
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:54:50 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The make headers_check fails,
>
> CHECK include/linux/usb/gadgetfs.h
> CHECK include/linux/usb/ch9.h
> CHECK include/linux/usb/cdc.h
> CHECK include/linux/usb/audio.h
> CHECK include/linux/kvm.h
>
Hi Andrew,
The make headers_check fails,
CHECK include/linux/usb/gadgetfs.h
CHECK include/linux/usb/ch9.h
CHECK include/linux/usb/cdc.h
CHECK include/linux/usb/audio.h
CHECK include/linux/kvm.h
/root/kernels/linux-2.6.24-rc3/usr/include/linux/kvm.h requires asm/kvm.h,
which d
On Nov 21, 2007 2:15 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:03:34 +0800 "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 21, 2007 2:00 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:51:47 +0800 "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:41:23 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Kernel panic's across different architectures like powerpc, x86_64,
powerpc complains about IO-APICs??
> Dentry cache hash table entries: 8388608 (order: 14, 67108864 bytes)
> Inode-cache hash table
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:03:34 +0800 "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 2:00 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:51:47 +0800 "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, andrew
> > >
> > > modpost failed for me:
> > > MODPOST
Hi Andrew,
Kernel panic's across different architectures like powerpc, x86_64,
Dentry cache hash table entries: 8388608 (order: 14, 67108864 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 4194304 (order: 13, 33554432 bytes)
Mount-cache hash table entries: 256
SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
ACPI:
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
