Re: RFC: Phase 1: Proposal to convert V4L1 drivers

2010-03-23 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/22/2010 11:55 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: On Monday 22 March 2010 10:29:09 Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 03/22/2010 01:17 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: On Sunday 21 March 2010 23:45:04 Hans Verkuil wrote: On Saturday 20 March 2010 09:58:49 Hans Verkuil wrote: These drivers have no hardware to

Re: RFC: Phase 1: Proposal to convert V4L1 drivers

2010-03-22 Thread Theodore Kilgore
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Hans de Goede wrote: > > [...] I've seen the same > problem (not streaming) with the "old" version when used with machines > with UHCI usb controllers (rather then OHCI), such as atom based > laptops. > > So maybe this is some timing issues, and your changes have spe

Re: RFC: Phase 1: Proposal to convert V4L1 drivers

2010-03-22 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Monday 22 March 2010 10:29:09 Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/22/2010 01:17 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On Sunday 21 March 2010 23:45:04 Hans Verkuil wrote: > >> On Saturday 20 March 2010 09:58:49 Hans Verkuil wrote: > >>> These drivers have no hardware to test with: bw-qcam, c-qcam, arv,

Re: RFC: Phase 1: Proposal to convert V4L1 drivers

2010-03-22 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/22/2010 01:17 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: On Sunday 21 March 2010 23:45:04 Hans Verkuil wrote: On Saturday 20 March 2010 09:58:49 Hans Verkuil wrote: These drivers have no hardware to test with: bw-qcam, c-qcam, arv, w9966. However, all four should be easy to convert to v4l2, even withou

Re: RFC: Phase 1: Proposal to convert V4L1 drivers

2010-03-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sunday 21 March 2010 23:45:04 Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Saturday 20 March 2010 09:58:49 Hans Verkuil wrote: > > These drivers have no hardware to test with: bw-qcam, c-qcam, arv, w9966. > > However, all four should be easy to convert to v4l2, even without hardware. > > Volunteers? > > I've conve

Re: RFC: Phase 1: Proposal to convert V4L1 drivers

2010-03-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Saturday 20 March 2010 09:58:49 Hans Verkuil wrote: > These drivers have no hardware to test with: bw-qcam, c-qcam, arv, w9966. > However, all four should be easy to convert to v4l2, even without hardware. > Volunteers? I've converted these four drivers to V4L2. See my tree: http://www.linuxt

Re: RFC: Phase 1: Proposal to convert V4L1 drivers

2010-03-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Saturday 20 March 2010 19:38:39 Gerard Klaver wrote: > On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 09:58 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > > > > - ov511 > > - ovcamchip > > - w9968cf > > - stv680 > > > > > Conclusion: > > > > These drivers have no hardware to test with: bw-qcam, c-qcam, arv, w9966.

Re: RFC: Phase 1: Proposal to convert V4L1 drivers

2010-03-21 Thread Nicolas Will
On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 09:19 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > - cpia_pp > > > > > > Parallel port webcam driver for the Creative Webcam II. I found > one on eBay, > > > so with luck I can get hold of the hardware and get it to HdG. > > > > > > > Although I appreaciate your effort in getting this ca

Re: RFC: Phase 1: Proposal to convert V4L1 drivers

2010-03-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sunday 21 March 2010 00:09:16 Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/20/2010 09:58 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Well, I certainly fired everyone up with my RFC. Based on the replies I got > > I > > do think the time is right to start the removal process. > > > > Phase 1 would be t

Re: RFC: Phase 1: Proposal to convert V4L1 drivers

2010-03-20 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/20/2010 10:53 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: On Saturday 20 March 2010 09:58:49 Hans Verkuil wrote: Kconfig mistakes: I found four errors in drivers/media/video/Kconfig: the saa7191, meye, mxb and cpia2 drivers are all marked as V4L1 only, while all support V4L2! The cpia2 driver supports

Re: RFC: Phase 1: Proposal to convert V4L1 drivers

2010-03-20 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/20/2010 09:58 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: Hi all, Well, I certainly fired everyone up with my RFC. Based on the replies I got I do think the time is right to start the removal process. Phase 1 would be to convert the remaining V4L1 drivers. To see what needs to be done I decided to anal

Re: RFC: Phase 1: Proposal to convert V4L1 drivers

2010-03-20 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Saturday 20 March 2010 09:58:49 Hans Verkuil wrote: > > Kconfig mistakes: > > I found four errors in drivers/media/video/Kconfig: the saa7191, meye, mxb > and cpia2 drivers are all marked as V4L1 only, while all support V4L2! > The cpia2 driver supports both v4l1 and v4l2. I can test this driv

Re: RFC: Phase 1: Proposal to convert V4L1 drivers

2010-03-20 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hans de Goede added support for the quickcam_messenger to gspca, so that > driver > is scheduled for removal. Devin has hardware to test the vicam driver. David > Ellingsworth has hardware to test the ibmcam driver. It would be great if > Dev

Re: RFC: Phase 1: Proposal to convert V4L1 drivers

2010-03-20 Thread Gerard Klaver
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 09:58 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all, > > > - ov511 > - ovcamchip > - w9968cf > - stv680 > > Conclusion: > > These drivers have no hardware to test with: bw-qcam, c-qcam, arv, w9966. > However, all four should be easy to convert to v4l2, even without hardware. > Vol

RFC: Phase 1: Proposal to convert V4L1 drivers

2010-03-20 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi all, Well, I certainly fired everyone up with my RFC. Based on the replies I got I do think the time is right to start the removal process. Phase 1 would be to convert the remaining V4L1 drivers. To see what needs to be done I decided to analyse the remaining V4L1 drivers: - usbvideo (really