Hi Vitaly,
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>>
>> Check out patch no. 9:
>
> sorry for the confusion. However, I guess if the platform doesn't
> supply this value, we'll just consider it 0? Without any warning,
> right?
>
Hi Ohad,
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>
> Check out patch no. 9:
sorry for the confusion. However, I guess if the platform doesn't
supply this value, we'll just consider it 0? Without any warning,
right?
The problem is, we can't really distinguish between this field not
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Also, specifically to 12xx, I'd like to see REF_CLOCK moved on and
> have this set by platform too (I haven't found anything like that in
> the patches but maybe I've overlooked that).
Check out patch no. 9:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-ke
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Nicolas Pitre made a comment saying he wants to look at these patches
> more, are there other pending comments?
Yep, I'm feeling quite uncomfortable with the way platform data is
being passed over to sdio device now.
Also, specifically to 1
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Nicolas Pitre made a comment saying he wants to look at these patches
> more, are there other pending comments?
I plan to post a v3 series this week with some of the comments that
were already discussed after v2.
Thanks everyone for the atte
* Luciano Coelho [100802 11:10]:
> On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 21:30 +0200, ext John W. Linville wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:33:34PM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> > > This patch series adds native support for wl1271 on ZOOM.
> >
> > Just for the record, I'm fine with the wl1271 bits here goi
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 21:30 +0200, ext John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:33:34PM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> > This patch series adds native support for wl1271 on ZOOM.
>
> Just for the record, I'm fine with the wl1271 bits here going through
> the omap tree with the rest of
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:30 PM, John W. Linville
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:33:34PM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>> This patch series adds native support for wl1271 on ZOOM.
>
> Just for the record, I'm fine with the wl1271 bits here going through
> the omap tree with the rest of the se
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:33:34PM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> This patch series adds native support for wl1271 on ZOOM.
Just for the record, I'm fine with the wl1271 bits here going through
the omap tree with the rest of the series.
John
--
John W. LinvilleSomeday the world w
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>
>> This patch series adds native support for wl1271 on ZOOM.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>>
>> - introduce a fixed regulator device to control the power of wl1271
>> - allow to propagate private board-
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> This patch series adds native support for wl1271 on ZOOM.
>
> Changes since v1:
>
> - introduce a fixed regulator device to control the power of wl1271
> - allow to propagate private board-specific data to SDIO function drivers
> - allow SDIO function
This patch series adds native support for wl1271 on ZOOM.
Changes since v1:
- introduce a fixed regulator device to control the power of wl1271
- allow to propagate private board-specific data to SDIO function drivers
- allow SDIO function driver to control the card's power via new API
- make it
12 matches
Mail list logo
