Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On 29 August 2014 08:19, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 07:13:22AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> On 28 August 2014 12:08, Thierry Reding wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:57:29PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> On 27 August 2014 17:42, Maxime Ripard

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:46:03PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:11:41PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: [...] > > Then since firmware already knows what it set up it can tell the > > kernel to not touch those. > > Somehow, I've been raised kernel-wise into thinking that yo

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 07:13:22AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 28 August 2014 12:08, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:57:29PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> On 27 August 2014 17:42, Maxime Ripard > >> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:52:48A

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On 28 August 2014 12:08, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:57:29PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On 27 August 2014 17:42, Maxime Ripard >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:45:26AM +0200,

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: GPL Violations round-up

Speaking something wrong is worse than do nothing. If you are too serious about this problem, Aw will keep their mouth tight. Relax and try to communicate with them. Maybe Aw has made some improvements that we didn't know. Just blame his students is not a good teacher. On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:

Re: [linux-sunxi] Who is reviewing the sunxi-boards repo?

On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:04:24AM +0200, Dorian Meid wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering why there are so many unresponded pull requests for > sunxi-boars goning back till january without any discussion. > I don't wnat to complain, all of you are doing a great effort, I just > wonder. Which sp

[linux-sunxi] Cannot power off A13 tablet when connected to PC

Hello, I noticed problem with AXP in A13 tablets. When the tablet is connected to PC and powered from OTG port it cannot be powered off - it reboots instead. Note that Android displays battery charging animation in this case so the behaviour might be expected and should just be handled by acpi sc

[linux-sunxi] Who is reviewing the sunxi-boards repo?

Hello, I was wondering why there are so many unresponded pull requests for sunxi-boars goning back till january without any discussion. I don't wnat to complain, all of you are doing a great effort, I just wonder. Dorian Meid -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:11:41PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 05:42:21PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:45:26AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 0

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On 28 August 2014 18:34, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> On 28 August 2014 16:33, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven >>> wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:22 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com

Re: [linux-sunxi] GPL Violations round-up.

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 02:51:56PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 02:29:46PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > On 28 August 2014 13:57, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:07:46AM +0300, Simos Xenitellis wrote: > > >> It is indeed bad blood. Let's see a few

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:34:58PM -0400, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > > 2) Spend a day implementing a device specific fbdev driver that does > the correct thing all of the time. These drivers would sit in initrd > and load before the clock/regulator clean up shuts everything off. Use > the existin

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 28 August 2014 16:33, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:22 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com >>> wrote: > 2) We don't want to hardcode these clocks int

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On 28 August 2014 16:33, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven > wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:22 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com >> wrote: 2) We don't want to hardcode these clocks into the kernel (sunxi) clk driver, instead the bootloader shou

Re: [linux-sunxi] GPL Violations round-up.

On 28 August 2014 16:25, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 04:07:11PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> On 28 August 2014 14:51, Luc Verhaegen wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 02:29:46PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> > >> > Facts please. >> > >> > I know Oliver got sent a 50usd

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:33 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com > wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:22 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com >>> wrote: > 2) We don't want to hardcode th

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:33 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven > wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:22 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com >> wrote: 2) We don't want to hardcode these clocks into the kernel (sunxi) clk driver, instead the bootloa

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:22 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com > wrote: >>> 2) We don't want to hardcode these clocks into the kernel (sunxi) clk >>> driver, instead the bootloader should tell the kernel about these clocks. >>> >>> So the only p

Re: [linux-sunxi] GPL Violations round-up.

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 04:07:11PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 28 August 2014 14:51, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 02:29:46PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > > > Facts please. > > > > I know Oliver got sent a 50usd A33 tablet just now, even though he got > > told he wou

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:22 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: >> 2) We don't want to hardcode these clocks into the kernel (sunxi) clk >> driver, instead the bootloader should tell the kernel about these clocks. >> >> So the only point of discussion left seems to be how to do 2... > > Wouldn't it be

Re: [linux-sunxi] GPL Violations round-up.

On 28 August 2014 14:51, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 02:29:46PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> On 28 August 2014 13:57, Luc Verhaegen wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:07:46AM +0300, Simos Xenitellis wrote: >> >> It is indeed bad blood. Let's see a few: >> >> >> >> 1. "*

[linux-sunxi] Re: GPL Violations round-up

> So please stop attacking AW in this way. FWIW, I agree with Luc that it's important to bring this up and make sure that there's some positive movement on that front. Even if it's limited to splitting the blob into a "Free" glue code linked to a binary blob. And it doesn't have to get all fixed

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/27/2014 04:16 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > >>> The problems your talking about here all have to do with ordering how >>> things are enabled, but what we're talking about here is keeping things >>> enabled which are already e

Re: [linux-sunxi] GPL Violations round-up.

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 02:29:46PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 28 August 2014 13:57, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:07:46AM +0300, Simos Xenitellis wrote: > >> It is indeed bad blood. Let's see a few: > >> > >> 1. "*Allwinner does not

Re: [linux-sunxi] GPL Violations round-up.

On 28 August 2014 13:57, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:07:46AM +0300, Simos Xenitellis wrote: >> It is indeed bad blood. Let's see a few: >> >> 1. "*Allwinner does not actively >> participate in or support this community. In fact, it is violat

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

Hi, On 08/27/2014 04:16 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: >> The problems your talking about here all have to do with ordering how >> things are enabled, but what we're talking about here is keeping things >> enabled which are already enabled by the bootloader, so there is no >> ordering problem. > >

Re: [linux-sunxi] GPL Violations round-up.

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:07:46AM +0300, Simos Xenitellis wrote: > It is indeed bad blood. Let's see a few: > > 1. "*Allwinner does not actively > participate in or support this community. In fact, it is violating the > GPLv2 license

Re: [linux-sunxi] A31 development board

> > I ordered a devboard based on A31S (not A31) for 44USD, still waiting for > it: > > > http://www.aliexpress.com/item/quad-core-Allwinner-A31s-PCBA-board-1G-DDRIII-8G-NAND-FLASH-support-wifi-video-recording-playback/1989262018.html > > > I think A31S is a stripped down version of A31 (proba

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On 28 August 2014 12:11, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 05:42:21PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:45:26AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 08:54:41AM +0200, Th

Re: [linux-sunxi] GPL Violations round-up.

Le jeudi 28 août 2014 à 10:07 +0300, Simos Xenitellis a écrit : > It is indeed bad blood. Let's see a few: What exactly is your point here? Who cares that GPL violations personally annoy people in addition to being damaging to our community? And when that is the case, how exactly is it not legitim

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 05:42:21PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:45:26AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 08:54:41AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:57:29PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > Hello, > > On 27 August 2014 17:42, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:45:26AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 08:

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] sunxi: Generic A13_MID dram config, TZX-Q8-713B6 and TZX-Q8-713B7 support

> This is not quite right. If you enable ODT, then the 'zq' settings are > taken into use to configure the impedance. And the 0x7b (or 123 in the > decimal format) is just the default reset value for the hardware > register. It does not seem to make much sense, because it is pretty far > away from

Re: [linux-sunxi] A31 development board

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:06:46 -0700 (PDT) > TsvetanUsunov wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> we just assembled our first A31-SOM prototypes and they work fine with >> Android. >> http://olimex.wordpress.com/2014/08/19/our-first-a31-som-quad-core-arm-

Re: [linux-sunxi] A31 development board

> > > Do I understand it right that these spare boards are specifically > allocated for the developers willing to work on merging the sun6i > code into the sunxi-3.4 kernel? > > I just write that we have few spare boards, if one want to develop but have no hardware we can provide > Not ever

Re: [linux-sunxi] A31 development board

> > Great news! > > How are you wiring up the power for the I/O pins? > It'd be great if we had a seperate regulator for VCC-PF, > so we could run the SD card at 1.8V and do faster UHS-1 speeds. > > > Cheers > ChenYu > hi VCC-PF is connected to 3.3V Tsvetan -- You received this message

Re: [linux-sunxi] A31 development board

On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:06:46 -0700 (PDT) TsvetanUsunov wrote: > Hi, > > we just assembled our first A31-SOM prototypes and they work fine with > Android. > http://olimex.wordpress.com/2014/08/19/our-first-a31-som-quad-core-arm-cortex-a7-system-on-module-prototypes-work-fine/ > We have 3 spare A

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] sunxi: Generic A13_MID dram config, TZX-Q8-713B6 and TZX-Q8-713B7 support

On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:24:41 +0200 Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski > --- > board/sunxi/Makefile |4 +++- > board/sunxi/dram_a13_mid.c | 31 > -- > board/sunxi/dram_sun5i_408_512_busw16_iow8.c |

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] a13: TZX-Q8-713B7 support

On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:08:08 +0200 Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski > --- > sys_config/a13/tzx-q8-713b7.fex | 653 > +++ > 1 file changed, 653 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 sys_config/a13/tzx-q8-713b7.fex > > diff --git a/s

Re: [linux-sunxi] Overclocking A31 (higher than 1008MHz)

On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 05:43:04 -0700 (PDT) RFat wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to overclock the A31 higher than 1008MHz Are you fine with the deterioration of reliability and/or overheating under high load? > and I am getting deterioration in performance. > > The way I work is execute a smal

Re: [linux-sunxi] GPL Violations round-up.

It is indeed bad blood. Let's see a few: 1. "*Allwinner does not actively participate in or support this community. In fact, it is violating the GPLv2 license in several ways and has so far not shown willingness to resolve