On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Oliver O'Halloran writes:
>
>> The workaround for the CELL timebase bug does not correctly mark cr0 as
>> being clobbered. This can result in GCC making some poor^W completely
>> broken optimisations.
>
> Fruit 'n oats, how did we never n
Segher Boessenkool writes:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 09:50:06PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Oliver O'Halloran writes:
>>
>> > The workaround for the CELL timebase bug does not correctly mark cr0 as
>> > being clobbered. This can result in GCC making some poor^W completely
>> > bro
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 09:50:06PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Oliver O'Halloran writes:
>
> > The workaround for the CELL timebase bug does not correctly mark cr0 as
> > being clobbered. This can result in GCC making some poor^W completely
> > broken optimisations.
>
> Fruit 'n oats,
Oliver O'Halloran writes:
> The workaround for the CELL timebase bug does not correctly mark cr0 as
> being clobbered. This can result in GCC making some poor^W completely
> broken optimisations.
Fruit 'n oats, how did we never notice that? Luck I guess. Or subtle
breakage that no one could pin
The workaround for the CELL timebase bug does not correctly mark cr0 as
being clobbered. This can result in GCC making some poor^W completely
broken optimisations.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --gi