On Jul 11, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
./p2020rdb_camp_core1.dts
./p1020rdb-pc_camp_core1.dts
./mpc8572ds_camp_core1.dts
./p2020rdb_camp_core0.dts
./p1020rdb-pc_camp_core0.dts
./mpc8572ds_camp_core0.dts
./p1020rdb_camp_c
Kumar Gala wrote:
>> >
>> >./p2020rdb_camp_core1.dts
>> >./p1020rdb-pc_camp_core1.dts
>> >./mpc8572ds_camp_core1.dts
>> >./p2020rdb_camp_core0.dts
>> >./p1020rdb-pc_camp_core0.dts
>> >./mpc8572ds_camp_core0.dts
>> >./p1020rdb_camp_core1.dts
>> >./p1020rdb_camp_core0.dts
>> >
> I'd be ok if we want
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> No, I think we should have at least one or two examples of AMP dts in
>> upstream.
>
> We have more than that:
>
> ./p2020rdb_camp_core1.dts
> ./p1020rdb-pc_camp_core1.dts
> ./mpc8572ds_camp_core1.dts
> ./p2020rdb_camp_core0
Kumar Gala wrote:
> No, I think we should have at least one or two examples of AMP dts in
> upstream.
We have more than that:
./p2020rdb_camp_core1.dts
./p1020rdb-pc_camp_core1.dts
./mpc8572ds_camp_core1.dts
./p2020rdb_camp_core0.dts
./p1020rdb-pc_camp_core0.dts
./mpc8572ds_camp_core0.dts
./p102
Schneider, Kolja wrote:
>
> Is there any alternate source for AMP device trees? Just in case someone
> needs some sort of documentation?
The SDK. We can put a hundred AMP device trees on there if we want, and
no one will complain.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Since we already have P1021RDB-PC w/AMP support in upstream I agree we don't
>> need another example on P1021RDB-PC.
>
> Would you accept a patch that removes all AMP device trees from upstream?
> I just don't think that thes
> Kumar Gala wrote:
> > Since we already have P1021RDB-PC w/AMP support in upstream I agree
> we don't need another example on P1021RDB-PC.
>
> Would you accept a patch that removes all AMP device trees from upstream?
> I just don't think that these very customer-specific dts files belong
> upstr
Kumar Gala wrote:
> Since we already have P1021RDB-PC w/AMP support in upstream I agree we don't
> need another example on P1021RDB-PC.
Would you accept a patch that removes all AMP device trees from upstream?
I just don't think that these very customer-specific dts files belong
upstream.
--
T
On Jul 10, 2012, at 7:25 AM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Xu Jiucheng
> wrote:
>> Create the dts files for each core and splits the devices between
>> the two cores for P1021RDB-PC.
>>
>> Core0 has l2, serial0, i2c, spi, gpio, tdm,dma, usb, eth0, eth1,
>> sdhc, c
On 07/10/2012 03:39 AM, Xu Jiucheng wrote:
> + crypto@3 {
> +status = "disabled";
> +};
Whitespace.
> +
> + mpic: pic@4 {
> + protected-sources = <
> + 16 /* ecm, mem, L2,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Xu Jiucheng wrote:
> Create the dts files for each core and splits the devices between
> the two cores for P1021RDB-PC.
>
> Core0 has l2, serial0, i2c, spi, gpio, tdm,dma, usb, eth0, eth1,
> sdhc, crypto, global-util, message, pci0, pci1, msi, crypto.
> Core1 has l
Create the dts files for each core and splits the devices between
the two cores for P1021RDB-PC.
Core0 has l2, serial0, i2c, spi, gpio, tdm,dma, usb, eth0, eth1,
sdhc, crypto, global-util, message, pci0, pci1, msi, crypto.
Core1 has l2, serial1, eth2.
Signed-off-by: Xu Jiucheng
Signed-off-by: Ma
12 matches
Mail list logo
