yes i mean vlan tagging.
ok understood, thank you very much!
On Jan 22, 2014 3:45 PM, "Giles Coochey" wrote:
> On 22/01/2014 13:19, Yannis Milios wrote:
>
>> >The routing between the VLANs should be done by pfsense.<
>>
>> So that means in my case that all (3) virtual nics should be bridged to
>>
On 22/01/2014 13:19, Yannis Milios wrote:
>The routing between the VLANs should be done by pfsense.<
So that means in my case that all (3) virtual nics should be bridged
to the server's (1) physical nic and
all vlan routing should be managed by virtual pfsense?
When you say "vlan routing" you
>The routing between the VLANs should be done by pfsense.<
So that means in my case that all (3) virtual nics should be bridged to the
server's (1) physical nic and
all vlan routing should be managed by virtual pfsense?
>
>
___
List mailing list
Lis
On 22/01/2014 13:06, Yannis Milios wrote:
Hello friends,
I am planning following setup and I would like your opinion if this
kind of setup can work:
http://i41.tinypic.com/24fzocn.png
What I want to achieve is having a pfsense vm on a linux box which
will act as router/firewall for lan work
Hello friends,
I am planning following setup and I would like your opinion if this kind of
setup can work:
http://i41.tinypic.com/24fzocn.png
What I want to achieve is having a pfsense vm on a linux box which will act
as router/firewall for lan workstations.
There is just one vlan capable switch
