RE: Client Profiles (was Re: Open issues for 1.2.10 release)

2011-08-15 Thread Roy Chastain
August 15, 2011 02:29 To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org Subject: Client Profiles (was Re: Open issues for 1.2.10 release) On 2011-08-15, Dominik Psenner wrote: > The other big story is the support for the .NET client profiles. As I > understood it, we have to drop everything in log4net th

Re: Client Profiles (was Re: Open issues for 1.2.10 release)

2011-08-15 Thread Dominik Psenner
On 08/15/2011 08:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Right now the NAnt build builds several different assemblies targeting > different platforms all out of the same source tree and it should be > straight forward to extend that to the client profile as well. > > Tasos' patch basically works the same w

Client Profiles (was Re: Open issues for 1.2.10 release)

2011-08-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-08-15, Dominik Psenner wrote: > The other big story is the support for the .NET client profiles. As I > understood it, we have to drop everything in log4net that is not > supported in a .NET 4.0 client profile (i.e. references to System.Web). > To achieve this we have at least two options:

Re: Open issues for 1.2.10 release

2011-08-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-08-13, Dominik Psenner wrote: > There are 9 open issues targeted for 1.2.10. They should probably be > rescheduled to be included in 1.2.11? I've just been granted enough JIRA karma to at least re-assign those issues to 1.2.11 (but can't create new versions, yet). Without even reading th

Re: Open issues for 1.2.10 release

2011-08-14 Thread Dominik Psenner
On 08/13/2011 04:46 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > I'm not even sure whether some of them still are relevant. They > certainly need to be rescheduled. > > My preference would be to have some release like 1.2.MAINTNENANCE that > we'd assign things to that may eventually get fixed in a 1.2.x release >

Re: Open issues for 1.2.10 release

2011-08-13 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-08-13, Dominik Psenner wrote: > There are 9 open issues targeted for 1.2.10. They should probably be > rescheduled to be included in 1.2.11? I'm not even sure whether some of them still are relevant. They certainly need to be rescheduled. My preference would be to have some release like

Open issues for 1.2.10 release

2011-08-13 Thread Dominik Psenner
There are 9 open issues targeted for 1.2.10. They should probably be rescheduled to be included in 1.2.11? This list includes: * LOG4NET-285 * LOG4NET-274 * LOG4NET-227 * LOG4NET-221 * LOG4NET-211 * LOG4NET-258 * LOG4NET-235 * LOG4NET-236 * LOG4NET-237 Please discuss. -- Dominik Psenner ## Open