On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 23:01, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* the hatter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I will open the bidding with a 486DX2-66 Running Debian 2.2 (still
working as a firewall/NAT)
I see your dx2-66, and raise(/lower) you my dx2-50. Curses, if onlyI
hadn't found that machine in
At 22:37 20/01/03, you wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Shevek wrote:
I just gave away a 386/8MHz which ran it. Slackware 4.0.
386/8MHz ? Thee were lucky lad !
When I were a boy I had to make do with an abacus !
Just had a friendly argument with a hitchhikers fan as to whether or not an
abacus
On Tuesday, January 21, 2003 3:35 PM, Alex McLintock [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
At 22:37 20/01/03, you wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Shevek wrote:
I just gave away a 386/8MHz which ran it. Slackware 4.0.
386/8MHz ? Thee were lucky lad !
When I were a boy I had to make do with an
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 03:35:06PM +, Alex McLintock wrote:
Just had a friendly argument with a hitchhikers fan as to whether or not an
abacus was
a digital or analogue computer.
Digital, clearly, as it can not represent values over a continuous range,
only discrete values across that
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 03:35:06PM +, Alex McLintock wrote:
Just had a friendly argument with a hitchhikers fan as to whether or not an
abacus was
a digital or analogue computer.
Digital, clearly, as it can not represent values over a continuous
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 01:38:47AM +, Piers Cawley wrote:
Paul Makepeace [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 06:25:34PM +, Shevek wrote:
I'd have to check my P60s to find out the exact dates.
Wow, I thought my PII-233 was old!
386SX/25 ran my first linux box.
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Patrick Mulvany wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 01:38:47AM +, Piers Cawley wrote:
Paul Makepeace [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 06:25:34PM +, Shevek wrote:
I'd have to check my P60s to find out the exact dates.
Wow, I thought my
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Patrick Mulvany wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 06:25:34PM +, Shevek wrote:
I'd have to check my P60s to find out the exact dates.
Wow, I thought my PII-233 was old!
386SX/25 ran my first linux box. But I think we've already done this.
I will open the
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Shevek wrote:
I just gave away a 386/8MHz which ran it. Slackware 4.0.
386/8MHz ? Thee were lucky lad !
When I were a boy I had to make do with an abacus !
An abacus ? Thee were lucky lad !
When I were a boy I had to make do with scratching in the dust with a
rusty nail
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 10:37:04PM +, Simon Wilcox wrote:
When I were a boy I had to make do with scratching in the dust with a
rusty nail !
[ Repeat until someone throws a dead parrot at you ]
http://www.smacdonald.com/songs/boy.html
Roger
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:01:45PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
Hmm, the 486 was around 93/94 wasnt it?
I had my first 486 when I started work in '90. It was a RM.
--
Natalie S. Ford . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
* the hatter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I will open the bidding with a 486DX2-66 Running Debian 2.2 (still
working as a firewall/NAT)
I see your dx2-66, and raise(/lower) you my dx2-50. Curses, if onlyI
hadn't found that machine in a skip a year or two back,
Hmm, the 486 was around
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:01:45PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* the hatter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I will open the bidding with a 486DX2-66 Running Debian 2.2 (still
working as a firewall/NAT)
I see your dx2-66, and raise(/lower) you my dx2-50. Curses, if onlyI
hadn't found
13 matches
Mail list logo