On 02/24/2015 05:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
commit b627b8701b6598f5402cbab55a83026c9e3b1e86
Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Date: Tue Feb 24 10:17:45 2015 +0100
Some performance stuff reported by cppcheck
I cannot use left
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> commit b627b8701b6598f5402cbab55a83026c9e3b1e86
> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Date: Tue Feb 24 10:17:45 2015 +0100
>
> Some performance stuff reported by cppcheck
I cannot use left and right cursor movements after this comm
I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement "rules" drive me nuts! I
dislike mousing, and prefer cursor-movement keys as more predictable and
requiring less conscious control. But the key-based motion actually feels quite
unpredictable and--- cruciall
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 02/24/2015 12:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/22/2015 03:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
0004-Allow-cloned-buffers-to-give-alerts-in-runLaTeX.patch
- This
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Some remarks:
>
> * in Text::insertChar, you do not test for typewriter font. Why is that?
> What do you expect with LyX-Code, for example?
You are right, I forgot that.
> * I still think that cycling would be good, that is \emdash+minus=>minus.
OK, I'll implement
José Matos wrote:
> One cosmetic change that I would like to propose is to change the
> condition
>
> + if len(words) > 1 and words[0] == "\\begin_inset" and \
> +(words[1] == "ERT" or words[1] == "Formula" or words[1] == "IPA"):
>
> to
>
> + if len(words) > 1 and words[0] == "\\begin_inset
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Georg, please check, this is recent code of yours.
The new code works as well as the old one. I think this is an area where
coverity could improve.
Georg
On 02/24/2015 12:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 02/22/2015 03:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
0004-Allow-cloned-buffers-to-give-alerts-in-runLaTeX.patch
- This is the patch I am least confident about. Conditioning on
!buffer.isClone() caused
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 02/22/2015 03:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> 0004-Allow-cloned-buffers-to-give-alerts-in-runLaTeX.patch
>> - This is the patch I am least confident about. Conditioning on
>> !buffer.isClone() caused the condition to always fail so the
On 02/22/2015 03:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
0004-Allow-cloned-buffers-to-give-alerts-in-runLaTeX.patch
- This is the patch I am least confident about. Conditioning on
!buffer.isClone() caused the condition to always fail so the alerts
were never shown. Is that conditioning still needed? I don'
10 matches
Mail list logo