Re: Discussion: document class and fonts for manuals

2013-01-13 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:54 AM, John R. Hudson wrote: > On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 16:53 +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> Am 13.01.2013 09:55, schrieb John R. Hudson: >> >> > Since my last mail to the list, I have completed about two thirds of the >> > UserGuide; my plan was to go on to the Alternatives ma

Re: Discussion: document class and fonts for manuals

2013-01-13 Thread John R. Hudson
On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 16:53 +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 13.01.2013 09:55, schrieb John R. Hudson: > > > Since my last mail to the list, I have completed about two thirds of the > > UserGuide; my plan was to go on to the Alternatives manual after that > > and I will then look at Customization. >

Re: Discussion: document class and fonts for manuals

2013-01-13 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 13.01.2013 09:55, schrieb John R. Hudson: Since my last mail to the list, I have completed about two thirds of the UserGuide; my plan was to go on to the Alternatives manual after that and I will then look at Customization. So you only revised the language (writing style), right? That is fi

Re: Discussion: document class and fonts for manuals

2013-01-13 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 13.01.2013 09:55, schrieb John R. Hudson: Since my last mail to the list, I have completed about two thirds of the UserGuide; my plan was to go on to the Alternatives manual after that and I will then look at Customization. So you only revised the language (writing style), right? That is fi

Re: Discussion: document class and fonts for manuals

2013-01-13 Thread John R. Hudson
On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 04:24 +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 08.01.2013 10:30, schrieb John R. Hudson: > > > I have some time to go through the documentation and I wondered if we > > should change the default document class to article KOMA Script and the > > default fonts to Latin Modern. > > Hi John