On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Hey Bruce
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Pourciau
bruce.h.pourc...@lawrence.edu wrote:
Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as
Aldus or
Renaissance
As far as I understand, Aldus is a book weight version of
On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Hey Bruce
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Pourciau
bruce.h.pourc...@lawrence.edu wrote:
Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as
Aldus or
Renaissance
As far as I understand, Aldus is a book weight version of
On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Hey Bruce
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Pourciau
wrote:
Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as
Aldus or
Renaissance
As far as I understand, Aldus is a book weight version of
On 2011-04-07, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
Dear list members,
I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
in ff, fi, ...).
Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.
Looking at the URW
On 2011-04-07, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
... the \usepackage{tgpagella} allowed me to get nicely linked ff.
Definitely an improvement. Maybe LyX could load _this_ package for
Palatino fonts, if it just
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Guenter Milde wrote:
Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.
There is not much change in the standard Postscript fonts. Especially,
considering the emphasis that TeX puts on consistent rendering of
unchanged documents, there will be no change without
On Apr 8, 2011, at 1:31 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.
This is one of the many, many reasons why the typographic world would
be a prettier place if Word folks would use Palatino, rather than
Times, as the default typeface. Not only
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
This is one of the many, many reasons why the typographic world would be a
prettier place if Word folks would use Palatino, rather than Times,
Bruce,
They either use Times or the default san-serif face as a body text font.
Ugly and hard to read.
Hey Bruce
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Pourciau
bruce.h.pourc...@lawrence.edu wrote:
Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as Aldus or
Renaissance
As far as I understand, Aldus is a book weight version of Palatino,
hence more readable. Do you know if URW++ or
On 2011-04-07, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
Dear list members,
I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
in ff, fi, ...).
Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.
Looking at the URW
On 2011-04-07, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
... the \usepackage{tgpagella} allowed me to get nicely linked ff.
Definitely an improvement. Maybe LyX could load _this_ package for
Palatino fonts, if it just
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Guenter Milde wrote:
Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.
There is not much change in the standard Postscript fonts. Especially,
considering the emphasis that TeX puts on consistent rendering of
unchanged documents, there will be no change without
On Apr 8, 2011, at 1:31 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.
This is one of the many, many reasons why the typographic world would
be a prettier place if Word folks would use Palatino, rather than
Times, as the default typeface. Not only
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
This is one of the many, many reasons why the typographic world would be a
prettier place if Word folks would use Palatino, rather than Times,
Bruce,
They either use Times or the default san-serif face as a body text font.
Ugly and hard to read.
Hey Bruce
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Pourciau
bruce.h.pourc...@lawrence.edu wrote:
Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as Aldus or
Renaissance
As far as I understand, Aldus is a book weight version of Palatino,
hence more readable. Do you know if URW++ or
On 2011-04-07, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> Dear list members,
> I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
> noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
> in ff, fi, ...).
Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by desig
On 2011-04-07, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> ... the \usepackage{tgpagella} allowed me to get nicely linked "ff".
> Definitely an improvement. Maybe LyX could load _this_ package for
> Palatino fonts,
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Guenter Milde wrote:
Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.
There is not much change in the standard Postscript fonts. Especially,
considering the emphasis that TeX puts on consistent rendering of
unchanged documents, there will be no change without
On Apr 8, 2011, at 1:31 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.
This is one of the many, many reasons why the typographic world would
be a prettier place if Word folks would use Palatino, rather than
Times, as the default typeface. Not only
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
This is one of the many, many reasons why the typographic world would be a
prettier place if Word folks would use Palatino, rather than Times,
Bruce,
They either use Times or the default san-serif face as a body text font.
Ugly and hard to read.
Hey Bruce
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Pourciau
wrote:
> Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as Aldus or
> Renaissance
>
As far as I understand, Aldus is a book weight version of Palatino,
hence more readable. Do you know if URW++
Dear list members,
I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
in ff, fi, ...).
However, the various dashes (--, ---) do get linked properly. Aren't
these ligatures?
What do you think of this? I
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
Dear list members,
I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
in ff, fi, ...).
Not an expert, but they seem to appear when
First, thanks for your reply.
Liviu Andronic wrote:
[...]
I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
in ff, fi, ...).
Not an expert, but they seem to appear when using TeX Gyre Pagella, a
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
ff (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).
However, I don't see any ligature between f and i, either in fi or
ffi.
(I am under 1.6.9 so I
Thanks, that did the trick.
I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...
Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
ff (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
Thanks, that did the trick.
I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...
Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
[1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/
Liviu,
Maybe it's my old eyeballs, but I don't see differences in the ligatures
in the standard Palatino and the enhanced version. As a matter of fact, the
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
[1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/
Liviu,
Maybe it's my old eyeballs, but I don't see differences in the ligatures
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you will
clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less ligature
pixels than the Pagella. The latter features a solid black line in the
'ff' ligature, and an almost
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you will
clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less ligature
pixels than the Pagella. The
Dear list members,
I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
in ff, fi, ...).
However, the various dashes (--, ---) do get linked properly. Aren't
these ligatures?
What do you think of this? I
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
Dear list members,
I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
in ff, fi, ...).
Not an expert, but they seem to appear when
First, thanks for your reply.
Liviu Andronic wrote:
[...]
I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
in ff, fi, ...).
Not an expert, but they seem to appear when using TeX Gyre Pagella, a
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
ff (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).
However, I don't see any ligature between f and i, either in fi or
ffi.
(I am under 1.6.9 so I
Thanks, that did the trick.
I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...
Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
ff (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
Thanks, that did the trick.
I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...
Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
[1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/
Liviu,
Maybe it's my old eyeballs, but I don't see differences in the ligatures
in the standard Palatino and the enhanced version. As a matter of fact, the
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
[1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/
Liviu,
Maybe it's my old eyeballs, but I don't see differences in the ligatures
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you will
clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less ligature
pixels than the Pagella. The latter features a solid black line in the
'ff' ligature, and an almost
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you will
clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less ligature
pixels than the Pagella. The
Dear list members,
I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
in ff, fi, ...).
However, the various dashes (--, ---) do get linked properly. Aren't
these "ligatures"?
What do you think of this? I
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> Dear list members,
>
> I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
> noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
> in ff, fi, ...).
>
Not an expert, but they seem to
First, thanks for your reply.
Liviu Andronic wrote:
[...]
> > I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
> > noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
> > in ff, fi, ...).
> >
> Not an expert, but they seem to appear when using TeX Gyre
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
> "ff" (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).
>
> However, I don't see any ligature between "f" and "i", either in "fi" or
> "ffi".
>
> (I am
Thanks, that did the trick.
I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> > Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
> > "ff" (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> Thanks, that did the trick.
>
> I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...
>
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
>> > Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
[1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/
Liviu,
Maybe it's my old eyeballs, but I don't see differences in the ligatures
in the standard Palatino and the enhanced version. As a matter of fact, the
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>
>> See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
>> [1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/
>
> Liviu,
>
> Maybe it's my old eyeballs, but I don't see differences in
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you will
clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less "ligature
pixels" than the Pagella. The latter features a solid black line in the
'ff' ligature, and an almost
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you will
>> clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less "ligature
>> pixels" than the
51 matches
Mail list logo