Re: Long build?

> On Nov 6, 2018, at 10:27 AM, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > > >> On Nov 6, 2018, at 7:15 AM, Adam Dershowitz > <mailto:de...@alum.mit.edu>> wrote: >> >> touch -r dvisvgm.txt.in dvisvgm.txt > > Hangs on a touch, it appears. > > Whe

Re: Long build?

/usr/bin/sed --Adam > On Nov 6, 2018, at 11:49 AM, wrote: > > Interesting, what is the output of the following? > > $ which -a sed > > > Cheers! > Frank > >> On Nov 6, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Adam Dershowitz > <mailto:de...@alum.mit.edu>> wrote

Re: Long build?

e this morning. I halted the > job, restarted it in verbose mode, and it finished. > >> On Nov 6, 2018, at 8:49 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> I’ve done that. It just shows make at 98.8% cpu. When I’ve tried to >> sample, I get a call chain that has a lot of ??? (in ma

Re: Long build?

see what's eating up the clock. > Activity Monitor or ps to see what's running. Possibly sample the process > that's stuck .to see what it's doing. > > Ken > >> On Nov 6, 2018, at 06:31, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Nov

Re: Long build?

> On Nov 6, 2018, at 1:17 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > Dear Adam, > > On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 at 05:24, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> I’m upgrading dvisvgm from to 2.3.4_4 to 2.6.1_0. I’m on a fairly recent >> MacBook pro, and it has been building for 13 hour

Long build?

I’m upgrading dvisvgm from to 2.3.4_4 to 2.6.1_0. I’m on a fairly recent MacBook pro, and it has been building for 13 hours! The process is “make” and it’s taking 100% of just one CPU. Does this sound correct? Should I just kill it and clean the port, then retry? Even building gcc from sour

Find Universal?

Is there a way to find what base ports that I have installed are universal? I have ended up with a lot of ports that are universal variants. I think that there are actually few, if any ports, that I have currently installed that need to be universal, but a while back I had a port or two that n

Re: How reconcile openmodelica-dvel & octave dependencies on sundials vs. sundials2

It took me a while to actually try this. But, it does seem to work fine. I would encourage someone to push this change to the port file. Thanks for creating this diff. --Adam > On Jun 6, 2018, at 1:20 AM, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > Adam, Murray -- This small patch will patch the octave

Re: How reconcile openmodelica-dvel & octave dependencies on sundials vs. sundials2

th > a variant. > > you could disable sundials in octave if you don't want or need it (again, > maybe a variant). > > > ... > > > On 2018-06-04, at 5:49 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > >> I’m in the same situation (I have openmodelica-devel installed an

Re: How reconcile openmodelica-dvel & octave dependencies on sundials vs. sundials2

I’m in the same situation (I have openmodelica-devel installed and want to upgrade octave). The odd thing is that octave 4.2.2 was working fine with sundials (which is version 3.1.0_1). But, the upgrade of octave to 4.4 requires the sundials2 port (2.7.0). So, somehow it seems that upgrading

Re: OpenModelica?

or > apache, mysql, php, phpmyadmin, that I’d hate to set up again; that could > take days. Unless I misunderstand what Ken said.) > >> On 16 Apr2018, at 3:55 PM, Adam Dershowitz > <mailto:de...@alum.mit.edu>> wrote: >> >> As an datapoint, but not completely

Re: OpenModelica?

; > So they recomend using the atlas port of octace (hence of arpack and > SparseSuite, too, I presume). > >> On 16 Apr2018, at 3:55 PM, Adam Dershowitz > <mailto:de...@alum.mit.edu>> wrote: >> >> As an datapoint, but not completely answering your que

Re: OpenModelica?

As an datapoint, but not completely answering your question. I have the following installed and all working: sundials @3.1.0_1+accelerate+fortran_klu+gfortran+mpich (active) octave @4.2.2_1+accelerate+app+docs+fltk+gfortran+graphicsmagick+qt4+sound (active) SuiteSparse @4.2.1_4+accelerate (acti

Re: OpenModelica?

> On Apr 7, 2018, at 4:34 PM, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > > >> On Apr 7, 2018, at 1:13 PM, Murray Eisenberg >> wrote: > > With a small change in the openmodelica-devel Portfile that I did prior to > starting the build (so it would use gcc7 for fortran), all of > openmodelica-devel built

Re: OpenModelica?

> On Apr 7, 2018, at 4:02 PM, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > > >> On Apr 7, 2018, at 12:54 PM, Murray Eisenberg > > wrote: >> >> Ouch, yes, my disastrous typo in the repository name, sorry. (The first time >> I tried, without using "sudo su -“, I had copied t

Re: OpenModelica?

I’m not sure why you would go to Mathematic, as you can simulate them just fine in OpenModelica, if you want. --Adam > On Apr 7, 2018, at 3:54 PM, Murray Eisenberg > wrote: > > Ouch, yes, my disastrous typo in the repository name, sorry. (The first time > I tried, without using "sudo su

Re: OpenModelica?

Did you mistype the echo command? The rsync says build DOT openmodelica.org while the error shows build HYPHEN openmodelca.org --Adam > On Apr 7, 2018, at 2:56 PM, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > > >> On Apr 7, 2018, at 11:51 AM, Ryan Schmidt > > wrote: >> >>

Re: OpenModelica?

> On Apr 7, 2018, at 1:17 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > On Apr 7, 2018, at 11:27, Murray Eisenberg wrote: > >> Thanks, that seems to have worked. >> >> To do the remaining steps… >> >> port selfupdate >> port install gcc44 # With the addition of llvm/clang as the default compiler >> in XCo

Re: OpenModelica?

> On Apr 7, 2018, at 1:53 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > On Apr 7, 2018, at 12:49, Ken Cunningham wrote: > >> sounds like this software needs a port and a maintainer! > > It already has a port, and a collection of hundreds of related ports, in an > entirely separate ports collection that the

Re: sqlite[d]browser

Yes, that is a useful port. I would like to see it updated. Thanks --Adam > On Jul 8, 2017, at 8:22 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > Hello, > > Any users of the old sqlitedbrowser port? > > I've prepared a new port for the Qt5 version of an up-to-date comparable > application (sqlitebrows

Re: Check for binaries

t you only want to install binaries. > > sudo port -b install my-big-port > > will install the binary if it exists, or abort. > > > Ken > > > > On 2017-03-28, at 1:34 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > >> Is there any way to check if a specific port wil

Re: Check for binaries

> On Mar 28, 2017, at 4:42 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Adam Dershowitz <mailto:de...@alum.mit.edu>> wrote: > Is there any way to check if a specific port will be installed as a binary or > built from source. > > The probl

Check for binaries

Is there any way to check if a specific port will be installed as a binary or built from source. I’m looking for a flag that would just check if a binary is available for my particular configuration? I’m looking for something similar to “dry run” (-y). I did try -y on the hopes that it would

Re: Wine 2.0 is broken

Although the specific dll mentioned is different, it looks a lot like this known issue: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/53244 --Adam > On Feb 1, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Giuseppe Di Matteo > wrote: > > Hello, > > I have installed wine 2.0 on MacOS Sierr

Re: MacPorts 2.4.0 has been released

> On Jan 27, 2017, at 5:06 PM, Clemens Lang wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 04:28:46PM -0500, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> Got it. I was not comfortable running it, without knowing that. Now, >> I see that it is not at irreversible, without asking fir

Re: MacPorts 2.4.0 has been released

> On Jan 27, 2017, at 4:21 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > On Jan 27, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> I have another question about another new feature. >> Is there a way to see what port reclaim will do? It says that it doesn’t >> accept any switches

Re: MacPorts 2.4.0 has been released

> On Jan 27, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Clemens Lang wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 01:10:57PM -0500, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> I just tried port diagnose and I get the following: >> >> >> Checking for files installed by ports on disk... >> W

Re: MacPorts 2.4.0 has been released

> On Jan 27, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Clemens Lang wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 01:10:57PM -0500, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> I just tried port diagnose and I get the following: >> >> >> Checking for files installed by ports on disk... >> W

Re: MacPorts 2.4.0 has been released

Nice work on the new version. Thanks. I just tried port diagnose and I get the following: Checking for files installed by ports on disk... Warning: '/opt/local/libexec/cups/backend/cups-pdf' installed by port 'cups-pdf' is currently not readable. Please try again. If this problem persists, p

Re: MacPorts 2.4.0 has been released

Nice work on the new version. Thanks. I just tried port diagnose and I get the following: Checking for files installed by ports on disk... Warning: '/opt/local/libexec/cups/backend/cups-pdf' installed by port 'cups-pdf' is currently not readable. Please try again. If this problem persists, p

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 13, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > >> So, this suggests that there might be some combination of the long list of >> ports below that I could uninstall +universal, then install default, and >> that might allow wine to build? > > well, I was suggesting that you can even '

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:56 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:50 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >>> The dependency engine in MacPorts doesn't really handle variants, so I >>> always expect everything that does magic with variants to have problem

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:45 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2017, at 8:26 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> I uninstalled all ports, and then tried to just install my requested ports, >> with variants, that I wanted. Almost all were just default and none of >

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 12, 2017, at 4:41 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> But, if there are actually any ports that I have where +universal is the >> default, and is necessary, that would break them, and their chain of >> dep

Re: Migration issue

? --Adam > On Jan 12, 2017, at 11:04 AM, Russell Jones > wrote: > > > > On 11/01/17 18:04, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan 11, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Russell Jones < >>> <mailto:russell.jo...@physics.ox.ac.uk>russell.jo...@physics.ox.

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 11, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Russell Jones > wrote: > > > > On 06/01/17 17:37, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan 6, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Russell Jones < >>> <mailto:russell.jo...@physics.ox.ac.uk>russell.jo...@physics.ox.

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 6, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Russell Jones > wrote: > > On 06/01/17 14:28, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> >> > On Jan 6, 2017, at 9:04 AM, Russell Jones >> > <mailto:russell.jo...@physics.ox.ac.uk> wrote: >> > >> > On 06/01

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 6, 2017, at 2:20 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > >> On Jan 5, 2017, at 09:26, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> I just tried what you suggested for py27-numpy and it just activated without >> any error. > > Yes, there will not be an error a

Re: Migration issue

ion to get a dependency > error. Then do the same for the dependency, and so on back to the first port > built +universal. > > Russell > > On 05/01/17 14:56, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan 5, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Rainer Müller < >>> <m

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 5, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: > > On 2017-01-05 14:51, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan 4, 2017, at 10:02 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 4, 2017, at 07:52, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >>> >>>&

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 4, 2017, at 10:02 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Jan 4, 2017, at 07:52, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > >> So, yes it seems that the on the new machine I ended up with gcc6 being >> universal, so then cctools, ld64-latest, llvm-3.9 etc are all universal. >>

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 3, 2017, at 8:13 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > > Yes, xar. > That port actually got fixed quickly, so the specific problem is gone. > But, the situation still has me curious. Why should just moving myports.txt > end up with a bunch more universal ports on the ne

Re: Migration issue

EST, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Jan 2, 2017, at 14:12, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> I am trying to get an existing set of ports into a new machine. >> I ended up wiping /opt/local on the new machine, so I'm just using >the migration script and myports.txt.

Migration issue

I am trying to get an existing set of ports into a new machine. I ended up wiping /opt/local on the new machine, so I'm just using the migration script and myports.txt. So it is a fresh macports install. My problem seems to be that I had Xer installed on the old machine (2012 MacBook pro with OS

Re: jasper +universal fails

--Adam > On Dec 20, 2016, at 12:41 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > >> On Dec 20, 2016, at 08:27, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> On Dec 20, 2016, at 9:23 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Dec 20, 2

Re: jasper +universal fails

I see that Jasper went from 2.0.6_0 to 2.0.6_1 but it still fails to build for me. --Adam > On Dec 20, 2016, at 2:20 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > It was fixed: > > https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/caae5b2254cc2926741d09b222c9483b13515ed0 > > >> On Dec 19, 2016, at 07:40,