Mark Haury wrote:
> I'm using GPE myself, but I've spent 6 months trying to fix the botched
> data import. There's just no way to reliably import data or specify
> corresponding data fields.
Yes; the apps seem to have been designed by someone who has heard PIM
apps described, but has never seen
So say the rumors for next year's iPhone:
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/06/16/multi_core_arm_chips_bound_for_apples_next_gen_iphones.html
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Kevin T. Neely wrote:
> The ARM clock speed wall could very likely be surpassed by dual-coreing the
> processors
The ARM clock speed wall could very likely be surpassed by dual-coreing the
processors. The Symbian Foundation is already working on a dual core
version of their phone OS.
K
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mail
The SmartQ5 noted in the link below is one of those looks nice,
but Close to vaporware, worked, but slow because of processor
limitations. An "updated" version supposedly has the same limits, but
tweaks the size. http://www.dhgate.com/wholesale/smartq.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A
Mark wrote:
> Even if the form factor is the same, the processor etc. is supposed to
> be completely different. That's why Freemantle won't run on the
> current tablets without being ported. Aren't the current tablets
> OMAP2? The new versions will be OMAP3 and have 3D graphics acceleration.
True
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Gary wrote:
>
> That reminds me -- the N900 is supposed to include GPRS and HSPA but I
> don't see how that's any indication of it being more than a data device.
> Sure, it may be subsidized by carriers but so are a few net books now
> and they're not phones. Also
Dave Neary wrote:
> Mark, you've said your piece several times, don't feel obliged to repeat
> the same thing every time the N810 or the N900 come up on the list.
>
That reminds me -- the N900 is supposed to include GPRS and HSPA but I
don't see how that's any indication of it being more than
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:09:47AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jamie Bennett wrote:
> > On 15 Jun 2009, at 21:41, Mark wrote:
>
> Please guys, not every thread on maemo-users has to be a shouting match.
>
> Mark, you've said your piece several times, don't feel obliged to repeat
> the s
Hi,
Jamie Bennett wrote:
> On 15 Jun 2009, at 21:41, Mark wrote:
Please guys, not every thread on maemo-users has to be a shouting match.
Mark, you've said your piece several times, don't feel obliged to repeat
the same thing every time the N810 or the N900 come up on the list.
Jamie, you don
Peter Flynn wrote:
> Mark wrote:
> >> What's the replacement for the N810?
>
>
>> There is none. From the details they've given thus far, the next
>> generation of Maemo devices are going to be completely different than
>> the current tablets, with incompatible hardware therefore
>> software/O
En/na Peter Flynn ha escrit:
>
> So maybe I should have been more precise in my original question: Is
> there (or will there be soon) a pocket computer from some manufacturer
> (not necessarily Nokia) running a Unix-type OS of some description (not
> necessarily Maemo) that is broadly speaking
Mark wrote:
>> What's the replacement for the N810?
> There is none. From the details they've given thus far, the next
> generation of Maemo devices are going to be completely different than
> the current tablets, with incompatible hardware therefore
> software/OS.
I don't care if they are diff
I thought Mer was the branch started to run Freemantle and Ubuntu Jaunty
on N8X0 tablets; http://wiki.maemo.org/Mer
Now that netbooks are approaching the $200 mark, there's going to be a
lot of competition between them and smartphone and comparable mobile
devices at the same price point. In my opi
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Kevin T.
Neely wrote:
>
> I'm doing nothing of the kind. I took your metric: the SDK and simply
> compared the two of them.
You certainly are: I'm not using the SDK as a metric, Jamie is. I was
discounting that as a reliable metric.
> Also, Mark is once again doi
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Mark wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Kevin T.
> Neely wrote:
> > Note that the Palm Pre came out before the SDK was even readily
> available.
> > I'm not sure the SDK is a good metric.
> >
> You're comparing apples with oranges. The Palm Pre already has
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Kevin T.
Neely wrote:
> Note that the Palm Pre came out before the SDK was even readily available.
> I'm not sure the SDK is a good metric.
>
> Also, most of Mark's arguments tend toward the "Internet Tablet is not ready
> for end users". Taking that as a fact (for
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
>
>
> I don't think you can compare OpenMoko to Nokia.
>
Not until now, but they're headed that direction fast.
>>
>> They aren't freezing "the software", they're freezing the *development
>> environment* that is needed to create the software.
Note that the Palm Pre came out before the SDK was even readily available.
I'm not sure the SDK is a good metric.
Also, most of Mark's arguments tend toward the "Internet Tablet is not ready
for end users". Taking that as a fact (for sake of argument) then the
freezing of the SDK would be the bes
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Valerio Valerio wrote:
>
>
> Funny, so I have a non-existent OpenMoko[1] device :)
>
> [1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo_FreeRunner
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Valério Valério
>
> http://www.valeriovalerio.org
Yes, you do, in the sense that they still have a long way t
On 15 Jun 2009, at 22:30, Mark wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jamie Bennett
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I must of missed where 'Nokia Employees' hinted at June next year.
>>
>
> Apparently so...
Care to share some links?
>
>> I base my guess on a _beta_ SDK in practical feature freeze, an
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Mark wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> >
> >
> > I must of missed where 'Nokia Employees' hinted at June next year.
> >
>
> Apparently so...
>
> > I base my guess on a _beta_ SDK in practical feature freeze, an October
> > summit wi
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
>
>
> I must of missed where 'Nokia Employees' hinted at June next year.
>
Apparently so...
> I base my guess on a _beta_ SDK in practical feature freeze, an October
> summit with high levels of device information expectations, various
> commu
On 15 Jun 2009, at 22:00, Mark wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Jamie Bennett
> wrote:
>>
>> On 15 Jun 2009, at 21:41, Mark wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Peter
>>> Flynn
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>&g
Am Montag, den 15.06.2009, 15:00 -0600 schrieb Mark:
> > Another year? What is this based on?From the information that is currently
> > available your 'guess' seem way off to me.
> If you have something better, let's have it. Otherwise, people in
> glass houses shouldn't be throwing stones. My "gu
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
>
> On 15 Jun 2009, at 21:41, Mark wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Peter Flynn
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Lake Stevens Dental wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI, Buy.com ha
On 15 Jun 2009, at 21:41, Mark wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Peter
> Flynn wrote:
>>> Lake Stevens Dental wrote:
>>>> FYI, Buy.com has the n810 for $180.
>>>>
>>>> Which is another way of saying, the end of the n810 series is
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Peter Flynn wrote:
>> Lake Stevens Dental wrote:
>>> FYI, Buy.com has the n810 for $180.
>>>
>>> Which is another way of saying, the end of the n810 series is near...
>>> It's still a great little unit, as is the n8
> Lake Stevens Dental wrote:
>> FYI, Buy.com has the n810 for $180.
>>
>> Which is another way of saying, the end of the n810 series is near...
>> It's still a great little unit, as is the n800.
What's the replacement for the N810? My N800 is still going
FYI, Buy.com
has the n810 for $180.
Which is another way of saying, the end of the n810 series is near...
It's still a great little unit, as is the n800.
Wouldn't take a trip without it.
Always, Fred Chittenden
___
maemo-use
29 matches
Mail list logo