On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> 'Twas brillig, and Pascal Terjan at 04/09/12 17:57 did gyre and gimble:
>>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Romain d'Alverny
>>> wrote:
>>>
By the way, there are some builds t
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Pascal Terjan at 04/09/12 17:57 did gyre and gimble:
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
>>
>>> By the way, there are some builds that get a strangely reported build
>>> duration (15588 days; always
'Twas brillig, and Pascal Terjan at 04/09/12 17:57 did gyre and gimble:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Thierry Vignaud
>> wrote:
>>> On 4 September 2012 16:11, wrote:
Revision 5642 Author rda Date 2012-09-04 16:11:36 +0200 (Tue,
On Tuesday 04 September 2012 18:52, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
> By the way, there are some builds that get a strangely reported build
> duration (15588 days)
$ LC_ALL=C date --date '-15588 days'
Wed Dec 31 18:25:48 CET 1969
Now That would be a loong build time, it it weren't wrong. :-)=
--
Johnny
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Thierry Vignaud
> wrote:
>> On 4 September 2012 16:11, wrote:
>>> Revision 5642 Author rda Date 2012-09-04 16:11:36 +0200 (Tue, 04 Sep 2012)
>>>
>>> Log Message
>>>
>>> skip packages with no name
>>
>> Is
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Thierry Vignaud
wrote:
> On 4 September 2012 16:11, wrote:
>> Revision 5642 Author rda Date 2012-09-04 16:11:36 +0200 (Tue, 04 Sep 2012)
>>
>> Log Message
>>
>> skip packages with no name
>
> Is that possible?
Well, I am guilty of not having checked further why,
On 4 September 2012 16:11, wrote:
> Revision 5642 Author rda Date 2012-09-04 16:11:36 +0200 (Tue, 04 Sep 2012)
>
> Log Message
>
> skip packages with no name
Is that possible?
> Modified: build_system/web/test_index.php
> ===
> ---
