[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pallavi Palleti updated MAHOUT-99:
--
Attachment: Mahout-99.patch
Patch is modified to be compatible with latest trunk.
Thanks
Pallav
(I upgraded to 0.19.1 last week.)
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> OK, pending MAHOUT-110, I think we are good to go on the release. Not sure
> who volunteered to upgrade Hadoop, so go for it now, or it will wait until
> after 0.1.
D'oh!
Thanks!
On Mar 18, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
(I upgraded to 0.19.1 last week.)
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Grant Ingersoll
wrote:
OK, pending MAHOUT-110, I think we are good to go on the release.
Not sure
who volunteered to upgrade Hadoop, so go for it now, or it wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12682977#action_12682977
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on MAHOUT-110:
We good to go on this one, Sean? I'd like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12682980#action_12682980
]
Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-110:
--
I say go for it. I will merge with my patch locally an
Redirect Test output to file
Key: MAHOUT-111
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-111
Project: Mahout
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 0.2
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12682983#action_12682983
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on MAHOUT-110:
Will do. Thanks for the kick in the pants
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved MAHOUT-99.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.1
Committed revision 755548.
Thanks!
> Improving s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated MAHOUT-111:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 0.2)
0.1
> Redirect Test output to file
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved MAHOUT-111.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.1
Fixed
> Redirect Test output to file
> ---
On Mar 17, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Enis Soztutar wrote:
-Grant
Knowing nothing about the mahout build script(s), I think that
having both ant and maven scripts might prove to be problematic.
However keeping one module(taste) in ant will work. As a side note,
we have discussed this same thing in
http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/03/12/speeding-up-k-means-clustering-algebra-sparse-vectors/
-Grant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved MAHOUT-110.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed
> Ant script for building Taste web app
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reopened MAHOUT-99:
---
Hi Pallavi,
I'm getting:
09/03/18 11:13:56 WARN mapred.LocalJobRunner: job_local_0001
java.lang.
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Mar 17, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Enis Soztutar wrote:
-Grant
Knowing nothing about the mahout build script(s), I think that having
both ant and maven scripts might prove to be problematic. However
keeping one module(taste) in ant will work. As a side note, we have
discuss
Hey Jeff,
Is it appropriate to have a Job example like we do for k-means and
some of the other clustering algorithms for dirichlet? I see you do
have some type of UI in there, right?Are there directions
somewhere for running the example? http://cwiki.apache.org/MAHOUT/dirichlet-process
Interesting optimization. We can incorporate it by adding a centroid^2
argument to DistanceMeasure interface and adjusting the affected
clustering algorithms. All would benefit from this optimization. I will
build a test to assess its impact and report.
Jeff
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
http://ling
Did you reopen this issue because of this error? I just ran the example
and it ran without error.
Jeff
Grant Ingersoll (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reopened MAHOUT-99:
Not only appropriate but essential. I will add a README file in the code
and instructions in the wiki today.
Jeff
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Hey Jeff,
Is it appropriate to have a Job example like we do for k-means and
some of the other clustering algorithms for dirichlet? I see you do
have so
Yeah, I was wondering about that simple, but nice cluster-showing UI...
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 12:01:28 PM
> Subject: Dirchlet J
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683077#action_12683077
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on MAHOUT-99:
---
Yeah, what version of Hadoop are you running?
I'm running the example in Eclipse using the stand-alone mode in the
hadoop-0.19.1 jar file. It works fine, as does the hadoop compile in
Eclipse. I cannot; however, get any hadoop stuff to work from the
command line. Even though my JAVA_HOME environment is set to
/Library/Java/Home and java -v
Hi,
Am I the only person getting the following after mvn package?
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Failed to create assembly: Error creating a
Where are you running it? The top?
On Mar 18, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hi,
Am I the only person getting the following after mvn package?
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
-
On my Mac, I have:
$ echo $JAVA_HOME
/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.6/Home
-Grant
On Mar 18, 2009, at 2:10 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
I'm running the example in Eclipse using the stand-alone mode in the
hadoop-0.19.1 jar file. It works fine, as does the hadoop compile in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683140#action_12683140
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on MAHOUT-99:
---
I seem to recall hitting something similar be
Yes, at the top. Bad?
Doing it from core worked.
How come it doesn't work from root and should it, at least for 0.2? WOuld be
more intuitive, no?
Otis
- Original Message
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 2:19:29 PM
> Subje
Hi,
Is there a way to get a collection of neighbours for a given user? I'm
referring to the same neighbour collection that recommendations are derived
from. I didn't see a way, so I simply made NearestNUserNeighborhood.Estimator
public (diff below), so I could do something like this:
publ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683170#action_12683170
]
Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-103:
--
1. How do you feel about, therefore, changing to use m
How about the method UserBasedRecommender.mostSimilarUsers()? or a bit
more directly, UserNeighborhood.getUserNeighborhood()? (They are
arguably kind of redundant but it's 'for historical reasons' and low
on my list of design sins.) These in turn largely use
TopItems.getTopUsers() and you apparentl
[WARNING] Entry:
mahout-0.2-SNAPSHOT/Users/jeff/Documents/workspace/Mahout/target/mahout-0.1-SNAPSHOT-project.tar.bz2
longer than 100 characters.
No movement in the system transcript for many, many minutes.
Jeff
PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature
Took me ~15 minutes the first time, 5 minutes subsequent times. Yeah
it still seems long, and does seem like something is amiss, but if it
works it seems OK for now.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Jeff Eastman
wrote:
> [WARNING] Entry:
> mahout-0.2-SNAPSHOT/Users/jeff/Documents/workspace/Mahout
Same experience here. But it finished eventually.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Jeff Eastman
> To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5:52:32 PM
> Subject: Packaging step taking forever... is
Mine's been running in that one step for over an hour.
Sean Owen wrote:
Took me ~15 minutes the first time, 5 minutes subsequent times. Yeah
it still seems long, and does seem like something is amiss, but if it
works it seems OK for now.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Jeff Eastman
wrote:
On Mar 18, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Yes, at the top. Bad?
It works for me. Try doing a clean.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683232#action_12683232
]
Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-103:
> 1. How do you feel about, therefore, changing t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683238#action_12683238
]
Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-103:
--
The comparison would be to Item. You could say that's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683251#action_12683251
]
Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-103:
--
The comparison would be to Item. You could say that's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683252#action_12683252
]
Richard Tomsett commented on MAHOUT-99:
---
Yup, just downloaded the latest trunk and run
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-59?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683254#action_12683254
]
Richard Tomsett commented on MAHOUT-59:
---
Ugh, I had an example almost done but managed
That worked for me, but it still took forever.
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Mar 18, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Yes, at the top. Bad?
It works for me. Try doing a clean.
PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683297#action_12683297
]
Pallavi Palleti commented on MAHOUT-99:
---
Yup. That must be the issue. But I am wonderi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683312#action_12683312
]
Pallavi Palleti commented on MAHOUT-99:
---
I have used KeyValueLineRecordReader internal
The Synthetic Control kMeans job calls the Canopy job to build its
initial clusters as is commonly done. If the kMeans record format was
changed and the Canopy not changed accordingly, then everything would
still compile but there would be a mismatch when the kMeans mapper tried
to read in the
Are the examples run automatically in the build?
Pallavi Palleti (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683297#action_12683297 ]
Pallavi Palleti commented on MAHOUT-99:
---
Yeah. But, I am wondering how the testcases succeeded? I ran them using "mvn
clean install" command.
Thanks
Pallavi
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Eastman [mailto:j...@windwardsolutions.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 9:56 AM
To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Comme
Sure, why don't you go ahead and post a patch?
Pallavi Palleti (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683312#action_12683312 ]
Pallavi Palleti commented on MAHOUT-99:
The unit tests dont care which format is used as long as it is
consistent. The compiler helps enforce that. kMeans will run and its
tests will pass. So will Canopy. When somebody runs the kMeans example
it encounters the file format differences. Are all the examples run by
the install? I'd be s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683320#action_12683320
]
Ankur commented on MAHOUT-103:
--
Alright! then I'll incorporate 1 and 2 as suggested by Sean an
Also why not consider just converting canopy? Which reader is better?
Jeff Eastman wrote:
* PGP Signed: 03/18/09 at 21:37:36
Sure, why don't you go ahead and post a patch?
Pallavi Palleti (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.syst
There is a testcase in TestKMeansClustering.java which actually uses the output
of Canopy as input. This testcase succeeded without any issue. But the thing
here is, it doesn't use hdfs but uses the local file system. So, this might be
the reason why it is succeeded without any issue.
Thanks
Pa
It depends on the kind of output. If we are just outputting only some numeric
values then it is preferred to have SequenceFile as the data is written as
binary. If not, it is preferred to write as simple text. Text file is readable
where as binary is not readable.
As we consider the data as te
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683335#action_12683335
]
Pallavi Palleti commented on MAHOUT-99:
---
If we need to modify Canopy. We need to modif
Ankur,
What form will the counts be in when you need this function?
Four integers separately available?
Values in a view of a matrix?
I will be happy to adapt some code to compute the measure you need.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Ankur (JIRA) wrote:
> map-red implementation of the log-l
54 matches
Mail list logo
