Re: [MlMt] Impossible to set up multiple IMAP accounts pointing to the same IMAP server

2015-11-17 Thread Alberto Caporro
thing like this before? Alberto On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Alberto Caporro wrote: > Hi Benny, > > thanks for your usual ultra-fast reply; I'm going to try as soon as the > backup ends, I'll keep you updated of the outcome. > > Best regards, > Alberto > >

Re: [MlMt] Impossible to set up multiple IMAP accounts pointing to the same IMAP server

2015-11-10 Thread Alberto Caporro
Hi Benny, thanks for your usual ultra-fast reply; I'm going to try as soon as the backup ends, I'll keep you updated of the outcome. Best regards, Alberto On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: > On 10 Nov 2015, at 15:24, Alberto Caporro wrote: > > a

[MlMt] Impossible to set up multiple IMAP accounts pointing to the same IMAP server

2015-11-10 Thread Alberto Caporro
Hi MailMaters, after experiencing a total loss of our email server, I'm trying to add to MailMate a new account pointing to the new server; connection parameters are the same. I've left hanging around the old account (in offline state), so that I can later copy back all my emails to the new accoun

Re: [MlMt] Automatically stored attachments

2014-05-29 Thread Alberto Caporro
+1 My feeling is that attachments should be removed as soon as they are not used anymore. Maybe a configurable option.? Best regards, Alberto On May 29, 2014 5:09 PM, "Luca Allodi" wrote: > Hi All, Benny, > > All the attachments "quicklook'd" in MailMate are stored in > ~/Library/Application

Re: [MlMt] tape a

2014-02-08 Thread Alberto Caporro
I've also noticed this, but I never linked it to the 'a' letter; now that I've been told, I'm quite sure that it happens (not always, I would say, but rather often) only with address starting with it. I'm also reasonably sure that it hasn't always been like this; at some point in time it just star

Re: [MlMt] Set From: field depending on recipient address

2013-10-23 Thread Alberto Caporro
I've taken some time to think about this, and I'm still not sure of what the best solution could be (for my use case, at least), but I like the configurability of 5 too. On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: > On 14 Oct 2013, at 9:33, Alberto Caporro

Re: [MlMt] Mailbox stops updating

2013-10-21 Thread Alberto Caporro
Just as a side note, I also noticed a similar behaviour, but it was definitely there BEFORE 1.7; I always thought it had something to do with slow or unstable network connection in one of the places I work at, but I've never been able to reach a firm conclusion. It's not so frequent, so I never ca

Re: [MlMt] Set From: field depending on recipient address

2013-10-14 Thread Alberto Caporro
So, please, consider a more general From-derivation a feature request :-) Regards, Alberto On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: > On 9 Oct 2013, at 20:06, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: > > On 9 Oct 2013, at 20:01, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: > > You also reported a problem in th

Re: [MlMt] Set From: field depending on recipient address

2013-10-09 Thread Alberto Caporro
Hi Benny, if I remember correctly, the From address auto-selection used to work only if sent email were kept in the "Sent" folder; I'm not sure if you made any change to that, but in my experience (I keep sent emails in the relevant folders, not in Sent) it is still not working. There are recipie

Re: [MlMt] Strange error message

2013-10-07 Thread Alberto Caporro
I can confirm that it seems to be fixed; I'll keep you informed if some other strangeness appears. Thanks, Alberto On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: > On 7 Oct 2013, at 16:39, Steve Mayer wrote: > > I actually saw an instance of this error with a test build from before

Re: [MlMt] Strange error message

2013-10-07 Thread Alberto Caporro
erto On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: > On 7 Oct 2013, at 11:03, Alberto Caporro wrote: > > I've been recently getting the following error message: >> >> MailMate encountered the following error: “Server response: “I10 BAD Error >>

[MlMt] Strange error message

2013-10-07 Thread Alberto Caporro
Hi list, I've been recently getting the following error message: MailMate encountered the following error: “Server response: “I10 BAD Error in IMAP command APPEND: 8bit data in atom”.”. Mailbox: “Liste/Bacula”. The corresponding mailboxes ends up in the "Failed" state and seems to be unusable.

Re: [MlMt] Refactored mailbox editor

2013-05-24 Thread Alberto Caporro
Hi Benny, I went to r3420, experienced some issue and then went back to r3384, but something must have gone wrong, since my left pane now looks as in the attached screenshot. If you don't need additional info I'm going to reset MM configuration and start from scratch. Cheers, Alberto On Thu, M

Re: [MlMt] layout bug

2013-04-29 Thread Alberto Caporro
Hi Eric, I don't think it has anything to do with Steve's view, since I'm also experiencing it with the default Widescreen layout. I also failed to identify a repeatable way to reproduce the issue, so I can only join you in this vague statement ;-) Cheers, Alberto On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:11

Re: [MlMt] mailmate randomly changes the sender address

2013-04-15 Thread Alberto Caporro
gt; stabilise. >>> >>> That said, to emphasise, if you change the sending ID in the composer >>> *after* you have put in your first destination address, MailMate will >>> behave just like Mail and other email apps. It will not change the >>

Re: [MlMt] mailmate randomly changes the sender address

2013-04-15 Thread Alberto Caporro
ithout asking. >> >> I actually don't see how this could be useful. >> I want to be the only one to choose what address a mail should be sent >> from. >> >> Even if some day I decide to use the "personal" address to write to a >> person who &g

Re: [MlMt] mailmate randomly changes the sender address

2013-04-13 Thread Alberto Caporro
Hi Tom, in my experience MM change the "From" address when you add a recipient; depending on your previous usage pattern it decides which address to use. I've still not been able to get a reasonable behaviour for this function; no matter whatever I've tried, wrong address still are selected for o