A few last notes on Virgil MSS. in the
At 11:35 AM 8/23/2002 -0400, I wrote:
>For modern editions, the most important codices are (according to E.
>Courtney) as follows: Mediceus (Laurentian Lib. 39.1 and Vatican lat. 3225
>fol. 76), Romanus (Vatican lat. 3867), and Palatinus (Vatican, Pal. lat.
PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
Wilson-Okamura
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VIRGIL: Early Vergil printings and another request
At 11:35 AM 8/23/2002 -0400, I wrote:
>... the situation is hopeless for anything beyond the
>Carolingian period -- until c. 1470
This sounds exactly what we need here!
Thanks
Helen COB
On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 12:02 AM, David Wilson-Okamura wrote:
At 11:35 AM 8/23/2002 -0400, I wrote:
... the situation is hopeless for anything beyond the
Carolingian period -- until c. 1470, when Virgil gets into print.
Looks like I
At 11:35 AM 8/23/2002 -0400, I wrote:
>... the situation is hopeless for anything beyond the
>Carolingian period -- until c. 1470, when Virgil gets into print.
Looks like I spoke too soon. I've spent a couple of very happy days with
Venier, and among the many topics he deals with in _Per una stori
Than you all very much for all the information, bibliography, and good
advice.
Helen COB
On Friday, August 23, 2002, at 03:35 PM, David Wilson-Okamura wrote:
At 09:58 AM 8/23/2002 +0100, James Butrica wrote:
Some partial suggestions have been made for secondary sources on early
editions, but for
PE scripsit:
>I would like for some one on the list to give some advice about how to train
>ap students to gain not a 4 but get a 5 on the vergil ap exam. I would like
>it in lesson plans, tests, and quizzes.
Why, what a wonderful segue to send out a general "heads up" about
the AP-LATIN list, spo
ect: Re: VIRGIL: Early Vergil printings and another request
>Date: Fri, Aug 23, 2002, 3:35 PM
>
> At 09:58 AM 8/23/2002 +0100, James Butrica wrote:
>>Some partial suggestions have been made for secondary sources on early
>>editions, but for a complete inventory of incunabul
At 09:58 AM 8/23/2002 +0100, James Butrica wrote:
>Some partial suggestions have been made for secondary sources on early
>editions, but for a complete inventory of incunabula I suspect that you
>would have to create your own from Hain and the other reference works
>devoted to listing them (and eve
>Could someone suggest to an unreconstructed early medievalist a good
>discussion of incunabula Vergils?
>Might I also ask for suggestions on what passages the group would
>suggest for collation in a text of the Aeneid to establish possible
>affinities.
>Helen COB
>
Some partial suggestions have b
dear Helen
thank u!
i love u!
V.
From: "Helen Conrad-O'Briain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VIRGIL: Early Vergil printings and another request
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 08:38:44 +
Dear Leofranc,
I knew you woul
Dear Leofranc,
I knew you would come through!
Helen
---
To leave the Mantovano mailing list at any time, do NOT hit reply.
Instead, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message
"unsubscribe mantovano" in the body (omitting the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Helen Conrad-
O'Briain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>Could someone suggest to an unreconstructed early medievalist a good
>discussion of incunabula Vergils?
Matteo Venier, _Per uns storia del testo di Virgilio nella prima età del
libro a stampa (1469-1419) (Udine:
Could someone suggest to an unreconstructed early medievalist a good
discussion of incunabula Vergils?
Might I also ask for suggestions on what passages the group would
suggest for collation in a text of the Aeneid to establish possible
affinities.
Helen COB
13 matches
Mail list logo
