Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote on 2008/02/04 13:44:
* Thomas Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-04 14:10]:
When this came up on the list before I think there was a
consensus that `text/x-markdown` is usable -- possibly with a
URI to identify the Markdown syntax used.
Did I understand that cor
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 23:41 -0800, david parsons wrote:
> I'm fairly late to the game (and I wrote a C markdown before I
> started reading this list, so I'm not exactly in the mainstream) but
> the syntax described on humanized seems incredibly noisy. Wouldn't
> the editorial corr
* Thomas Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-04 14:10]:
> When this came up on the list before I think there was a
> consensus that `text/x-markdown` is usable -- possibly with a
> URI to identify the Markdown syntax used.
>
> Did I understand that correctly?
Yes, you did. Using a type with a sub
Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote on 2008/02/03 19:46:
* Petite Abeille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-03 17:55]:
What MIME type do people use for Markdown?
Regrettably, there still isn’t one registered for Markdown. If my
reading of [RFC 4288] is correct, John shouldn’t have any trouble
