All I know is what I've read or heard from reliable sources. To give
you some idea of what goes on in PR management, a newsletter said that
the police had to be called to maintain order at a meeting of board
members and residents, and that future meetings would request police
presence; or
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Richard Hattaway
rhatta...@rocketmail.comwrote:
There were 2,355 households out of which . 22.0% were
non-families. 18.4% of all households were made up of individuals
I'm suprised the 'non families' are not up in arms against the wiki boys
(c:
Well,
Well, they're vastly outnumbered by the people who are not individuals.
Best,
-Tim
ROFLMAO... ( ps, is that ok, PC wise ?? )
On Friday, March 28, 2014 2:10 PM, Tim Crone bb...@crone.us wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Richard Hattaway
rhatta...@rocketmail.comwrote:
There
Interesting! I'll send a copy to the subdivision president.
ThanksGerry
On 3/26/2014 2:50 PM, Richard Hattaway wrote:
Not a real problem to have a controlled burn in an area like that. We had one
last year. I was super impressed. The NC Forestry Service pulled it off, had
a whole
On 3/26/2014 1:01 PM, Dieselhead wrote:
___
I wish we could do controlled burns, but I don't think you could do
it in a large wooded subdivision of mostly one to five acre lots and
a lot of standing dead trees on lots that don't have houses. I
would guess that not more than
Gerry,
If the property is in Florida and there is an HOA in place under Florida law
they can potentially fine, or if there is no provision for fines in the bylaws,
pay to have the work done then either file a lien or a foreclosure action
against the owner.
This takes no votes on the part of
This is sort of a unique subdivision which has two ruling bodies; one
of which was formed in rebellion against the other. The owner of the
subdivision (which is probably most of the vacant lots) is Prudential
Insurance company. I get newsletters from two. This subdivision is so
large, the
I thought you said it had an HOA? If so, there is only one board regardless of
who owns what.
Dan
On Mar 27, 2014, at 8:21 PM, arche...@embarqmail.com wrote:
This is sort of a unique subdivision which has two ruling bodies; one of
which was formed in rebellion against the other. The
Wow that's a big place.. and only two entrances. I bet the traffic at shift
change can be challenging. However, I think I saw in the wiki article that the
median age is in the 60's ..
70% of the people were over 45. So maybe not so crowded at the gate (c:
There were 2,355 households out
The local restrictions here are probably necessary because of
constant dry conditions and the subdivision being heavily forested
with houses built among the trees. The underbrush is like tinder.
Gerry
Y'all need to do controlled burns to eliminate the fuel and eliminate
some of the
On 3/26/2014 10:09 AM, Dieselhead wrote:
The local restrictions here are probably necessary because of
constant dry conditions and the subdivision being heavily forested
with houses built among the trees. The underbrush is like tinder.
Gerry
Y'all need to do controlled burns to eliminate
You have native gooseberries?? WTF.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:00 PM, arche...@embarqmail.com
arche...@embarqmail.com wrote:
On 3/26/2014 10:09 AM, Dieselhead wrote:
The local restrictions here are probably necessary because of constant
dry conditions and the subdivision being heavily
___
I wish we could do controlled burns, but I don't think you could do
it in a large wooded subdivision of mostly one to five acre lots
and a lot of standing dead trees on lots that don't have houses. I
would guess that not more than one fourth of the lots have houses,
and
Not a real problem to have a controlled burn in an area like that. We had one
last year. I was super impressed. The NC Forestry Service pulled it off, had
a whole bunch of guys in yellow suits and stuff, and trucks everywhere, and one
big yellow helicopter. The helicopter shot fire balls,
14 matches
Mail list logo
