On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Keith Whitwell kei...@vmware.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 03:43 -0700, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 15:20 -0700, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Keith
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Keith Whitwell
keith.whitw...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Keith Whitwell kei...@vmware.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 03:43 -0700, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Thu,
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Keith Whitwell
keith.whitw...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Keith Whitwell
keith.whitw...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Keith Whitwell
Hmm, not sure whether to merge or squash-merge this branch. Any thoughts?
Keith
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune
On 10.04.2010 14:00, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Hmm, not sure whether to merge or squash-merge this branch. Any thoughts?
I'm no big fan of squash merge but the history of the normal merge won't
be nice neither. Tough call, though I'd prefer a normal merge.
Roland
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Keith Whitwell
keith.whitw...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hmm, not sure whether to merge or squash-merge this branch. Any thoughts?
The conversion to pipe_resource seems to be done by components. Maybe a new
branch that reorganize (git rebase -i) the commits in
On 10.04.2010 16:43, Chia-I Wu wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Keith Whitwell
keith.whitw...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hmm, not sure whether to merge or squash-merge this branch. Any thoughts?
The conversion to pipe_resource seems to be done by components. Maybe a new
branch that
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com wrote:
On 10.04.2010 16:43, Chia-I Wu wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Keith Whitwell
keith.whitw...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hmm, not sure whether to merge or squash-merge this branch. Any thoughts?
The conversion to
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Keith Whitwell
keith.whitw...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com
wrote:
On 10.04.2010 16:43, Chia-I Wu wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Keith Whitwell
keith.whitw...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hmm,
On 10.04.2010 17:10, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Keith Whitwell
keith.whitw...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com
wrote:
On 10.04.2010 16:43, Chia-I Wu wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Keith Whitwell
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com wrote:
On 10.04.2010 17:10, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Keith Whitwell
keith.whitw...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com
wrote:
On
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 15:20 -0700, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Keith Whitwell kei...@vmware.com
wrote:
OK, it seems like quite a few cases had migrated to the new
buffer_map_range() behaviour. I've looked at all I can find
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 03:43 -0700, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 15:20 -0700, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Keith Whitwell kei...@vmware.com
wrote:
OK, it seems like quite a few cases had migrated to the new
Hi all,
I've git branched and got the latest commits from the
gallium-resources branch and also the latest commits from git master.
I did a gmake -B realclean from a prevous compile on my copy of git
master,and did a git checkout gallium-resources to switch to that
branch,and did a
On 09.04.2010 17:29, STEVE555 wrote:
Hi all,
I've git branched and got the latest commits from the
gallium-resources branch and also the latest commits from git master.
I did a gmake -B realclean from a prevous compile on my copy of git
master,and did a git checkout
Dear Roland,
I like to thank you very much for the fixes.I have
compiled from commit 927cec79cedb457efa9e6f335727cfcb8e4908e2 on the
gallium-resources branch and that compiles fine now.
I also did a git merge of my copy of mesa master (from commit
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com wrote:
On 09.04.2010 17:29, STEVE555 wrote:
Hi all,
I've git branched and got the latest commits from the
gallium-resources branch and also the latest commits from git master.
I did a gmake -B realclean from a
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 18:58 -0700, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Keith Whitwell kei...@vmware.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 03:28 -0700, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 23:23 -0700, Marek Olšák wrote:
There's something
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Keith Whitwell kei...@vmware.com wrote:
OK, it seems like quite a few cases had migrated to the new
buffer_map_range() behaviour. I've looked at all I can find and moved
them back to the old behaviour.
glean is passing now on softpipe.
There's now an
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 03:28 -0700, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 23:23 -0700, Marek Olšák wrote:
There's something fishy in u_upload_mgr, could you please review the
first two patches here?
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~mareko/mesa/log/?h=gallium-resources
With this, r300g
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Keith Whitwell kei...@vmware.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 03:28 -0700, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 23:23 -0700, Marek Olšák wrote:
There's something fishy in u_upload_mgr, could you please review the
first two patches here?
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 23:23 -0700, Marek Olšák wrote:
There's something fishy in u_upload_mgr, could you please review the
first two patches here?
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~mareko/mesa/log/?h=gallium-resources
With this, r300g works again.
Hmm, I think the second of the patches (flush
There's something fishy in u_upload_mgr, could you please review the first
two patches here?
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~mareko/mesa/log/?h=gallium-resources
With this, r300g works again.
-Marek
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.comwrote:
I'm planning on
I'm planning on merging the gallium-resources branch shortly (after
easter). Due to the amount of code changed, it wouldn't be unexpected if
some drivers break here and there. So it would be nice if the respective
driver authors could take a look at that branch now.
If you've missed the
How about merging gallium-buffer-usage-cleanup as well, which is based
on gallium-resources?
Unless, it changed recently, the gallium-resources branch left a mix
of old PIPE_BUFFER_USAGE_* and new PIPE_TRANSFER_* flags.
It would nice to convert drivers having both branches, so that it is done
25 matches
Mail list logo
