On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:50:11 -0500 J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 6/10/11 9:27 PM, Tariel Gogoberidze wrote:
Dave Cragg was maintaining documentation
athttp://www.lacscentre.com/liburl/releases.html but the latest
release notes are about vs 1.1.6 and I can't find any LibURL vs 1.2
release
On 6/10/11 9:27 PM, Tariel Gogoberidze wrote:
Dave Cragg was maintaining documentation
athttp://www.lacscentre.com/liburl/releases.html but the latest
release notes are about vs 1.1.6 and I can't find any LibURL vs 1.2
release notes in LiveCode IDE as well.
RR took over maintenance a couple
Hi,
Current MC IDE has LibURL vs 1.1.6 and latest LiveCode has LibURL vs 1.2.0.
I moved LibURL vs 1.2.0 to my MC IDE but I can't find any info on what changed
between 1.1.6 and 1.2.0
Dave Cragg was maintaining documentation at
http://www.lacscentre.com/liburl/releases.html but the latest
protocol
instead of ftp (which is what I believe LibUrl is using).
Can anybody shed some light on this for me?
Thanks,
Ray Horsley
Developer, LinkIt! Software
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo
or not. I've also been asked if it could use http protocol
instead of ftp (which is what I believe LibUrl is using).
Ray, the protocol that libUrl uses depends on the url you supply.
(i.e. does the url start with http://; or ftp://;?)
You can use get url with either http or ftp. put
Hi all
A libUrl update (version 1.1.2) is available. You can get it here.
http://www.lacscentre.co.uk/liburl/releases.html
or do this in the message box
go url http://www.lacscentre.co.uk/liburl/updaters/liburl_1_1_2.rev;
No new features over 1.1.1. Just a couple of bug fixes.
Cheers
Dave
Until the RunRev site has the libUrl documentation back up again,
you can view it here:
http://www.lacscentre.co.uk/liburl/
Excellent -- thank you!
indeed
But as always, I'm open to opinions.
It won't affect Rev folks, and it seems few MC users use the same
copy of mctools.mc across multiple
Hi
Until the RunRev site has the libUrl documentation back up again, you
can view it here:
http://www.lacscentre.co.uk/liburl/
You can also get an updater for the latest version (1.1.1 or 1.0.16)
there as well. (Note that the previously announced betas of these
versions introduced a bug
On Oct 26, 2004, at 1:53 PM, Dave Cragg wrote:
Until the RunRev site has the libUrl documentation back up again, you
can view it here:
http://www.lacscentre.co.uk/liburl/
Dave,
Thank you very much for all of your work. Many of the projects I work
on take advantage of this wonderful library
Recently, Mark Talluto wrote:
Thank you very much for all of your work. Many of the projects I work
on take advantage of this wonderful library.
Seconded, thirded, fourthed, and fifthed.
Thanks very much Dave. As always, your help and contributions are very much
appreciated.
Regards,
Dave Cragg wrote:
Hi
Until the RunRev site has the libUrl documentation back up again, you
can view it here:
http://www.lacscentre.co.uk/liburl/
Excellent -- thank you!
You can also get an updater for the latest version (1.1.1 or 1.0.16)
there as well. (Note that the previously announced betas
are
very much
appreciated.
Rev/MC could'nt be the n-tier apps development platform of choice
they are without embedding LibURL !!! So thanks again and again, Andu.
So many thanks for going head with that all, Dave.
Best Regards, Pierre
--
Bien cordialement, Pierre Sahores
100, rue de Paris
F
I have a WebMerge customer whose reporting that he's getting an error
10053 when he tries to FTP. WebMerge uses libURL v1.0.13.
I can't reproduce the error here, and the user claims that the same
settings as he's using in WebMerge work well when FTPing from the
command line (he's using WinXP
On 20 Oct 2004, at 22:21, Richard Gaskin wrote:
I have a WebMerge customer whose reporting that he's getting an error
10053 when he tries to FTP. WebMerge uses libURL v1.0.13.
I can't reproduce the error here, and the user claims that the same
settings as he's using in WebMerge work well when
I'm using MC 2.4.3 and Mac OSX
The following doesn't work:
on mouseUp
start using libURL
put url http://www.cariboo.bc.ca; into temp
go temp
end mouseUp
How do I know if the libURL is present?
If it's not present how do I load it?
How do I make
Anyone have a URL to the latest version of LibURL which is compatible
with the latest engine?
I can reconstruct one from dissecting Rev, but I'd rather use the one
from the official download URL. That is, if there is an official
download URL. :)
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media
Anyone have a URL to the latest version of LibURL which is
compatible with the latest engine?
I can reconstruct one from dissecting Rev, but I'd rather use the
one from the official download URL. That is, if there is an
official download URL. :)
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media
Robert Brenstein wrote:
Anyone have a URL to the latest version of LibURL which is compatible
with the latest engine?
I can reconstruct one from dissecting Rev, but I'd rather use the one
from the official download URL. That is, if there is an official
download URL. :)
Wasn't the url
Thank you for the summary and the URLs.
Dave Cragg wrote:
BTW, have you had any more thoughts on how to handle the split
versions of libUrl we now have for the MC IDE?
Yeah: have one version that's also backwardly compatible. :)
But seriously, I've been giving it some thought and while it's
I'd propose that we do with libURL what we did with the Standalone
Builder: have two versions included in the IDE, and use the version
appropriate to the engine being used in that session.
Can anyone think of a downside to that?
For the sake of simplicity I like being able to use one IDE build
On 8 Sep 2004, at 03:17, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Some time ago Dave Cragg wrote:
The version of libUrl (1.1a3) currently being distributed with
the Rev 2.5 beta (engine 2.6.1) is not backwards compatible with
earlier engines. This is because of syntax added to support
secure sockets in https
Dave,
Let me know if you need a place to host libURL. I've got plenty of
server space.
-Chipp
Dave Cragg wrote:
On 8 Sep 2004, at 03:17, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Some time ago Dave Cragg wrote:
The version of libUrl (1.1a3) currently being distributed with
the Rev 2.5 beta (engine 2.6.1
Dave wrote:
By the way, I just noticed that the libUrl pages on the new Rev
website are incomplete (no links to documentation or downloads). I'll
check with RunRev what they plan for this. However, it may be a good
idea to have the latest updaters posted elsewhere. On the Yahoo site
perhaps
Where can I download the latest version of libURL for use in MC?
Can I use earlier versions of libURL with the Rev 2.5 engine?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com
Some time ago Dave Cragg wrote:
The version of libUrl (1.1a3) currently being distributed with
the Rev 2.5 beta (engine 2.6.1) is not backwards compatible with
earlier engines. This is because of syntax added to support
secure sockets in https URLs.
Can older versions of libURL be used
Hi Richard,
I believe you *can* use earlier versions of libURL, though they won't
support the SSL features. Contact me offlist if you need the latest beta
sans SSL.
best,
Chipp
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Where can I download the latest version of libURL for use in MC?
Can I use earlier versions
line or two to the IDE to
specifically check for a matching version of libURL? The user could of
course ignore the warning, but at least they'd be likely to understand
why their URL scripts were failing after receiving said warning...
It may not be so straightforward. In the case of a new
, and maybe add an extra line or two to the IDE to
specifically check for a matching version of libURL? The user could of
course ignore the warning, but at least they'd be likely to understand
why their URL scripts were failing after receiving said warning...
It may not be so straightforward
Ah, right. Yes that would cause extra difficulty.
With that said, should the IDE generally be doing something along the
lines of:
try
start using stack libURL
catch tErr
answer error Error loading libURL... version conflict?
end try
And would that relieve some of the problems with any
of the engine. Could we use
this same sort of logic, and maybe add an extra line or two to the
IDE to specifically check for a matching version of libURL? The user
could of course ignore the warning, but at least they'd be likely to
understand why their URL scripts were failing after receiving said
it looked like the whole IDE
might fall prey to creeping eye candy (that modernistic splash screen
for example, and older users probably think things started going south
when the image icon changed some years back, was that you Rossi?
grin).
Anyway, to more serious things...
The version of libUrl
to
specifically check for a matching version of libURL? The user could of
course ignore the warning, but at least they'd be likely to understand
why their URL scripts were failing after receiving said warning...
The warning comes from the Home stack and not the IDE. The Home stack
has never been
Hi All
A beta of the latest version of libUrl is available at the following url:
http://www.runrev.com/revolution/developers/interimreleases/liburl/releases.shtml
In addition to some bug fixes, it has a number of new features:
It provides support for emulating htmls forms of types
application
At 9:30 pm -0500 22/12/02, John Kiltinen wrote:
snip
The problem is that in the conversion to the new version of MetaCard, as I
understand it, is that the handling of Internet functionality has been
taken over by the libURL system. In order to incorporate this funcionality
into my program, I
My question has to do with using Resource Mover to delete resources and
then using it to add them back to a stack. This is happening in the
context of migrating to a newer version of MetaCard and converting from Mac
classic to OS X. In particular, my question relates to bringing in LibURL.
Here
Hi
Two new updates to libUrl are available at the url below:
http://www.runrev.com/revolution/developers/interimreleases/liburl/releases.shtml
Please note that Starter Kit users won't be able to apply these
updates. (This is not a marketing ploy; it's just because the script
limits make
At 10:31 pm -0700 1/7/02, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Dave Cragg: thank you for putting in the time for the error-checking in
libURL, and the handy MakeDir feature that makes uploading to
as-yet-non-existent directories a snap.
I love the plaudits, Richard, but it would be wrong to leave
--On Tuesday, July 2, 2002 8:11 AM +0100 Dave Cragg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:31 pm -0700 1/7/02, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Dave Cragg: thank you for putting in the time for the error-checking in
libURL, and the handy MakeDir feature that makes uploading to
as-yet-non-existent
I'm trying to get .RDF files using libURL w/ no luck.
For example - I can view http://www.macnn.com/macnn.rdf from my browser,
but the following script does not work:
on mouseUp
put http://www.macnn.com/macnn.rdf; into aURL
get URL aURL
put it into fld R
end mouseUp
I believe it's
At 9:52 am -0400 2/7/02, thinkertoys wrote:
I'm trying to get .RDF files using libURL w/ no luck.
For example - I can view http://www.macnn.com/macnn.rdf from my browser,
but the following script does not work:
on mouseUp
put http://www.macnn.com/macnn.rdf; into aURL
get URL aURL
put
It works here. Nothing special required.
Dave. Your confirmation that it works really helped.
I started looking elsewhere found that my problem was really stupid:
2 fields called R, one exactly on top of the other.
Thanks,
Eric
___
metacard mailing
On Tue, 02 Jul 2002 andu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Tuesday, July 2, 2002 8:11 AM +0100 Dave Cragg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:31 pm -0700 1/7/02, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Dave Cragg: thank you for putting in the time for the error-checking in
libURL, and the handy MakeDir
Hi
An updated version of the libUrl library is available at the following url:
http://www.runrev.com/revolution/developers/interimreleases/liburl/index.shtml
Note that this is the same version that is included with the 2.4.3b1
Metacard release, so there's no need to update if you're running
Does the library support posting data with this format?
Would this work if I:
1) use a function to encode the data as multipart/form encoded,
2) set the httpheaders to include Content type: mulipart/form-data;
boundary= someboundary
3) post the encoded data using libUrl
3) post the encoded data using libUrl?
libUrl will support it. That is, it will include in the http request
any headers set in the httpheaders, and will try to post any data you
ask it to. Whether it will work will depend on what the server end is
expecting. Give it a try and see.
Note
, you wrote:
Not exactly a problem but YOUR web server (Roxen) is very particular
about crlf which is why it didn't recognize the request header from
libURL as valid HTTP. The problem has been fixed for the next release.
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard@lists.runrev.com/
Info: http
Mark Lacy wrote:
I have just started trying to learn to use the libUrl functions in Metacard
2.4. Searching the list I found this from Andu:
start using libURL
put url http://www.metacard.com/stacks/tools.mc; into temp
go temp
It worked fine.
Sivakatirswami kindly allowed me use
From: Sivakatirswami [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
3) How does one go about implementing progress bars and feedback from the
libURL handlers? Do we need to go in and add code ourselves? Seems like that
kind of tampering by a novice could be dangerous, ...so, does libURL send
messages that we can trap
Aloha,
I made an FTP widget for one of the editors that simply uploads an html
string to a specific directory/file.
Of course... (duh) when I gave it to him with the 2,4 engine and no home
stack, it failed...obviously...libURL absent..
This leads to several questions:
1) it seems when
Title: RE: exploring LibURL - among vs contains and arrays
Rodney,
Thanks for reminding me about is among; I had forgotten that, and had been using a variation of contains in my scripts.This:
if Hello is among the items of myGreetings
is a lot better than:
if (, myGreetings
Title: exploring LibURL - among vs contains and
arrays
Thanks Phil, Mark and Scott for the responses to my sockets
enquiry
Further to Scott's suggestion I've been looking through the
LibURL stack.
Consider amongs vs contains:
newUrl is among the lines of the keys of tQue
a is among the words
Aloha, Andu:
Does 2.4B4.1
include the updates your released in July?
Andu wrote:
=
I uploaded 2 stacks: update-lib.mc and liburl_update_1.mc at
ftp.archeopterix.com. Start up MC 2.4B4, open update-lib.mc and
just
click. You'll be prompted to find the second stack and
in MC 2.3.2 I can't intercept the content of the header.
But MC 2.4 allows that, with the help of libURL. Right ?
Anyway, I still don't understand everything relative to
the handlers in libURL, especially getFormat, which seems
to be able to do what I want.
Could anyone give me a hint on how exactly
in MC 2.3.2 I can't intercept the content of the header.
But MC 2.4 allows that, with the help of libURL. Right ?
LibURL allows you to edit it. Wht you need to edit is doProcess in libURL, not
getFormat.
Just add put lineOffset(Set-Cookie:,thHeader[tUrl[nX[x]]])... and deal with the
data later
Will the docs for the libURL be included in the next release of MC Beta?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
Multimedia Design and Development for Mac, Windows, UNIX, and the Web
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Could libURL be extended to allow users of it to customise the headers of
outgoing HTTP requests, and read the headers of incoming HTTP responses,
without losing the benefits of having the library (ie, without requiring
each developer to customise the library themselves).
A crude (but effective
Could libURL be extended to allow users of it to customise the headers of
outgoing HTTP requests, and read the headers of incoming HTTP responses,
without losing the benefits of having the library (ie, without requiring
each developer to customise the library themselves).
The easiest way
I'd like to get some experience with libURL; but I'm one of those newbie
types who's using Revolution. If I can work out where to download it from,
should it in principle be possible to use libURL from Revolution 1.0 (which
of course is based on the 2.3.2 MetaCard engine)? Are there any special
Several people noticed problems with libURL in 2.4B4 of which I'm aware
of and am working on fixing. Stand by.
Andu
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard@lists.runrev.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.
Ben Rubinstein wrote:
I'd like to get some experience with libURL; but I'm one of those newbie
types who's using Revolution. If I can work out where to download it from,
should it in principle be possible to use libURL from Revolution 1.0 (which
of course is based on the 2.3.2 MetaCard
I uploaded 2 stacks: update-lib.mc and liburl_update_1.mc at
ftp.archeopterix.com. Start up MC 2.4B4, open update-lib.mc and just
click. You'll be prompted to find the second stack and update the
library in your MetaCard Menu Bar.
Please keep testing and bug reporting.
Scott Rossi, see if it
Reed Martin wrote:
Okay,
Remember our pal LibURL, and how Andu told us all how to comment out the
line that was unnecessary since it would leave sockets open? Well I'm now
using the modified LibURL that came with 2.4B3, and having a problem...
Using the post command, it seems to cut
-- MESSAGE metacard.v004.n394.10 ---
From: Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: libURL
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:19:36 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm just now
; into HREF
put data= fld data into tData
start using stack libURL
post tData to url HREF
answer it
Problem = I'm not getting any data back in it; in fact, I'm not getting the
answer dialog at all.
I've tried removing the libURL line (I assume you need to use this with a
POST command
I set up a small test with 2.4A2
on mouseUp
start using libURL
put URL http://www.whatever.org; into fld catchHTML
end mouseUp
I didn't work. What did I do wrong?
To eliminate the possibility of connection problems
I turned right around
and tested, in 2.3.2 simply
on mouseUp
put URL
LiangTyan Fui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This maybe off topic a little:
Would it be better to start sharing of the libURL stack by default on 2.4?
This should offer a more transparent upgrade from 2.3 since URL support
available without the need to turn it on.
It does this automatically now
The Readme says :
Support for URL access other than file:, binfile, and resfile
have been moved out into a script library named libURL that you must
start using before you can access these types of URLs.
Where can I learn how to use the libURL what is libURL and hoe do we
have to use it ?
Can
Rolf Kocherhans wrote:
The Readme says :
Support for URL access other than file:, binfile, and resfile
have been moved out into a script library named libURL that you must
start using before you can access these types of URLs.
Where can I learn how to use the libURL what is libURL
Are there any problems posed when creating a standalone with the features
found in LibURL?
Jack Rarick
Braintree Athletic Systems
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard@lists.runrev.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED
This maybe off topic a little:
Would it be better to start sharing of the libURL stack by default on 2.4?
This should offer a more transparent upgrade from 2.3 since URL support
available without the need to turn it on.
Regards,
LiangTyan Fui
On 4/25/01 10:40 PM, andu wrote:
Rolf Kocherhans
70 matches
Mail list logo
