Re: [Mimedefang] helo callback

2014-11-18 Thread Dale Moore
> Check the Sendmail source. It seems to me that the version I checked > (8.14.5) lets the HELO go by successfully even if the milter says not to. Yep. 8.14.9 still has the bug that I see first referenced back in 2004. The routine in sendmail/srvrstmp.c where I suspect the bug resides is a smal

Re: [Mimedefang] helo callback

2014-11-07 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 11/7/2014 2:00 PM, David F. Skoll wrote: Check the Sendmail source. It seems to me that the version I checked (8.14.5) lets the HELO go by successfully even if the milter says not to. Accurate last time I checked. Which reminds me that I have a sendmail patch to discuss... ___

Re: [Mimedefang] helo callback

2014-11-07 Thread David F. Skoll
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 13:06:29 -0500 "Dale Moore" wrote: > Client: Helo naughtywords > Mimedefang filter_helo: return('REJECT', 'I do not like > naughtywords'); Server: 220 somehost.cs.cmu.edu Hello > someclient.cs.cmu.edu [128.2.x.x], pleased to meet you > Client: Mail From: > Mimedefang filter_se

[Mimedefang] helo callback

2014-11-07 Thread Dale Moore
Perhaps someone can explain this behavior.. Below is what happens in chronological order. Client: connect to server (sendmail 8.14.9) Mimedefang filter_relay: return('CONTINUE'); Server: 220 somehost.cs.cmu.edu ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.9/8.14.9; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 12:56 Client: Helo naughtywords Mimedef