> Check the Sendmail source. It seems to me that the version I checked
> (8.14.5) lets the HELO go by successfully even if the milter says not to.
Yep. 8.14.9 still has the bug that I see first referenced back in 2004.
The routine in sendmail/srvrstmp.c where I suspect the bug resides
is a smal
On 11/7/2014 2:00 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
Check the Sendmail source. It seems to me that the version I checked
(8.14.5) lets the HELO go by successfully even if the milter says not to.
Accurate last time I checked. Which reminds me that I have a sendmail
patch to discuss...
___
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 13:06:29 -0500
"Dale Moore" wrote:
> Client: Helo naughtywords
> Mimedefang filter_helo: return('REJECT', 'I do not like
> naughtywords'); Server: 220 somehost.cs.cmu.edu Hello
> someclient.cs.cmu.edu [128.2.x.x], pleased to meet you
> Client: Mail From:
> Mimedefang filter_se
Perhaps someone can explain this behavior..
Below is what happens in chronological order.
Client: connect to server (sendmail 8.14.9)
Mimedefang filter_relay: return('CONTINUE');
Server: 220 somehost.cs.cmu.edu ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.9/8.14.9; Fri, 7 Nov 2014
12:56
Client: Helo naughtywords
Mimedef
4 matches
Mail list logo