Not 100% sure from the logs but you've got a lot of mixer channels muted, maybe
PCM isn't getting amped. Also try 44100 Hz.
>I don't have windows available to update bios
You probably don't need Windows, just a boot CD like from PE Builder, Ultimate
Boot CD, etc. Intel and Dell also have some I
Hey,
could you try the following:
aucat -dd -frsnd/0 -i whatever.wav
and send me the output. If you don't have a .wav file, just use any
large bonary file (ex /bsd) it will produce noise.
If it hangs, while above process is still running, could you run:
audioctl; sleep 1; audioctl
and send me
Hi,
I've gotten an old computer and installed OpenBSD on it, to act as a media
player. The problem is I have no sound. First attempt was i386-current, 2nd
attempt was amd64-5.1.
There are 2 audio minijack outputs, one from the sound ports attached to
motherboard, the other is a plug leading to
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 20:40, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> This seems to come up most often regarding the math functions.
>
> Which Unix system doesn't require -lm for those math functions?
I think these people have no experience writing any C and OpenBSD is
the first place they've tried it. Trying t
Gamma espositori per negozi Fastandstore. Prodotto in Italia, dal design
innovativo. Aprofittane subito.
ALCUNI ESEMPI:
Serie TAPE
Serie TUBE
Dai un nuovo look al tuo negozio con le soluzioni espositive di fastandstore.
Arredare, ed esposrre da oggi C( semplice con le soluzioni in kit di
mon
This seems to come up most often regarding the math functions.
Which Unix system doesn't require -lm for those math functions?
> man intro (3) comes close in OpenBSD (I did man -k libraries to find it)
>
> It just seems like if a function requires a special library that
> should be mentioned in
man intro (3) comes close in OpenBSD (I did man -k libraries to find it)
It just seems like if a function requires a special library that
should be mentioned in the function's man page as well as the header
file since it needs both to work. I guess it depends on how surprised
you are that the fun
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 at 12:52:47 -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> It looks like ustuehler and jcs both wrote their own cvs-to-git
> importers for handling the OpenBSD src tree:
>
> https://github.com/ustuehler/git-cvs
> https://github.com/jcs/bigcvs2git
Both will convert HEAD properly, but neither
EUSecWest 2012, Amsterdam, September 19/20, Featuring Mobile PWN2OWN
CALL FOR PAPERS - Deadline June 15 2012
AMSTERDAM, Nederland -- The seventh annual EUSecWest
applied technical security conference - where the eminent
figures in the international security industry get
together share
Simon Perreault writes:
> On 2012-06-02 13:19, JC)rC)mie CourrC(ges-Anglas wrote:
^^ ^^ ^^
>> As you'll see in my signature above, 8 bit characters are mangled on
>> OpenBSD mailing lists. Not that I care much, but passing the demime perl
>> script a ''-8'' argument
291936
[IMAGE]
Campamento de Activacisn Profesional para Secretarias Ejecutivas,
Asistentes & Auxiliares
Hotel & Spa Posada Tlaltenango 6 y 7 Julio Cuernavaca, Morelos.
Un evento diferente, un espacio para renovar las ideas, reflexionar y
actuar con liderazgo.
2 dmas Especiales a un precio Incrembl
What's considered the current 'best practice' for following OpenBSD
src with git? I'm interested in trying out git for managing my
growing list of pending/WIP patches for the src tree, but there seem
to be a bunch of options and I don't know if there's any preference
between them.
It looks like u
> Theo de Raadt writes:
>
> > it is still false to say that greylisting wasn't permitted by the
> > original RFC's.
> >
> > it was, and it is.
>
> Any reasonable interpretation (IMO) of the relevant parts of RFC5321 and
> RFC2821 means that greylisting is well within the protocol specs. That
>
> I don't have a particular issue with most of the disk hackery that OpenBSD
> currently performs, but the key detail is that at least under x86, powermac
> and sgi platforms [1] it seems to work within the boundaries of the native
> disk partitioning by using a custom disk format, performing custo
On 4 June 2012 15:06, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Peter Kay wrote:
>
> > GPT is a foregone conclusion unless you are blind to the future. The only
> > alternative is OS specific disk hackery, and that does no-one any
> favours.
>
> Well, OpenBSD/i386 (and now /amd64) has used such hackery sinc
Theo de Raadt writes:
> it is still false to say that greylisting wasn't permitted by the
> original RFC's.
>
> it was, and it is.
Any reasonable interpretation (IMO) of the relevant parts of RFC5321 and
RFC2821 means that greylisting is well within the protocol specs. That
did however not stop
> > Not only is greylisting fine from a protocol point of view (as others
> > have pointed out), the IETF is also well aware of it. This is about to
> > become an RFC:
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting
>
> That's a marked improvement over what appeared to be the status
Simon Perreault writes:
> Not only is greylisting fine from a protocol point of view (as others
> have pointed out), the IETF is also well aware of it. This is about to
> become an RFC:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting
That's a marked improvement over what appeared to
On 2012-06-04 06:06, David Diggles wrote:
I was just thinking surely resending from a different IP breaks the RFC for
SMTP?
Then I did some googling, and found this.
http://bsdly.blogspot.com.au/2008/10/ietf-failed-to-account-for-greylisting.html
Not only is greylisting fine from a protocol p
Steve Shockley [steve.shock...@shockley.net] wrote:
>
> We Americans have to enjoy the bars, there's not much left to do
> besides drink.
There's always "bath salts" and eating off homeless people's faces.
On 2012-06-02 13:19, JC)rC)mie CourrC(ges-Anglas wrote:
As you'll see in my signature above, 8 bit characters are mangled on
OpenBSD mailing lists. Not that I care much, but passing the demime perl
script a ''-8'' argument would be enough to solve that (if that is
desired).
AFAIK SMTP without M
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 12:37:07AM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> Alan Corey writes:
> >They probably aren't broken, looks like I need to link in some library. I
> >get "undefined reference to" when I try to compile/link. Shouldn't this
> >be mentioned in the man page?
>
> FreeBSD has a "L
Peter Kay wrote:
> GPT is a foregone conclusion unless you are blind to the future. The only
> alternative is OS specific disk hackery, and that does no-one any favours.
Well, OpenBSD/i386 (and now /amd64) has used such hackery since the
very beginning and doesn't fare too badly with it.
Back i
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 22:53:54 +1000
David Diggles wrote:
> "Greylisting will cause longer delivery delays if the sender has a large
> infrastructure and is sending from a different IP when it retries.
Most pooling Services like Yahoo and Google seem to get through
eventually these days without whi
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 12:34:04PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2012-06-04, David Diggles wrote:
> > I was just thinking surely resending from a different IP breaks the RFC for
> > SMTP?
> >
> > Then I did some googling, and found this.
> > http://bsdly.blogspot.com.au/2008/10/ietf-failed-
On 2012-06-04, ted@comcast.net wrote:
>
> This morning (before I came to work), I noticed the system wasn't
> responding.B I went to the basement, got out my really old laptop as a serial
> console, and noticed the system was giving a "ddb>" prompt.
>
> Just for kicks, I reboo ted, and at som
On 2012-06-04, David Diggles wrote:
> I was just thinking surely resending from a different IP breaks the RFC for
> SMTP?
>
> Then I did some googling, and found this.
> http://bsdly.blogspot.com.au/2008/10/ietf-failed-to-account-for-greylisting.html
>
> Thanks, Peter.
>
> So now it is 4 years la
On 2012-06-04, Robert Connolly wrote:
> Sometimes apmd crashes from a system suspend, and sometimes it does not.
>
> Sometimes xidle runs xlock, and sometimes it does not.
>
> Sometimes xlock asks for a password, and sometimes it does not.
>
> Can anyone tell me whether they have all of these work
Are these problems known?
Lynx ignores mailcap even after uncommenting
PERSONAL_MAILCAP:.mailcap
metamail makes "Segmentation fault (core dumped)".
Do someone know an alternative to metamail?
Rod.
>On Mon Jun 4 2012 08:16, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
>> UEFI has gotten more press, and given RH an opportunity to present
>> itself as defender of freedom, but it's really an evolution of PCs
>> running black-box code when and where it can do most harm.
>
>In fact, RH betrayed the OSS community
It'
On Mon Jun 4 2012 11:46, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
> >On Mon Jun 4 2012 08:16, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
> >> UEFI has gotten more press, and given RH an opportunity to present
> >> itself as defender of freedom
>
> I meant that sarcastically
Sure you did. I just wanted to highlight this point even
I was just thinking surely resending from a different IP breaks the RFC for
SMTP?
Then I did some googling, and found this.
http://bsdly.blogspot.com.au/2008/10/ietf-failed-to-account-for-greylisting.html
Thanks, Peter.
So now it is 4 years later, has anything happened?
>On Mon Jun 4 2012 08:16, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
>> UEFI has gotten more press, and given RH an opportunity to present
>> itself as defender of freedom
I meant that sarcastically
-- p
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 12:16:26AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 01:39:18PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer said that
> > > these must be some really nice disks :]
> > >
> > > for example only a 200G slice (also 64k/8k) of music/film/picture
> > > collection (not even full yet)
On Mon Jun 4 2012 08:16, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
> UEFI has gotten more press, and given RH an opportunity to present
> itself as defender of freedom, but it's really an evolution of PCs
> running black-box code when and where it can do most harm.
In fact, RH betrayed the OSS community by not try
Hello folks,
Here's a suggested improvement to spamd(8) that keeps blacklisted entries
tarpitted while they keep trying. Rationale: often blacklists like
uatraps will remove hosts because they have stopped trying there, but will
continue elsewhere. If your host is 'elsewhere', and a black
Ok;
After running that a few days, it works fine, but... the interval between
updates
is all over the place.
I rewrote it, to only change the sleep value under 2 circumstances:
First time run, or after a failure.
Now it's updating hourly again.
I will not make the same mistake of posting it t
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 03:02:46PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > >
> > > Relay how? Using smarthost? Possibly password protected? Then you
> > > need something like this:
> > >
> > > map "secrets" { source db "/etc/mail/secrets.db" }
> > > accept from ... for all relay via sm
Hi there,
I wanted to follow up with you about an email I sent a couple weeks ago
regarding a resource I had written primarily aimed at business professionals
and those with an interest in the business world. The research project
provides a comprehensive overview of various business sectors, issu
dump "xset -q" and "wsconsctl -a", compare working/non-working states, check
for possible race condition?
-- p
>"xset dpms 5 10 15" isn't doing anything either, nor "xset s 4".
>
>On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Robert Connolly <
>robertconnolly1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sometimes apmd crashes
"xset dpms 5 10 15" isn't doing anything either, nor "xset s 4".
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Robert Connolly <
robertconnolly1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sometimes apmd crashes from a system suspend, and sometimes it does not.
>
> Sometimes xidle runs xlock, and sometimes it does not.
>
> Someti
41 matches
Mail list logo
