Hello.
I have heard on IRC that I am running a vulnerable version of Firefox,
despite running 'pkg_add -a -u', on my OpenBSD 5.2 system. The advice I
got was to run snapshots, because OpenBSD does not have the human
resources to maintain packages. I understand this is a problem, but I
want to
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 02:21:59PM -0800, Robert Connolly wrote:
> I would like to hear comments about using pf to filter user/group,
> to make sure Firefox uses a proxy. The idea behind this is to stop
> Firefox from leaking my IP. Is this the most efficient way to do
> this?
I block an user usin
Ok. I took the suggestions, and now have:
Xephyr -screen 1358x693 :1 & ssh -Xf firefox@localhost 'twm -display :1
& firefox -no-remote --display :1'
I found the xsel(1) scripts to do copying and pasting from different
displays, and it works with some getting used to. I intend to make some
tit
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 01:52:10PM +0100, Martin Kjær Jørgensen wrote:
> Sounds like OpenBSD is not quite ready for being a production Access Point.
Well, that depends on your needs. But yes, alternatives like OpenWRT are
tuned better for use as a speedy access point and run on smaller devices
tha
HI ..hehe ya i know but its for kids :D and its not about fame and
glory...
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:03:50AM +0530, Jay Patel wrote:
> > Hi all ..
> >
> > is OpenBSD taking part in google code-in :
>
> The answer is No, as far as I'
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Alexander Hall wrote:
>
> I still want to know the reason for all this. If it's for security, it sure
> feels ass-backwards and questionable at best.
>
it's useful for honeypot scenarios, with all proposed solutions so far
being influenced by either lazyness or d
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 06:24:38PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:00:07PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> > On 12/15/12 11:45, Martin Kjær Jørgensen wrote:
> > > Do you think an AMD Elan 133 Mhz is "modern" enough for at 54/mbit
> > > wireless WPA2 throughput?
> >
> > Are
Andres Perera wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Paul de Weerd
>wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 06:38:08AM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
>> | On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Paul de Weerd
>wrote:
>> | > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:02:31AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
>> | > | > .profile can
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 06:38:08AM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
> | On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> | > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:02:31AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> | > | > .profile can be interrupted with ctrl+c.
>
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 06:38:08AM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
| On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:02:31AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
| > | > .profile can be interrupted with ctrl+c.
| > |
| > | >>> Because it is under controle or the user and he/s
btw, this program should be the only entry in /etc/shells so only root
is allowed privacy
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Andres Perera wrote:
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #define sp "/usr/bin/script"
> #define sf "/var/db/ghetto_act/%ju"
>
> main()
> {
> char *so;
> if (asprintf(
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:02:31AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> | > .profile can be interrupted with ctrl+c.
> |
> | >>> Because it is under controle or the user and he/she can disable
> | >>> such funcionality.
> |
> | the safer way imho is p
My guess, compliance to some standard
Den 16 dec 2012 11:17 skrev "Paul de Weerd" :
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:02:31AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> | > .profile can be interrupted with ctrl+c.
> |
> | >>> Because it is under controle or the user and he/she can disable
> | >>> such funcionality.
>
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:02:31AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
| > .profile can be interrupted with ctrl+c.
|
| >>> Because it is under controle or the user and he/she can disable
| >>> such funcionality.
|
| the safer way imho is patching ksh
After that, expect all your users to suddenly switch t
> .profile can be interrupted with ctrl+c.
>>> Because it is under controle or the user and he/she can disable
>>> such funcionality.
the safer way imho is patching ksh
11 dec 2012 kl. 11:40 skrev Joel Carnat :
> Hello,
>
> I want to achieve a Master / Slave replication with OpenBSD's shipped
> ldapd(8).
>
> Are there any native features to synchronize both instances (like openldap's
> syncrepl) or do I have to script a bunch of (ldapsearch/ldapadd)|scp ?
Th
16 matches
Mail list logo
