Re: altroot is not mentioned in FAQ [diff]

2007-11-08 Thread Hannah Schroeter
Hi! On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 05:17:35PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: >On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Nick Holland wrote: >>Really. /altroot is useful for certain things, but ONLY certain >>things. Don't call it a backup, as it isn't rotated. You have >I do backup everything. >It's just that altroot is s

Re: altroot is not mentioned in FAQ [diff]

2007-11-07 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Nick Holland wrote: Really. /altroot is useful for certain things, but ONLY certain things. Don't call it a backup, as it isn't rotated. You have I do backup everything. It's just that altroot is so easy to get a file you erased by mistake. rm /etc/myfile... err fuck... m

Re: altroot is not mentioned in FAQ [diff]

2007-11-07 Thread Henning Brauer
* Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-07 04:22]: > (add to that that Thunderbird is a brain-dead piece of shit when it > comes to handling diffs in general and classic diffs even more so. > Apparently, either Thunderbird devs aren't programmers or they never > show their diffs to each other.) or the

Re: altroot is not mentioned in FAQ [diff]

2007-11-07 Thread Nick Holland
Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Nick Holland wrote: >> what benefit do you see in having /altroot on the same disk as / ? > > See the thread "Regenerating damaged /etc" ;) > see /var/backup. :) Really. /altroot is useful for certain things, but ONLY certain things. Don't call it

Re: altroot is not mentioned in FAQ [diff]

2007-11-07 Thread Nick Holland
Jan Stary wrote: ... > See at bottom; looks much simpler now, hmm :-) > I leave the RAID analogy to someone else. > > Anyway, first diff, screwed up, I'd prefer the term, "learning experience". > thanks for all the comments. > > Jan > > > Index: faq4.html > =

Re: altroot is not mentioned in FAQ [diff]

2007-11-06 Thread Jan Stary
Hi all, finally, a comment from someone who has a say in that. > > this is a diff to faq4.html (the install faq) so that it mentions > > /altroot for the installing user before he partitions his drive. Now, > > the altroot feature is described in daily(8), which you only read when > > you already

Re: altroot is not mentioned in FAQ [diff]

2007-11-06 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Nick Holland wrote: what benefit do you see in having /altroot on the same disk as / ? See the thread "Regenerating damaged /etc" ;) -- Antoine

Re: altroot is not mentioned in FAQ [diff]

2007-11-06 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 01:23:55PM +1100, RW wrote: > On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:26:04 -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: > > > > >Perhaps there needs to be a new fork: OldBSD: Unix for the Ages. > > s/Ages/Aged/ ?? > > Given that I joined IBM in 1962, I am allowed to make such jokes. > ~|^ > = Ha!

Re: altroot is not mentioned in FAQ [diff]

2007-11-06 Thread Nick Holland
Jan Stary wrote: > Hi all, > > this is a diff to faq4.html (the install faq) so that it mentions > /altroot for the installing user before he partitions his drive. Now, > the altroot feature is described in daily(8), which you only read when > you already have a system installed, your disk is alre

Re: altroot is not mentioned in FAQ [diff]

2007-11-06 Thread RW
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:26:04 -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: > >Perhaps there needs to be a new fork: OldBSD: Unix for the Ages. s/Ages/Aged/ ?? Given that I joined IBM in 1962, I am allowed to make such jokes. ~|^ = >From the land "down under": Australia. Do we look from up over?

Re: altroot is not mentioned in FAQ [diff]

2007-11-06 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:11:55PM +0100, ropers wrote: > On 06/11/2007, Jan Stary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is using a larger disk in the example a problem? Using a 20G disk makes > > the point of showing how usable the system is even on a small disk, but > > 20G disks don't really exist anym

Re: altroot is not mentioned in FAQ [diff]

2007-11-06 Thread Marcus Andree
> > 20G disks don't really exist anymore. > > >O RLY? > > > I always thought my 20 Gig HDD was the largest of my eight drives. > Are you saying it's Schroedinger's hard drive? > > What about the others? > My 200 MB would like to have a little word with you, and it doesn't > look like it's p

Re: altroot is not mentioned in FAQ [diff]

2007-11-06 Thread ropers
On 06/11/2007, Jan Stary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > PS: As this is a small diff, I edited (my copy of) faq4.html manually; > but if I was to write up something bigger - is there some script(1)-like > log of the whole installation, or can I create one? Drop into shell at > the very beginning, an

Re: altroot is not mentioned in FAQ [diff]

2007-11-06 Thread ropers
On 06/11/2007, Jan Stary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is using a larger disk in the example a problem? Using a 20G disk makes > the point of showing how usable the system is even on a small disk, but > 20G disks don't really exist anymore. O RLY? I always thought my 20 Gig HDD was the lar

Re: altroot is not mentioned in FAQ [diff]

2007-11-06 Thread Jan Stary
Hi all, this is a diff to faq4.html (the install faq) so that it mentions /altroot for the installing user before he partitions his drive. Now, the altroot feature is described in daily(8), which you only read when you already have a system installed, your disk is already partitioned, and typicall