Re: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-22 Thread Mark Maunder
Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > what is wrong with DONE? DONE immediatly closes the client > > connection > > > and starts the logging phase. if you have sent the content already > > > then there is nothing to worry about. the call to send_http_header > > > will pick up on the any status you set p

RE: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-22 Thread Geoffrey Young
> > what is wrong with DONE? DONE immediatly closes the client > connection > > and starts the logging phase. if you have sent the content already > > then there is nothing to worry about. the call to send_http_header > > will pick up on the any status you set previously or use the default >

Re: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-22 Thread Nikolaus Rath
* Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nikolaus Rath wrote: > >> * Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > If I'm using stacked handlers, what should I return if I dont want the >> > next handler in line to run because I've returned all required content >> > to the client?

Re: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-22 Thread Nikolaus Rath
* Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If I'm using stacked handlers, what should I return if I >> > > dont want the next handler in line to run because I've returned >> > > all >> required content to the client? (the eagle book says >> > > anything other than >> OK,

Re: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-21 Thread Mark Maunder
Geoffrey Young wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark Maunder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 1:49 PM > > To: Nikolaus Rath > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: stacked handlers return vals > > >

RE: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-21 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Maunder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 1:49 PM > To: Nikolaus Rath > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: stacked handlers return vals > > > Nikolaus Rath wrote: > > > * Mark Maunder

Re: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-21 Thread Mark Maunder
Nikolaus Rath wrote: > * Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If I'm using stacked handlers, what should I return if I dont want the > > next handler in line to run because I've returned all required content > > to the client? (the eagle book says anything other than OK, DECLIN

Re: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-20 Thread Nikolaus Rath
* Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > If I'm using stacked handlers, what should I return if I dont want the > next handler in line to run because I've returned all required content > to the client? (the eagle book says anything other than OK, DECLINED > or DONE, but what's the appr