Hello!
I can't pull from venge.net server more, host unreachable.
The web server work fine (but reply come from off.net, while
request was to www.venge.net).
> traceroute venge.net
traceroute to venge.net (66.96.28.3), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 * * *
2 mpls1-giga1-2.msk.corbina.net (85.2
On 1/15/06, Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:31:13PM -0500, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
> > This won't handle all situations: suppose a merge revision that adds a
> > file. I can't direct monotone to add a new file via merge hook.
>
> Correct. If you want to do th
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:31:13PM -0500, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
> This won't handle all situations: suppose a merge revision that adds a
> file. I can't direct monotone to add a new file via merge hook.
Correct. If you want to do this properly, I see basically two
options:
-- link in sourcepul
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:31:13PM -0500, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
> This won't handle all situations: suppose a merge revision that adds a
> file. I can't direct monotone to add a new file via merge hook.
Yeah, but on the other hand I don't think you can reasonably add a
file in a merge node that w
This won't handle all situations: suppose a merge revision that adds a
file. I can't direct monotone to add a new file via merge hook.
Yury.
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 14:19 +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> Yes, you'll need to set manual_merge to true. A switch to merge to
> imply this for all files i
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:02:04PM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> Note that if monotone can merge a file without conflicts, then it
> doesn't call the merge hook on that file at all.
Yes, you'll need to set manual_merge to true. A switch to merge to
imply this for all files in this commit is p
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 13:34 +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:21:27PM -0500, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
> > The other way is to hack SP and make it call regular monotone commands.
> > In this latter case, of course it'd be nice if the tool worked with
> > standard monotone rele
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:21:27PM -0500, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
> The other way is to hack SP and make it call regular monotone commands.
> In this latter case, of course it'd be nice if the tool worked with
> standard monotone releases, not some specially patched ones. So I'm
> just looking for a
Oh, ok. I knew I was missing something obvious. Sorry for not RTFMing
enough.
I'm not talking about a quick hack but rather a complete lossless
converter from BK to monotone. The way to do this is to either integrate
infamous SourcePuller (by A.Tridgell) inside monotone. However that
would probabl
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 07:59:55PM -0500, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
> Thanks all for replies!
>
> I was 99% sure that the solution would be to commit my merged tree as a
> child to revA and then call some fancy "monotone db execute 'insert...'"
> to draw an additional edge in revision graph from revB
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 07:59:55PM -0500, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
> Thanks all for replies!
>
> I was 99% sure that the solution would be to commit my merged tree as a
> child to revA and then call some fancy "monotone db execute 'insert...'"
> to draw an additional edge in revision graph from revB
Thanks all for replies!
I was 99% sure that the solution would be to commit my merged tree as a
child to revA and then call some fancy "monotone db execute 'insert...'"
to draw an additional edge in revision graph from revB to a newly
created revC.
Does anyone has a short explanation why such ``
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:56:45AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> While doing a rather large netsync, I noticed the monotone ticker switch from
> "99 M" to the rather unhelpful "0.1 G".
>
> The following patch adds a few more steps in the kiB -> MiB -> GiB steps,
> hopefully providing a bit
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 04:21:57PM -0500, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
> I have a tree at some state. If I want to commit it as a child to ONE
> revision I simply do echo $REVISION >MT/revision; monotone commit.
>
> Now HOW to commit a tree as a child to TWO revisions? I.e. I want
> current revision to
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 04:21:57PM -0500, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
> I'm rephrasing my last question.
>
> I have a tree at some state. If I want to commit it as a child to ONE
> revision I simply do echo $REVISION >MT/revision; monotone commit.
>
> Now HOW to commit a tree as a child to TWO revisi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:21:57 -0500, Yury
Polyanskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
ypolyans> Now HOW to commit a tree as a child to TWO revisions? I.e. I
ypolyans> want current revision to be a child of revA and revB (as if
ypolyans> it were a merge, though I did all mer
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 16:21 -0500, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
> Hey guys!
>
> I'm rephrasing my last question.
>
> I have a tree at some state. If I want to commit it as a child to ONE
> revision I simply do echo $REVISION >MT/revision; monotone commit.
>
> Now HOW to commit a tree as a child to TW
Hey guys!
I'm rephrasing my last question.
I have a tree at some state. If I want to commit it as a child to ONE
revision I simply do echo $REVISION >MT/revision; monotone commit.
Now HOW to commit a tree as a child to TWO revisions? I.e. I want
current revision to be a child of revA and revB (
While doing a rather large netsync, I noticed the monotone ticker switch from
"99 M" to the rather unhelpful "0.1 G".
The following patch adds a few more steps in the kiB -> MiB -> GiB steps,
hopefully providing a bit more resolution.
2006-01-15 Jack Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* ui.
Hi,
it seems monotone-viz has a problem with refresh, and crashes. The
output I got is attached.
I don't know even where to begin looking, as I don't know one bit of
OCaml. If there's anything I can do to help track this, please tell
me.
I dunno if it helps to know this: I run on Debian [unsta
Nathaniel Smith spake unto us the following wisdom:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 02:16:40PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> > Heh, on the other hand, the same thing usually happens to the
> > translators as well, and I guess the worst is when you end up with a
> > bunch of fuzzy entries.
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 02:16:40PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> Heh, on the other hand, the same thing usually happens to the
> translators as well, and I guess the worst is when you end up with a
> bunch of fuzzy entries. Other than that, I don't really see the harm,
> but being
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:25:57 -0800, Nathaniel
Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
njs> On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 12:27:49PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
wrote:
njs> Where did you get the monotone.pot?
It gets generated by po/Makefile, the target $(DOMAIN).pot-up
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 15 Jan 2006 02:07:41 -0800, Nathaniel
Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
njs> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:20:52AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
wrote:
njs> I just know that every once in a while ('make dist', mostly) make
njs> decides to regenerate the .
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:20:52AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:25:57 -0800, Nathaniel
> Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> njs> It isn't checked in to the source tree, and the versions in
> njs> distributed tarballs are really
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:20:52 +0100 (CET),
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
richard> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:25:57 -0800,
Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
richard>
richard> njs> On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 1
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 12:27:49PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just pushed a current Swedish translation of monotone strings
> (copied from monotone.pot). I was a bit surprised there was so little
> to translate, but thought it would at least be a start.
Where did you
27 matches
Mail list logo
