oh right. The email about it is here
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.nlp.moses.user/5882/
Use the moses library but not the moses command line. Also built a
C-based wrapper for the library - mainly to encourage people to develop
gui in other languages, Java, C#, VB etc.
It doesn't do la
No, you weren't talking about the lattice output - you were talking
about the moses library.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Hieu Hoang wrote:
> Wasn't me. I don't know much about the lattice output
>
> Hieu
> Sent from my flying horse
>
> On 5 Jun 2012, at 09:07 PM, Lane Schwartz wrote:
>
>> I
Wasn't me. I don't know much about the lattice output
Hieu
Sent from my flying horse
On 5 Jun 2012, at 09:07 PM, Lane Schwartz wrote:
> I think Hieu mentioned recently that there is a Moses library that
> gets compiled, with an API that could be called. I've never used it,
> though.
>
> On Tue
I think Hieu mentioned recently that there is a Moses library that
gets compiled, with an API that could be called. I've never used it,
though.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Holger Schwenk
wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 06:45 PM, Philipp Koehn wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> An intermediate step could be to us
On 06/05/2012 06:45 PM, Philipp Koehn wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> An intermediate step could be to use the CSLM to rescore lattices which
>> are likely to be a much richer dump of the search space than n-best
>> lists. Can Moses create lattices which include all the (14) feature
>> function scores ?
> When u
Hi,
> An intermediate step could be to use the CSLM to rescore lattices which
> are likely to be a much richer dump of the search space than n-best
> lists. Can Moses create lattices which include all the (14) feature
> function scores ?
When using the switch "-osgx FILE", a detailed score breakd
On 06/04/2012 01:50 PM, Lane Schwartz wrote:
> Marcello,
>
> A GPL project can definitely use components from an LGPL project. So
> in the worst case, integration of the two could be done, distributing
> the whole combined work as a modification of CSLM. Not that I'm
> proposing we do that.
>
> In
Marcello,
A GPL project can definitely use components from an LGPL project. So
in the worst case, integration of the two could be done, distributing
the whole combined work as a modification of CSLM. Not that I'm
proposing we do that.
In any case, what I meant by integration was doing the coding
I suppose that an integration is not compatible with the current license of
CSLM.
GPL cannot be integrated into LGPL.
Please, correct me if I'm wrong.
Cheers, Marcello
---
Short from my mobile phone
On 04/giu/2012, at 06:12, "Lane Schwartz" wrote:
> Excellent! Thank you for releasing th
Excellent! Thank you for releasing this, Holger!
I know you had mentioned that you'd like to get this integrated into
the decoder. Has anyone from your group been able to work on that?
Cheers,
Lane
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Holger Schwenk
wrote:
> I'm happy to announce the availability o
I'm happy to announce the availability of a new version of the
continuous space
language model (CSLM) toolkit.
Continuous space methods we first introduced by Yoshua Bengio in 2001 [1].
The basic idea of this approach is to project the word indices onto a
continuous space and to use a probabilit
11 matches
Mail list logo