Re: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-03 Thread craig miller
Time to respond to David. I've let a 40 hours go by. I've been working. >I don't want to dis Craig and Connie, who are giving us bottom-line >politics. We don't elect Republicans, so Republicans spank us. >However, as citizens, we should expect politicians to have a concept of the >colle

Re: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-03 Thread Terrell Brown
Rosalind Nelson takes note of Duke PowellÂ’s comment: > >Over the years local governments have found that, instead of retiring the TIF District after 10 years, it was quite attractive to "re-up" it and treat the resulting revenues as "found money." These monies have been used to fund pet projects t

Re: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-03 Thread Rosalind Nelson
At 10:39 PM 7/2/01 -0500, Duke Powell wrote: > >Over the years local governments have found >that, instead of retiring the TIF District >after 10 years, it was quite attractive to >"re-up" it and treat the resulting revenues >as "found money." These monies have been >used to fund pet projects

Re: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-02 Thread Duke Powell
I am going to jump in here because there are some glaring misunderstandings about why the Legislature did what it did with Tax Increment Financing in the just completed legislative session. TIF is a complicated subject and I do not pretend to understand it. What I do understand is that a great m

RE: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-02 Thread Alan Shilepsky
Minneapoliticans feel the city is being persecuted by Republican legislators because this city elects no Republicans. Though I didn't spend this session at the Capitol I'm sure there is more to it than that. When I campaigned for Denn Evans for State Rep 60B last year I tried to point out to v

RE: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-02 Thread Russell W Peterson
Just imagine for once that you are someone who lives in the suburban, exurban or rural area of the state. You have an opportunity to reduce your property taxes by between $500 and $1,500 per year. And the biggest sacrifice is a program in Minneapolis called NRP. First of all, do you actually kn

Re: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-02 Thread wizardmarks
Constance Sheppard wrote: > perhaps NRP isn't in the interest of the majority of > Minnesotans, and was thus destined to fail. The house and senate were brought into the NRP planning early on. The voted to an encoded that they would support it to the tune of $20 million/year for 20 years. In o

RE: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-02 Thread Gene Martinez
ist Subject: RE: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls >I have heard ad nauseam from DFLers of >every stripe >that Republicans hate Minneapolis. > >It's as if they >feel that if they say it often enough >it will become >true. >The Republicans and the GOP House > >

RE: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-02 Thread Rich Chandler
I have heard ad nauseam from DFLers of every stripe that Republicans hate Minneapolis. It's as if they feel that if they say it often enough it will become true. The Republicans and the GOP House caucus don't hate Minneapolis. They have a different view on public policy. It is a very immature

RE: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-02 Thread Eva Young
Great points Connie! At 01:41 PM 7/2/01 -0700, Constance Sheppard wrote: >Without getting too far into minutiae, I'll say for >the record that it was Wizard Marks, and not our >esteemed moderator who used the adjectives to which I >referred. It is not surprising to hear bigoted statements about R

RE: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-02 Thread Evan Schnell
> > Elected politicians, when faced with a large-scale > common sentiment about something or other in their > district, ARE NOT going to ignore that, plain and > simple. Right or wrong, we all have different > perspectives, which are colored in part by where we > live and who lives there with u

RE: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-02 Thread Constance Sheppard
Without getting too far into minutiae, I'll say for the record that it was Wizard Marks, and not our esteemed moderator who used the adjectives to which I referred. No Matter. I was not (neccessarily) trying to suggest that we elect Republicans in Mpls and that will solve our problems. I was po

RE: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-02 Thread David Brauer
people exist within their party, not expect us to respond to negatively motivation. David Brauer King Field - Ward 10 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of craig miller Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 2:20 PM To: Constance Sheppard; jorovsky; [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-02 Thread craig miller
01 1:29 PM Subject: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls >This point has been referenced earlier, but I see a >need for it to be spelled out: > >Republicans are in the majority in the House. We in >Minneapolis did not elect a single one of them. These >folks try to do what their const

[Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-02 Thread Constance Sheppard
This point has been referenced earlier, but I see a need for it to be spelled out: Republicans are in the majority in the House. We in Minneapolis did not elect a single one of them. These folks try to do what their constituents will like, so they can preserve their seat. Why WOULD they be cho

Re: [Mpls] Legislature & Mpls

2001-07-01 Thread jorovsky
wizardmarks wrote: > (snip) However, I was appalled by the hatefulness of the reps and > sens against Minneapolis. These folks knew they had the > power and the numbers to "opt out" of supporting anything > the city of Minneapolis wanted and they did just that out of > what appeared to be pure s