On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Grant Swanjord
wrote:
> Would this include "narrator" attributions?
I would include them as "spoken", but I don't work on audiobooks. If
you think a separate "narrator" attribute is needed, feel free to
suggest it as a sub-type of spoken. I think this would be an
Would this include "narrator" attributions?
-- Grant
On Jan 25, 2011 1:16 PM, "Nikki" wrote:
> +1 from me too, spoken stuff is the main reason I need to use "other"
> for vocals.
>
> and since you didn't include it, this proposal expires on the 30th
> (around 2am CET, so still the 29th for a lot
+1 from me too, spoken stuff is the main reason I need to use "other"
for vocals.
and since you didn't include it, this proposal expires on the 30th
(around 2am CET, so still the 29th for a lot of people ;))
Nikki
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> I would like to propose adding a "spoken" att
+1
2011/1/23 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
> I would like to propose adding a "spoken" attribute to the vocal tree.
> The separate "Speaker Relationship Type" (RFC-55) is abandoned, and
> honestly, I'd say there is no reason to consider speech as different
> from the rest of the vocal tree. "speech"
I would like to propose adding a "spoken" attribute to the vocal tree.
The separate "Speaker Relationship Type" (RFC-55) is abandoned, and
honestly, I'd say there is no reason to consider speech as different
from the rest of the vocal tree. "speech" is a part of the advanced
vocal tree pre-proposal
