Re: [ANNOUNCE] 1.5.20 released

2009-06-14 Thread bill lam
Many thanks for detail steps and explanation. I compiled and am now using the new mutt. -- regards, GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 1.5.20 released

2009-06-14 Thread Brendan Cully
On Monday, 15 June 2009 at 09:25, bill lam wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Brendan Cully wrote: > > Silly autoconf. Try: > > autoreconf -i > > ./config.status --recheck > > ./config.status > > I tried > > $ autoconf -i ./config.status > /usr/bin/m4:aclocal.m4:917: cannot open `m4/libgnutls.m4': No

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 1.5.20 released

2009-06-14 Thread bill lam
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Brendan Cully wrote: > Silly autoconf. Try: > autoreconf -i > ./config.status --recheck > ./config.status I tried $ autoconf -i ./config.status /usr/bin/m4:aclocal.m4:917: cannot open `m4/libgnutls.m4': No such file or directory autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 1.5.20 released

2009-06-14 Thread Brendan Cully
On Monday, 15 June 2009 at 08:46, bill lam wrote: > > Mutt 1.5.20 is out at the usual locations. This release contains an > > After hg pull and update. It failed to make or even make clean with error > message. > > make: *** No rule to make target `m4/libgnutls.m4', needed by > `Makefile.in' > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 1.5.20 released

2009-06-14 Thread bill lam
> Mutt 1.5.20 is out at the usual locations. This release contains an After hg pull and update. It failed to make or even make clean with error message. make: *** No rule to make target `m4/libgnutls.m4', needed by `Makefile.in' I can build earlier 1.5.19 version without problem. Any idea how to

Re: Mutt on Mac: MuttToMail

2009-06-14 Thread Charlie Kester
On Sat 13 Jun 2009 at 18:26:27 PDT Greg Darke wrote: Support for this is already built directly into iTerm. You have to set up a bookmark explicitly for mutt (mine has the command '/sw/bin/mutt "$$URL$$"'), and then bind this command to the mailto url (in the application preferences). Cool. Wh

Re: Set From: address with hook match on To: address?

2009-06-14 Thread dave
On (23:43 14/06/09), Michael Tatge put forth the proposition: * On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 08:47PM +0100 d...@unrealize.co.uk (d...@unrealize.co.uk) muttered: Is it possible to apply some sort of regexp on the To: address to work out what to put for From:? Are you looking for reverse_name maybe?

Re: Set From: address with hook match on To: address?

2009-06-14 Thread dave
On (15:59 14/06/09), Patrick Shanahan put forth the proposition: * d...@unrealize.co.uk [06-14-09 15:50]: Is it possible to apply some sort of regexp on the To: address to work out what to put for From:? At the moment I use folder hooks but it would be useful to do it based on To: Have you

Re: "Intelligent" (per-message) mbox-hook?

2009-06-14 Thread Steffen Schuldenzucker
On 19:18 Sun 14 Jun , Rocco Rutte wrote: > Hi, > > * Steffen Schuldenzucker wrote: > > > I guess I'm not the first one hitting this problem, so - Is there any > > way to solve it? > > Maybe, use define mbox-hook in message-hook for per-message like so: > > message-hook ~A 'unhook mbox-

Re: Set From: address with hook match on To: address?

2009-06-14 Thread Michael Tatge
* On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 08:47PM +0100 d...@unrealize.co.uk (d...@unrealize.co.uk) muttered: > Is it possible to apply some sort of regexp on the To: address to work > out what to put for From:? Are you looking for reverse_name maybe? HTH, Michael -- *** PUBLIC flooding detected from erikyyy TH

Re: Set From: address with hook match on To: address?

2009-06-14 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* d...@unrealize.co.uk [06-14-09 15:50]: > Is it possible to apply some sort of regexp on the To: address to work > out what to put for From:? > > At the moment I use folder hooks but it would be useful to do it based > on To: Have you considered send2-hook, described in TFM? -- Patrick Shanah

Set From: address with hook match on To: address?

2009-06-14 Thread dave
Is it possible to apply some sort of regexp on the To: address to work out what to put for From:? At the moment I use folder hooks but it would be useful to do it based on To: Cheers David -- "I wish there was a knob on the TV to turn up the intelligence. There's a knob called `brightness', but

[ANNOUNCE] 1.5.20 released

2009-06-14 Thread Brendan Cully
Hi all, Mutt 1.5.20 is out at the usual locations. This release contains an enormous number of bugfixes (Rocco has been on a rampage), and the following high-level changes: ! $fcc_attach is a quadoption now + $honor_disposition to honor Content-Disposition headers + $search_context specifie

Re: mapi support

2009-06-14 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2009-06-14, Asif Iqbal wrote: > Is there a way to get mail through mapi from exchange server > 2007? > > imap or pop3 is not open. Yes, but it's very, very, ugly (which is generally true of anything involving MS Exchange Server). First you need a windows PC with Outlook. Second, you need a

Re: mapi support

2009-06-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Asif Iqbal wrote: > Is there a way to get mail through mapi from exchange server 2007? At the moment: no. I don't know of anybody working on it. Rocco

Re: "Intelligent" (per-message) mbox-hook?

2009-06-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Steffen Schuldenzucker wrote: > I guess I'm not the first one hitting this problem, so - Is there any > way to solve it? Maybe, use define mbox-hook in message-hook for per-message like so: message-hook ~A 'unhook mbox-hook' message-hook 'mbox-hook ...' The drawback like with

mapi support

2009-06-14 Thread Asif Iqbal
Is there a way to get mail through mapi from exchange server 2007? imap or pop3 is not open. -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

Re: 'mailboxes' command misbehaving?

2009-06-14 Thread Steve Revilak
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >From: Khusro Jaleel >Replying to myself here. I believe I have found the cause of the problem AND >fixed it. We shall see. > >After finding out about the 'noatime' flag on the partition, googling 'mutt >noatime' immediately gave >results that were

Re: 'mailboxes' command misbehaving?

2009-06-14 Thread Khusro Jaleel
Replying to myself here. I believe I have found the cause of the problem AND fixed it. We shall see. After finding out about the 'noatime' flag on the partition, googling 'mutt noatime' immediately gave results that were much more relevant to my problem. For example, from the Mutt wiki: http:/

Re: 'mailboxes' command misbehaving?

2009-06-14 Thread Khusro Jaleel
* Steve Revilak (st...@srevilak.net) wrote: > $ wc -l foo.txt > 2 foo.txt > $ ls -l foo.txt > 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 srevilak users 58 Jun 13 20:20 foo.txt > $ ls -lu foo.txt > 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 srevilak users 58 Jun 13 20:23 foo.txt Many thanks for your investigative work, Steve, I