On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 09:49:29AM -0600, Philip Molter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 02:00:58AM -0800, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
: On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:25:07PM +0800, Ares Liu wrote:
:
: So, could you give me some advice that if it is feasible ? Or show
: me your successful cases of
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:25:07PM +0800, Ares Liu wrote:
So, could you give me some advice that if it is feasible ? Or show
me your successful cases of using mySQL which is supporting very
large DB or tables with details ?
How about a table with 260 million rows? We've got one that is
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 02:00:58AM -0800, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
: On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:25:07PM +0800, Ares Liu wrote:
:
: So, could you give me some advice that if it is feasible ? Or show
: me your successful cases of using mySQL which is supporting very
: large DB or tables with
All,
Now I want to design a database which contains more than 10G data to use. I
think the largest table in my db will contains more than 30 million records
and the amount of this kind of table will be up to 7 or 10. In my instance
there won't be so many clients connecting. normally, there are
Thanks very much Paul,
Could you like to tell me what time spent in your querying ten thousands of
records from tables one time? In my test, when I query 10,000 records from a
table which contains 17 millions records total, it will cost less than 1
second of querying INDEX, or cost more than 30
