On Jun 23, 2006, at 12:45 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
The U.S. is poorly prepared for a major disruption of the Internet,
according to a study that an influential group of chief executives
will
publish today.
The Business Roundtable, composed of the CEOs of 160 large U.S.
companies,
said neit
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115102893799688389.html
In Event of Big Web Disruption, U.S. Is Ill-Prepared, Study Says
By VAUHINI VARA
June 23, 2006; Page B2
The U.S. is poorly prepared for a major disruption of the Internet,
according to a study that an influential group of chief executives
> How often do you think keys should change?
Arguably, any time someone who had access to the key is no longer
supposed
to have such access.
> I've never had anyone ask
> to change keys for about 50 session-years.
I guess the question the question is whether that's because the
On 22-jun-2006, at 23:17, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
Why not correct the protocol deficiency by introducing a new
option that
includes a KeyID? Wouldn't that approach provide a more comprehensive
solution to the problem?
That's a much better long-term strategy, though the exact mechanism
s
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:18:35 -0400, Ron Bonica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve,
>
> In Section 1 of your draft, you say:
>
>"The proper solution involves some sort of key management protocol.
>Apart from the complexity of such things, RFC 2385 was not written
>with key changes in
On 6/22/06, Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All of my discussions with Tor people have indicated [they] do not
> think I should have the right to deny traffic based on IP address,
> and that I should find other methods of authenticating traffic into
> my networks.
Isn't it rath
hey guys,
any luck? i actually need to find someone at comcast with clue as well.
any help you could provide would be most appreciated.
/blax
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Dennis Dayman wrote:
> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:39:20 -0500
> From: Dennis Dayman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Elijah Savage' <[EM
Sending your email to all three
-Dennis
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Elijah Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Comcast.net, Usa.net, Verizon
>
> Are there any
If you know where I could lay my hands on a few (5 at most) 5 meter
multimode duplex LC-LC jumpers in the Pittsburgh, PA area, please shoot me
a note off-list.
Thanks
jms
We're notifying them via JTF-GNO (DOD-CERT).
As it relates to .mil's you can get to their site here: http://www.jtfgno.mil/
On government or .gov's you can reach us at www.us-cert.gov
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Geo. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 08:42 AM
If anyone has a contact for the dns folks over at af.mil could you please
inform them that their authorative DNS servers have no A records so their
zone is failing to resolve for many people who have enabled anti-dnscache
poisoning features.
George Roettger
Netlink Services
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 05:37:25PM +1000, Matthew Sullivan wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> How an open proxy that will not connect to port 25 is relevant for
>> an *email* blacklist is beyond me.
> Perhaps because SORBS is not just an email blacklist?
My bad. I must have misunderstood its
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:58:34AM +1000, Matthew Sullivan wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:02:47PM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:
If the point of the technology is to add a degree of anonymity,
you can be pretty sure that a
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:58:34AM +1000, Matthew Sullivan wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:02:47PM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:
>>> If the point of the technology is to add a degree of anonymity,
>>> you can be pretty sure that a marker expressly designed to state
>>>
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 02:53:06PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:02:47PM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:
>> If the point of the technology is to add a degree of anonymity, you
>> can be pretty sure that a marker expressly designed to state the
>> message "Hi, I'm anonymou
15 matches
Mail list logo
