On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
> It's the same thing that happens if you toss a /8 on an IPv4 LAN and
> start banging away at the ARP table, while expecting all of your
> legitimate hosts within that /8 to continue working correctly. We all
> know that's crazy, right?
This
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 06:23:26PM +0200, Shepherd Magumo wrote:
> Odds are, they're looking for a willing host for a snowshoe spamming
> operation. If I wanted space for something like that, Afrinic
> region providers would not be my first choice...particularly for the
> hosti
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> I'm super-tired of the "but tcams are an expensive
>non-commodity part not subject to economies of scale". this
>has been repeated ad nauseam since the raws workshop if not before.
>
> You don't have to build a lookup engine around a tcam and
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
> On 3/11/2011 8:24 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>> --- b...@herrin.us wrote:
>> From: William Herrin
>>
>> No, it isn't. Contrary to mailing list best practices, NANOG
>> unsubscribe information is stubbornly stashed in the email headers
>> --
Hi
ls there any program/way to monitor the switch port/switch status when
it reaches to certain bandwidth?
Thank you so much
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 08:00 -0500, William Herrin wrote:
> You're either building a bunch of big TCAMs or a radix trie engine
> with sufficient parallelism to get the same aggregate lookup rate. If
> there's a materially different 3rd way to build a FIB, one that works
> at least as well, feel fre
Registration for NANOG 52 is open. Something new this time around: There
is a $25 discount for NewNOG members.
Please register soon and see you in Denver.
Dave
(for the NANOG PC)
___
NANOG-announce mailing list
nanog-annou...@nanog.org
https://mailman
I use this Nagios plugin for up/down status alerts, it has some support for
interface bandwidth (and errors/discards) monitoring. It's just a perl script
so you could easily modify it to suit your needs.
http://nagios.manubulon.com/snmp_int.html
-wil
On Mar 12, 2011, at 5:51 AM, Deric Kwok w
>Anyone have a list of MUAs that actually support RFC 2369 with
>subscription management widgets in the GUI? Surely someone has written
>one but I can't seem to find any documentation to that effect.
Alpine, which has what must be the cruddiest GUI on the planet, does.
Too bad people prefer glitz
--As of March 12, 2011 3:02:38 PM +, John Levine is alleged to have
said:
Anyone have a list of MUAs that actually support RFC 2369 with
subscription management widgets in the GUI? Surely someone has written
one but I can't seem to find any documentation to that effect.
Alpine, which has
William Herrin writes:
> Anyone have a list of MUAs that actually support RFC 2369 with
> subscription management widgets in the GUI? Surely someone has written
> one but I can't seem to find any documentation to that effect.
Gnus?
Jens, Gnus user since 1999
--
--
William Herrin writes:
> and you have to read the mail in Microsoft Lookout, interspersed with
> work-oriented messages from your boss and colleagues. With Outlook
> popping new-message-notifications up on the projector while you try to
> give a presentation during a meeting, each containing the
We use Solarwinds Orion for this stuff. We have some alerts for some switch
Ports configured.
You can get a trial version at www.solarwinds.com
2011/3/12 Wil Schultz
> I use this Nagios plugin for up/down status alerts, it has some support for
> interface bandwidth (and errors/discards) monitori
On 3/12/2011 10:02 AM, John Levine wrote:
>> Anyone have a list of MUAs that actually support RFC 2369 with
>> subscription management widgets in the GUI? Surely someone has written
>> one but I can't seem to find any documentation to that effect.
> Alpine, which has what must be the cruddiest GUI
Janos,
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Venkatesh Sriram wrote:
>
>> While I have used MD5 with OSPFv2, I never used authentication with
>> OSPFv3 since IPsec is (a) not available on all platforms (or/and
>> requires a special license) and (b) requires too much of coordination
>> with other folks to bring i
On 2011-03-12, at 2:31 AM, Joe Renwick wrote:
> These routers
> are configured as BGP route-reflectors.
...
> Niether
> soft nor hard clears on the BGP neighbors worked, only the config removal.
> Once re-applied life was good.
...
> The bug itself was with the BGP updates sent by the RR. Du
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Tom Limoncelli wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I think you'll be in for a surprise here, too. The 4G transition is already
>> underway. For the vendors where 4G means LTE, IPv6 is the native protocol
>> and IPv4 requires a certain
Now that is what Baldrick* would call "a cunning plan!"
And interesting examples.
Christian
*Apologies to Tony Robinson and Blackadder
On 12 Mar 2011, at 18:52, Tom Limoncelli wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Tom Limoncelli wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Owen DeLong wrot
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 08:16:19 EST, William Herrin said:
> Anyone have a list of MUAs that actually support RFC 2369 with
> subscription management widgets in the GUI? Surely someone has written
> one but I can't seem to find any documentation to that effect.
EXMH had that support long ago:
cvs re
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:10 PM, wrote:
> EXMH had that support long ago:
>
> cvs repository 4/9/1999
> Support for RFC2369. If a message contains RFC2369 compliant
> headers, a "List..." menu will appear with List related items
> on it. [ Note that this makes visible a mailto
On 12/03/11 5:16 AM, William Herrin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
On 3/11/2011 8:24 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- b...@herrin.us wrote:
From: William Herrin
No, it isn't. Contrary to mailing list best practices, NANOG
unsubscribe information is stubbornly stashed in
On 3/12/11 5:00 AM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>> I'm super-tired of the "but tcams are an expensive
>> non-commodity part not subject to economies of scale". this
>> has been repeated ad nauseam since the raws workshop if not before.
>>
>> You don
In message , Will
iam Herrin writes:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
> > On 3/11/2011 8:24 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> >> --- b...@herrin.us wrote:
> >> From: William Herrin
> >>
> >> No, it isn't. Contrary to mailing list best practices, NANOG
> >> unsubscribe information is s
--- b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
> On 3/11/2011 8:24 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>> --- b...@herrin.us wrote:
>> From: William Herrin
>>
>> No, it isn't. Contrary to mailing list best practices, NANOG
>> unsubscribe information is stubbornly stashed in the
--- b...@herrin.us wrote:
From: William Herrin
colleagues. With Outlook popping new-message-notifications up on the
projector while you try to give a presentation during a meeting, each
containing the sender and message subject...
--
I am happy I ha
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> On 3/12/11 5:00 AM, William Herrin wrote:
>> I'll be
>> convinced it can be done for less than 2x cost when someone actually
>> does it for less than 2x cost.
>
> part of the exercise is neither building nor buying the capacity before
> you ne
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 7:27 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> That must be my mistake then, because I thought the exercise was
> building it in a way that it stays built for the maximum practical
> number of years. When it has to be touched again (or tweaked if it
So when you upgrade a device, you alw
Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 04:13:13PM -0800, Owen DeLong
wrote:
On Mar 11, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Well, I at least think an option should be a /80, using the 48 bits
of MAC directly. This generates exactly the same collision potential
as
28 matches
Mail list logo
