RFC 6177:
This document obsoletes RFC 3177, updating its recommendations in the
following ways:
1) It is no longer recommended that /128s be given out. While
there may be some cases where assigning only a single address
may be justified, a site, by definition, impli
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 10:54:48 +0200, Ricardo Ferreira said:
> Is there anyone here working in an ISP where IPv6 is deployed?
> We are starting to plan the roll-out IPv6 to mobile subscribers (phones) I
> am interesting in knowing the mask you use for the assignment; whether it
> is /64 or /128.
>
>
* Baldur Norddahl
> Den 22. jul. 2016 20.25 skrev "Ca By" :
>
> > Phones, as in 3gpp? If so, each phone alway gets a /64, there is
> > no choice.
> >
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6459
>
> Here the cell companies are marketing their 4G LTE as an alternative
> to DSL, Coax and fiber for in
on behalf of Baldur Norddahl
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 4:10:41 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers
Den 22. jul. 2016 20.25 skrev "Ca By" :
> Phones, as in 3gpp? If so, each phone alway gets a /64, there is no
choice.
>
> https://tools
Den 22. jul. 2016 20.25 skrev "Ca By" :
> Phones, as in 3gpp? If so, each phone alway gets a /64, there is no
choice.
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6459
Here the cell companies are marketing their 4G LTE as an alternative to
DSL, Coax and fiber for internet access in your home with a 4G wifi
Good day,
On 22 Jul 2016, at 10:54, Ricardo Ferreira wrote:
> Is there anyone here working in an ISP where IPv6 is deployed?
I am not, but I can answer from the consumer's point of view:
> Basically a sole device will be connecting to the internet so I am
> wondering if this rule is follwed.
T
On Friday, July 22, 2016, Ricardo Ferreira
wrote:
> Is there anyone here working in an ISP where IPv6 is deployed?
> We are starting to plan the roll-out IPv6 to mobile subscribers (phones) I
> am interesting in knowing the mask you use for the assignment; whether it
> is /64 or /128.
>
> In RFC
NANOG
Subject: Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers
Ricardo,
I know from previous discussions on this list that Android phones are
looking for DHCPD leases and not /128's or /64's. From what I remember
this is due to the current requirement for multiple ipv6 subnets for
various applicati
Ricardo,
I know from previous discussions on this list that Android phones are
looking for DHCPD leases and not /128's or /64's. From what I remember
this is due to the current requirement for multiple ipv6 subnets for
various applications (vpns among others) to function correctly. As a
result G
Is there anyone here working in an ISP where IPv6 is deployed?
We are starting to plan the roll-out IPv6 to mobile subscribers (phones) I
am interesting in knowing the mask you use for the assignment; whether it
is /64 or /128.
In RFC 3177, it says:
3. Address Delegation Recommendations
The IE
10 matches
Mail list logo
