On 9/22/2014 08:35, David Hubbard wrote:
Got you beat by nine weeks with a Foundry 9604. :-)
The system uptime is 3411 days 7 hours 52 minutes 20 seconds
The system started at 01:38:44 Eastern Sat May 21 2005
That's the kind of waving I like to see.
--
The unique Characteristics of System Ad
On 9/22/2014 06:38, Alain Hebert wrote:
Properly configured, it is less a security issue than newer devices.
Pretty impressive from Matthew to have the patience/skills to not
simply "reload" that fridge over the years.
Whew! I was afraid I was the one who thought so anymore.
--
The un
lowed-out
> Wellfleet BCN ;)
>
> jms
>
>
> -Original Message-
>> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+jdevane=switchnap@nanog.org] On
>> Behalf Of Drew Weaver
>> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:58 AM
>> To: 'Matthew Crocker'
>> Cc: '
N ;)
jms
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+jdevane=switchnap@nanog.org] On Behalf Of
Drew Weaver
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:58 AM
To: 'Matthew Crocker'
Cc: 'nanog@nanog.org'
Subject: RE: Saying goodnight to my GSR
The best thing about
nt: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:58 AM
To: 'Matthew Crocker'
Cc: 'nanog@nanog.org'
Subject: RE: Saying goodnight to my GSR
The best thing about having GSRs around is trading them in for ASR 9900s.
The freight is a ding, though.
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mail
The best thing about having GSRs around is trading them in for ASR 9900s.
The freight is a ding, though.
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Crocker
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2014 10:19 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Saying goodnight to
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, David Hubbard wrote:
Got you beat by nine weeks with a Foundry 9604. :-)
I might have a Cat5505 or two on our out-of-band management network with
uptimes that approach this.
jms
#sh ver
SW: Version 03.3.01aTc1 Copyright (c) 1996-2004 Foundry Networks, Inc.
Compi
Got you beat by nine weeks with a Foundry 9604. :-)
#sh ver
SW: Version 03.3.01aTc1 Copyright (c) 1996-2004 Foundry Networks, Inc.
Compiled on Feb 01 2005 at 11:21:12 labeled as FES03301a
(2057881 bytes) from Primary foundry-FES/FES03301a.bin
Boot Monitor: Version 03.2.00Tc4
> And what, exactly, is it vulnerable to?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Sterling
>> Sent: Saturday, 20 September, 2014 12:06
>> To: Bacon Zombie
>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: Say
On 20/09/14 20:26, Jared Mauch wrote:
> OpenSNMPProject has some of this data for devices that respond to the string
> ‘public’.
>
> Lots of old stuff out there.
That might make for quite an interesting talk, Jared. :)
--
Tom
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Crocker"
> Has been running for a while, time to shut ‘er down. She (is a router
> a she?) used to handle all of my BGP GigE links but over the years has
> been demoted to OSPF and T1 aggregation.
>
> If anyone needs a boat anchor let me know.
Pleas
gmail.com]
>Sent: Saturday, 20 September, 2014 14:57
>To: Keith Medcalf
>Cc: Daniel Sterling; Bacon Zombie; nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: Re: Saying goodnight to my GSR
>
>> And what, exactly, is it vulnerable to?
>
>Most of these, I'd imagine:
>http://www.cisco.com/c/
On (2014-09-20 14:25 -0600), Keith Medcalf wrote:
> And what, exactly, is it vulnerable to?
Fair question. Felix Lindner has shown some ~0 budget attacks on IOS. But I'm
not sure if there actually are known attack vectors for properly secured
system (iACL, rACL in this case)
Crash bugs are there
age-
> >From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Sterling
> >Sent: Saturday, 20 September, 2014 12:06
> >To: Bacon Zombie
> >Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> >Subject: Re: Saying goodnight to my GSR
> >
> >Again, you're focusing resentment t
And what, exactly, is it vulnerable to?
>-Original Message-
>From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Sterling
>Sent: Saturday, 20 September, 2014 12:06
>To: Bacon Zombie
>Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: Re: Saying goodnight to my GSR
>
&g
> On Sep 20, 2014, at 1:54 PM, Daniel Sterling
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Bacon Zombie wrote:
>
>> So when was the last time you patched this internet facing device?
>
> Isn't the better response, thank you for decommissioning it?
>
> Can someone from cisco set up a poll
Again, you're focusing resentment towards someone who did the right
thing. Negative reinforcement will discourage others from taking
action and will discourage them from encouraging others to take
action.
Let's focus on who still has vulnerable equipment and how to help
them. Let's not shame peopl
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Bacon Zombie wrote:
> So when was the last time you patched this internet facing device?
Isn't the better response, thank you for decommissioning it?
Can someone from cisco set up a poll or release whatever numbers they
have about how many of these old devices a
> On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:37, Bacon Zombie wrote:
>
> So when was the last time you patched this internet facing device?
Sunday sept 4 2005?
Seems like a good run. If it hasn't been rooted or fallen over since then it's
apparently pretty secure...
> On Sep 20, 2014 7:12 PM, "Matthew S. Crock
OK thank you for decommissioning this.*
* Only if you either had authority to do so for max 1 year or had no
authority but were fighting to have it patches or replaced for years.
On Sep 20, 2014 7:54 PM, "Daniel Sterling"
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Bacon Zombie
> wrote:
>
> > So
So when was the last time you patched this internet facing device?
On Sep 20, 2014 7:12 PM, "Matthew S. Crocker"
wrote:
> -48VDC.
>
>
>
> > On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:58 AM, James R Cutler <
> james.cut...@consultant.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Matthew Crocker
> wrote about his
-48VDC.
> On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:58 AM, James R Cutler
> wrote:
>
> On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Matthew Crocker
> wrote about his old router:
>
>>
>> gsr8-1 uptime is 9 years, 9 weeks, 2 days, 8 hours, 39 minutes
>> Uptime for this control processor is 9 years, 2 weeks, 2 days, 18 minu
On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Matthew Crocker wrote
about his old router:
>
> gsr8-1 uptime is 9 years, 9 weeks, 2 days, 8 hours, 39 minutes
> Uptime for this control processor is 9 years, 2 weeks, 2 days, 18 minutes
> System returned to ROM by Stateful Switchover at 13:46:36 UTC Tue Sep 6 2005
On 2014-09-20 16:18, Matthew Crocker wrote:
[..]
> IOS (tm) GS Software (GSR-P-M), Version 12.0(30)S3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
[..]
> gsr8-1 uptime is 9 years, 9 weeks, 2 days, 8 hours, 39 minutes
Thank you for finally taking a vulnerable system of the Internet!
Greets,
Jeroen
24 matches
Mail list logo