On Sunday 14 January 2007 03:10, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Quoting Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I haven't looked at the code yet, but I tried to locate the bad commit. I
tried
commit a13f85d8a8eb40dfd157ab78c2fb91b5765b7b9d, which is your last merge,
just
before the SSB changes.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:12:40 +0800), Li Yewang
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
When I tested IPv6 redirect function about kernel 2.6.19.1, and found
that the kernel can send redirect packets whose target address is global
address, and the target is not the actual
Quoting Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Already done. Please pull my tree and check if it still crashes.
The crash is gone! Thanks! Still no association though.
Actually, I could scan, and I got 7 access points around. Only one is in
my
apartment.
RX sensitivity is not quite as
On Sunday 14 January 2007 15:18, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Quoting Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Already done. Please pull my tree and check if it still crashes.
The crash is gone! Thanks! Still no association though.
Ok, nice.
Can you send me a complete dmesg log after you brought up the
Quoting Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok, nice.
Can you send me a complete dmesg log after you brought up the card
and tried to assoc/send some packets?
Attached.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
ACPI: PCI Interrupt :0c:00.0[A] - GSI 17 (level, low) - IRQ 17
PCI: Setting latency timer of
On Sunday 14 January 2007 17:39, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Quoting Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok, nice.
Can you send me a complete dmesg log after you brought up the card
and tried to assoc/send some packets?
Attached.
Ok, thanks. I don't see something unusual.
You should try to
[IPV6] MCAST: Fix joining all-node multicast group on device initialization.
Join all-node multicast group after assignment of dev-ip6_ptr
because it must be assigned when ipv6_dev_mc_inc() is called.
This fixes Bug#7817, reported by [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Closes: 7817
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI
I sent this to the list but I don't know if it got to the list.
On 1/14/07, evan foss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Results so far
In a word Wow. It still doesn't work but I suspect that is could just
be my configuration. Power levels are not being reported correctly all
the time iwlist works
Hi Stephen
I just wanted to ask you, if you already had time to test our trace
extension for netem as discussed on the 13th of December.
Cheers
Rainer
Rainer Baumann wrote:
Hi Stephen
As discussed yesterday, here our patches to integrate trace control into netem
Trace Control for Netem:
evan foss wrote:
Results so far
In a word Wow. It still doesn't work but I suspect that is could just
be my configuration. Power levels are not being reported correctly all
the time iwlist works but nothing else to my knowledge. I remember
there being talk of power level reporting
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 says:
It is not mandatory, however, it is better to do this. I agree.
(Note: In usual, we do not install gateway'ed route with global
next-hop.)
Yes, but if somebody set the route with global next-hop, or some
other reasons, the next-hop with global address. The
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:44:39 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7817
Summary: commit edfe21a29b1dca9ce5a938317868066d2e21c385 breaks
IPv6 address autoconfiguration
Kernel Version:
12 matches
Mail list logo
