[netmod] new YANG 1.1 Issue Y62: YANG should not be NETCONF-specific

2015-07-25 Thread Andy Bierman
Hi, The WG should decide what it means for YANG to not be NETCONF-specific. Why does YANG define extensions to NETCONF operations (like insert)? IMO the normative text about NETCONF should not be in the YANG RFC. Andy ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ie

[netmod] new YANG 1.1 Issue Y61: I2RS support

2015-07-25 Thread Andy Bierman
Hi, I would like to open another issue for YANG 1.1, because I don't want to have 1.1 and then 1.2 right away. The NETMOD WG should evaluate the different ways to support ephemeral state, based on Jeff's draft. Andy ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 Y60 IETF 93 discussion summary and action items

2015-07-25 Thread Andy Bierman
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > This is the summary of the discussion of YANG 1.1 issue Y60 at the > IETF 93 meeting in Prague: > > - It is OK for a YANG 1.1 module to import a YANG 1.0 module (which >will of course be in

[netmod] YANG 1.1 Y60 IETF 93 discussion summary and action items

2015-07-25 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
This is the summary of the discussion of YANG 1.1 issue Y60 at the IETF 93 meeting in Prague: - It is OK for a YANG 1.1 module to import a YANG 1.0 module (which will of course be interpreted according to the YANG 1.0 rules). - The YANG 1.1 RFC will not obsolete RFC 6020. (RFC 6020 may be