On 16/02/2018 15:33, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
Robert Wilton writes:
Hi Lada,
On 16/02/2018 09:06, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
Robert Wilton writes:
I should add, as a contributor, I have read this document and think that
is ready for advancement.
I have three minor comments:
1) module "feat
Robert Wilton writes:
> Hi Lada,
>
>
> On 16/02/2018 09:06, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> Robert Wilton writes:
>>
>>> I should add, as a contributor, I have read this document and think that
>>> is ready for advancement.
>>>
>>> I have three minor comments:
>>>
>>> 1) module "feature" in YANG libra
Hi Lada,
On 16/02/2018 09:06, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
Robert Wilton writes:
I should add, as a contributor, I have read this document and think that
is ready for advancement.
I have three minor comments:
1) module "feature" in YANG library is a leaf-list, but currently it is
a list in YANG
Dear all,
At the last IETF meeting, Alia, Deborah and I looked at the publication
status of most YANG modules.
Since that time, I've been keeping a summary of the situation. Let me
share it with everybody.
Before publishing YANG modules, we have two series of bottlenecks:
- the YANG module im
Andy Bierman writes:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
> j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:03:32PM +, Robert Wilton wrote:
>> >
>> > 1) module "feature" in YANG library is a leaf-list, but currently it is a
>> > list in YANG
Robert Wilton writes:
> I should add, as a contributor, I have read this document and think that
> is ready for advancement.
>
> I have three minor comments:
>
> 1) module "feature" in YANG library is a leaf-list, but currently it is
> a list in YANG libary bis. I suspect that this is due to on
