On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 09:40, Greg wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
> you were right. I should have thought of it from that point
> of view. But even when I do a hdparm test on the
> individual drives, I still get very low readings. The
> drives are both set with basically everything turned off,
> includi
strange,
as this method is supposed to improve performance.
regards Greg
- Original Message -
From: "Benjamin Pflugmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] poor performance on software raid setup
Wa
Hi.
On Thu 2003-01-30 at 21:47:11 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> raid, I would get results around
> 387mb cache, and 45mb read. The settings I would use on
> these systems would be hdparm -X68 -c3 -d1 -u1 -m16.
> Now, when I ran hdparm in md9 (had to install, the distro
> didn't have it
Hi list,
just installed md yesterday. When setting up partitions
I decided to use software raid on the recomendations
of some that it can give a good increase in performance.
Previously on my other linux installs, taking the hdparm
readings as a performance measure, when not using software
raid,
