Re: [newbie] Vi vs Emacs... Not a flamewar!!! Any flames will be ignored (OT)

2003-02-07 Thread Angus Auld
- Original Message - From: Carroll Grigsby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Friday 07 February 2003 11:34 am, Angus Auld wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: FemmeFatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > At 09:32 PM 2/6/2003 -0500, you wrote: > > > >On Thursday 06 February 2003 09:

Re: [newbie] Vi vs Emacs... Not a flamewar!!! Any flames will be ignored (OT)

2003-02-07 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Friday 07 February 2003 11:34 am, Angus Auld wrote: > - Original Message - > From: FemmeFatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > At 09:32 PM 2/6/2003 -0500, you wrote: > > >On Thursday 06 February 2003 09:21 pm, Robert Wideman wrote: > > > > Wouldnt they just be called Canadians? Thats what i h

RE: [newbie] Vi vs Emacs... Not a flamewar!!! Any flames will be ignored (OT)

2003-02-07 Thread Robert Wideman
OMG, did i start a flame war for the Canadians? HEHE. How funny. Rob >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Angus Auld >> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 7:24 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subjec

Re: [newbie] Vi vs Emacs... Not a flamewar!!! Any flames will be ignored (OT)

2003-02-07 Thread Angus Auld
- Original Message - From: Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 11:32, FemmeFatale wrote: > > > *giggles* Mike: I'd love to say theres no flames cause I put my foot down > > in the subject line. I can't say that though cause this list really is > > civil mos